FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4367675465> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4367675465 endingPage "012484" @default.
• W4367675465 startingPage "medhum" @default.
• W4367675465 abstract "This article analyses the literary representation of pain scales and assessment in two chronic pain narratives: ‘The Pain Scale’, a lyric essay by Eula Biss, and essays from Sonya Huber’s collection Pain Woman Takes Your Keys, and Other Essays from a Nervous System . Establishing first a brief history of methods attempting to quantify pain before my close reading, I read both Biss’ and Huber’s accounts as performative explorations of the limitations of using linear pain scales for pain which is recursive and enduring. Considering both texts as cripistemologies of chronic pain, my literary analysis attends to their criticism of the pain scale, including its implicit reliance on imagination and memory, and how its unidimensionality and synchronic focus prove inadequate for lasting pain. For Biss, this surfaces as a quiet critique of numbers and a disturbance of their fixity, while Huber’s criticism employs the motif of pain’s legibility across multiple bodies to spell out alternative meanings of chronic pain. Crucially, this article proposes a crip and embodied approach for reading and responding to accounts of chronic pain’s measurement, including Biss’ and Huber’s literary accounts, and the biomedical account of pains scales which this article reads alongside them. The article’s analysis draws on my personal experience of chronic pain, neurodivergence and disability to demonstrate the generativity of an embodied approach to literary analysis. Rather than bowing to the impulse to impose false coherence on my reading of Biss and Huber, my article foregrounds the impact of the re-reading, misreading, cognitive dissonance and breaks necessitated by chronic pain and processing delays on this analysis. In bringing an ostensibly crip methodology to bear on readings of chronic pain, I hope to invigorate discussions on reading, writing and knowing chronic pain in the critical medical humanities." @default.
• W4367675465 created "2023-05-03" @default.
• W4367675465 creator A5064295119 @default.
• W4367675465 date "2023-05-02" @default.
• W4367675465 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4367675465 title "Cripping the pain scale: literary and biomedical narratives of pain assessment" @default.
• W4367675465 cites W1985196225 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W1997198033 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2020793243 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2039165908 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2049012127 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2066150431 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2071595087 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2137008524 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2162638563 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2521336972 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2523636487 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2570751018 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2781620608 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2785147795 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W2923245862 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W4207017369 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W4234336012 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W4236315461 @default.
• W4367675465 cites W4245010563 @default.
• W4367675465 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2022-012484" @default.
• W4367675465 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37130743" @default.
• W4367675465 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4367675465 type Work @default.
• W4367675465 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4367675465 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4367675465 hasAuthorship W4367675465A5064295119 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C100609095 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C134141054 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C2781118164 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C100609095 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C107038049 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C111472728 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C124952713 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C134141054 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C138885662 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C142362112 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C15744967 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C169760540 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C180747234 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C199033989 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C2781118164 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C41895202 @default.
• W4367675465 hasConceptScore W4367675465C554936623 @default.
• W4367675465 hasLocation W43676754651 @default.
• W4367675465 hasLocation W43676754652 @default.
• W4367675465 hasOpenAccess W4367675465 @default.
• W4367675465 hasPrimaryLocation W43676754651 @default.
• W4367675465 hasRelatedWork W1557561608 @default.
• W4367675465 hasRelatedWork W2018520305 @default.
• W4367675465 hasRelatedWork W2389109298 @default.
• W4367675465 hasRelatedWork W2479213847 @default.
• W4367675465 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4367675465 hasRelatedWork W2910686932 @default.
• W4367675465 hasRelatedWork W2913392791 @default.
• W4367675465 hasRelatedWork W3009106019 @default.
• W4367675465 hasRelatedWork W4200552090 @default.
• W4367675465 hasRelatedWork W4375933893 @default.
• W4367675465 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4367675465 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4367675465 workType "article" @default.