FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4367551461> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4367551461 endingPage "68" @default.
• W4367551461 startingPage "45" @default.
• W4367551461 abstract "The liberal model for the legal regulation of electronic signatures (in terms of form and content) is favoured by international models, in particular the UNCITRAL Model Law. The legal regulation of electronic signatures in European states (even those with a Germanic legal tradition) is also evolving in this direction, which is probably related to the gradual overcoming of distrust in new signature techniques and technologies. This justifies the conclusion that the Polish legal regulation of the electronic signature should not be stricter than the European standards, reflecting a moderately liberal model of regulation of this signature. This should be a general regulation, representing a minimum intervention in the market for certification services. In particular, this regulation should ensure the security of electronic trading without discriminating against any electronic signature technology or closing off any entity that meets the statutory conditions from providing certification services. Greater freedom in the provision of such services could be counterbalanced by an appropriate legal regulation of the scope of responsibility of entities 'entangled' in the process of using an electronic signature (so-called 'network' liability as a type of tort liability) and the statutory protection of 'informational' privacy (personal data) of persons using an electronic signature. The organisational and legal regulation of trustworthy electronic signatures could go in the following directions: a) limiting the scope of legal rationing to qualified certificate issuers; b) adoption of the principle of voluntary submission to public law supervision; c) designating as the supervisory authority a non-ministerial body of a highly independent and interdisciplinary nature (e.g. the National Commission for Electronic Signatures), which should maintain a publicly accessible list of certification service providers under a public oversight system; (d) allowing the supervisory authority - as is the case in other countries - to outsource certain supervisory functions to technologically specialised private bodies. Excessive rigour in the regulation of electronic signatures in the institutional sphere (infrastructures of mutual trust) can be counterproductive. Instead of resulting in the expected widespread use of this signature (on a par with the ubiquity of the handwritten signature) and increasing the speed of electronic business and the desired flexibility of electronic business (i.e. the smooth uptake of developments in electronic authentication technology), it may lead to rigidity or even blocking of electronic business. Strict conditions regarding the provision of certification services could also result in those interested in using electronic signatures using foreign certification bodies rather than domestic ones. Moderation in terms of rigour is therefore highly desirable. This is encouraged both by the constitutional principle of proportionality in the restriction of rights and freedoms, which undoubtedly applies to the provision of certification services, and by the consideration of the development of international electronic contracting, which can only be facilitated by a legal regulation of electronic signatures that corresponds to international standards (rather than a 'parochial' one, characterised by distrust of the new technology)." @default.
• W4367551461 created "2023-05-01" @default.
• W4367551461 creator A5081847070 @default.
• W4367551461 date "2023-04-30" @default.
• W4367551461 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4367551461 title "Liberalny czy rygorystyczny model regulacji prawnej podpisu elektronicznego w Polsce" @default.
• W4367551461 doi "https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.2001.3-4.4" @default.
• W4367551461 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4367551461 type Work @default.
• W4367551461 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4367551461 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4367551461 hasAuthorship W4367551461A5081847070 @default.
• W4367551461 hasBestOaLocation W43675514611 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C138170105 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C196587545 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C10138342 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C111919701 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C138170105 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C144133560 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C162324750 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C17744445 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C190253527 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C196587545 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C199539241 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C2776949292 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C41008148 @default.
• W4367551461 hasConceptScore W4367551461C98045186 @default.
• W4367551461 hasIssue "3-4 (149-150)" @default.
• W4367551461 hasLocation W43675514611 @default.
• W4367551461 hasOpenAccess W4367551461 @default.
• W4367551461 hasPrimaryLocation W43675514611 @default.
• W4367551461 hasRelatedWork W2017019202 @default.
• W4367551461 hasRelatedWork W2326466382 @default.
• W4367551461 hasRelatedWork W2376816510 @default.
• W4367551461 hasRelatedWork W2388353819 @default.
• W4367551461 hasRelatedWork W2568456651 @default.
• W4367551461 hasRelatedWork W2758765230 @default.
• W4367551461 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4367551461 hasRelatedWork W3123315438 @default.
• W4367551461 hasRelatedWork W3126145956 @default.
• W4367551461 hasRelatedWork W4236662274 @default.
• W4367551461 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4367551461 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4367551461 workType "article" @default.