FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4376125965> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4376125965 endingPage "101760" @default.
• W4376125965 startingPage "101760" @default.
• W4376125965 abstract "Cranioplasty is required after decompressive craniectomy (DC) to restore brain protection and cosmetic appearance, as well as to optimize rehabilitation potential from underlying disease. Although the procedure is straightforward, complications either caused by bone flap resorption (BFR) or graft infection (GI), contribute to relevant comorbidity and increasing health care cost. Synthetic calvarial implants (allogenic cranioplasty) are not susceptible to resorption and cumulative failure rates (BFR and GI) tend therefore to be lower in comparison with autologous bone. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is to pool existing evidence of infection-related cranioplasty failure in autologous versus allogenic cranioplasty, when bone resorption is removed from the equation.A systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science medical databases was performed on three time points (2018, 2020 and 2022). All clinical studies published between January 2010 and December 2022, in which autologous and allogenic cranioplasty was performed after DC, were considered for inclusion. Studies including non-DC cranioplasty and cranioplasty in children were excluded. The cranioplasty failure rate based on GI in both autologous and allogenic groups was noted. Data were extracted by means of standardized tables and all included studies were subjected to a risk of bias (RoB) assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa assessment tool.A total of 411 articles were identified and screened. After duplicate removal, 106 full-texts were analyzed. Eventually, 14 studies fulfilled the defined inclusion criteria including one randomized controlled trial, one prospective and 12 retrospective cohort studies. All but one study were rated as of poor quality based on the RoB analysis, mainly due to lacking disclosure why which material (autologous vs. allogenic) was chosen and how GI was defined. The infection-related cranioplasty failure rate was 6.9% (125/1808) for autologous and 8.3% (63/761) for allogenic implants resulting in an OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.13 (Z ​= ​1.24; p ​= ​0.22).In respect to infection-related cranioplasty failure, autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy does not underperform compared to synthetic implants. This result must be interpreted in light of limitations of existing studies. Risk of graft infection does not seem a valid argument to prefer one implant material over the other. Offering an economically superior, biocompatible and perfect fitting cranioplasty implant, autologous cranioplasty can still have a role as the first option in patients with low risk of developing osteolysis or for whom BFR might not be of major concern.This systematic review was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews. PROSPERO: CRD42018081720." @default.
• W4376125965 created "2023-05-12" @default.
• W4376125965 creator A5075219592 @default.
• W4376125965 creator A5076888661 @default.
• W4376125965 creator A5078927751 @default.
• W4376125965 creator A5091922150 @default.
• W4376125965 date "2023-01-01" @default.
• W4376125965 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4376125965 title "Infection-related failure of autologous versus allogenic cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy – A systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W4376125965 cites W1865700549 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W1865900109 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W1985831429 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W1993981587 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2004216830 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2007573675 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2009326813 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2015196998 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2035977748 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2046447262 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2061695899 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2070409621 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2120109174 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2134833483 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2138228636 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2158671595 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2166025830 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2176457254 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2238004258 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2264539476 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2300410751 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2308320990 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2326355042 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2397667778 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2404954194 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2417512290 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2462102362 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2487832177 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2559947386 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2594208698 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2606954723 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2614269561 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2743784935 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2765286062 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2768541889 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2790239130 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2794756966 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2806879509 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2947272988 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2971947634 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W2978795816 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3003585452 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3020140513 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3023278213 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3047976131 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3080955607 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3114099706 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3117355807 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3120603460 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3138160660 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3138592422 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3140054147 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3171607061 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W3182425843 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W4205175224 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W4280567305 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W4281249357 @default.
• W4376125965 cites W4286260487 @default.
• W4376125965 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.101760" @default.
• W4376125965 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37383468" @default.
• W4376125965 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4376125965 type Work @default.
• W4376125965 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4376125965 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4376125965 hasAuthorship W4376125965A5075219592 @default.
• W4376125965 hasAuthorship W4376125965A5076888661 @default.
• W4376125965 hasAuthorship W4376125965A5078927751 @default.
• W4376125965 hasAuthorship W4376125965A5091922150 @default.
• W4376125965 hasBestOaLocation W43761259651 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C2777042948 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C2777996791 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C2779300802 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C2781017439 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConceptScore W4376125965C118552586 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConceptScore W4376125965C126322002 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConceptScore W4376125965C141071460 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConceptScore W4376125965C168563851 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConceptScore W4376125965C1862650 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConceptScore W4376125965C199343813 @default.
• W4376125965 hasConceptScore W4376125965C2777042948 @default.

• next