FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W43732976> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W43732976 endingPage "303" @default.
• W43732976 startingPage "302" @default.
• W43732976 abstract "Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and its extent during radical prostatectomy (RRP) continue to be hotly debated. PLND is performed infrequently during RRP, with open and minimally invasive surgeries, especially in low-risk patients, owing to low yield of positive nodes, longer operative time, and the risk of vascular injury or lymphoceles. That trend seems to be shifting toward performing PLND in patients with high-risk prostate cancer, because PLND provides accurate staging, indicating patients who should be considered for adjuvant therapy or at least followed up closely, 1 Touijer K. Rabbani F. Otero J.R. et al. Standard versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer in patients with a predicted probability of nodal metastasis greater than 1%. J Urol. 2007; 178: 120-124 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (110) Google Scholar and because PLND during RRP seems to cure, or is at least associated with, long-term survival in some patients with positive nodes. 2 Schumacher M.C. Burkhard F.C. Thalmann G.N. et al. Good outcomes for patients with few lymph node metastases after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008; 54: 344-349 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (175) Google Scholar The current debate is about what is the necessary template (limit) of a PLND during RRP, and what should we call it? And can PLND be done in a timely and complete fashion using the robot? Pelvic Lymphadenectomy During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Assessing Nodal Yield, Perioperative Outcomes, and ComplicationsUrologyVol. 74Issue 2PreviewTo describe our pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) technique during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and to evaluate the nodal yield and perioperative outcomes. PLND is commonly performed with radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Because of the limitations of the robotic arm pitch in accessing the pelvic sidewall and undersurface of the iliac bifurcation, uro-oncologists have questioned the adequacy of robotic PLND. Full-Text PDF Editorial CommentUrologyVol. 74Issue 2PreviewThe preceding article is a timely report that addresses an important aspect of robotic radical prostatectomy, namely, the need for, and, most importantly, the adequacy of, nodal dissection. This has, for the most part, been overlooked in high-volume robotic series and only recently emphatically emphasized in high-volume open radical prostatectomy series. The recent report by Schumacher et al.1 is appropriately cited in the present report. It presents sobering data and survival outcomes in favor of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy, even in the prostate-specific antigen era. Full-Text PDF ReplyUrologyVol. 74Issue 2PreviewIt has been well demonstrated in non-neurologic malignancies (breast, lung, gastric, and colorectal) as well as in bladder cancer that regional lymphadenectomy is both diagnostic and therapeutic, and that the added survival benefit depends on the number of lymph nodes removed. Although it is universally accepted that pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy is a reliable staging tool, its role and potential benefit for patients with prostate cancer are still controversial. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W43732976 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W43732976 creator A5048541532 @default.
• W43732976 date "2009-08-01" @default.
• W43732976 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W43732976 title "Editorial Comment" @default.
• W43732976 cites W2075007329 @default.
• W43732976 cites W2113699255 @default.
• W43732976 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.080" @default.
• W43732976 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19646611" @default.
• W43732976 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W43732976 type Work @default.
• W43732976 sameAs 43732976 @default.
• W43732976 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W43732976 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W43732976 hasAuthorship W43732976A5048541532 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C2778660094 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C2779466945 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C2780824555 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W43732976 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C121608353 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C126322002 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C126894567 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C141071460 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C2775862295 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C2778660094 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C2779466945 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C2780192828 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C2780824555 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C2780849966 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C31174226 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C61434518 @default.
• W43732976 hasConceptScore W43732976C71924100 @default.
• W43732976 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W43732976 hasLocation W437329761 @default.
• W43732976 hasLocation W437329762 @default.
• W43732976 hasOpenAccess W43732976 @default.
• W43732976 hasPrimaryLocation W437329761 @default.
• W43732976 hasRelatedWork W1853412222 @default.
• W43732976 hasRelatedWork W1975388219 @default.
• W43732976 hasRelatedWork W1980207312 @default.
• W43732976 hasRelatedWork W1985396652 @default.
• W43732976 hasRelatedWork W1995511036 @default.
• W43732976 hasRelatedWork W2048553625 @default.
• W43732976 hasRelatedWork W2060942598 @default.
• W43732976 hasRelatedWork W2132298314 @default.
• W43732976 hasRelatedWork W2159366134 @default.
• W43732976 hasRelatedWork W2468370358 @default.
• W43732976 hasVolume "74" @default.
• W43732976 isParatext "false" @default.
• W43732976 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W43732976 magId "43732976" @default.
• W43732976 workType "editorial" @default.