Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4376643146> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 93 of
93
with 100 items per page.
- W4376643146 endingPage "56" @default.
- W4376643146 startingPage "54" @default.
- W4376643146 abstract "A systematic appraisal and statistical aggregation of primary studies.Scopus/ELSEVIER, PubMed/MEDLINE, Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science (i.e., Web of Science Core Collection-WoS, Korean Journal Database-KJD, Russian Science Citation Index-RSCI, SciELO Citation Index-SCIELO), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Cochrane Library.The complementary searches consisted of OpenGrey, Google Scholar (first 100 returns), Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, DART-Europe E-theses Portal-DEEP, Opening access to UK theses-EThOS.Human clinical trials studies in English language with at least 10 patients with mature or immature permanent teeth with pulpitis characterized by spontaneous pain in each arm (i.e., root canal treatment [RCT] and pulpotomy) at the end of the study, comparing the patient- (Primary: survival, pain, tenderness, swelling assessed by clinical history, clinical examination, and pain scales; Secondary: tooth function, need for further intervention, adverse effects; OHRQoL using a validated questionnaire) and clinical-reported outcomes (Primary: emerging apical radiolucency as per intraoral periapical radiograph or limited FOV CBCT scan; Secondary: radiological evidence of continued root formation and presence of sinus tract).Two independent review authors conducted study selection, data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessment and a third reviewer was consulted for solving disagreements. When insufficient or absent information, the corresponding author was reached out to for further explanation. The Cochrane RoB tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) was evaluated the quality of studies.The meta-analysis was performed on a fixed-effect model to estimate pooled effect size such as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed using the R software. The quality of evidence assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach (GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool [software], McMaster University, 2015).Five primary studies were included. Four studies referred to a multicentre trial assessing postoperative pain and long-term success rate after pulpotomy compared with one-visit RCT in 407 mature molars. The other study was a multicentre trial assessing postoperative pain in 550 mature molars treated with pulpotomy and pulp capping with the calcium-enriched mixture (CEM), pulpotomy and pulp capping with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and one-visit RCT. Both trials primarily reported first molars from young adults. When looking at the results of postoperative pain, all the trials included had a low RoB. However, when evaluating the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the included reports, it was determined that there was a high RoB. The meta-analysis found that the likelihood of experiencing pain (i.e., mild, moderate, or severe) at the 7th postoperative day was not affected by the type of intervention (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.63-1.55, I2 = 0%).The study design, risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias domains were used to grade the quality of evidence for postoperative pain between RCT and full pulpotomy, resulting in a 'High' grade. In the first year, clinical success was high for both interventions, with a rate of 98%. However, the success rate declined over time, with pulpotomy showing a 78.1% success rate and RCT showing a 75.3% success rate at the 5-year follow up.This systematic review was limited by the inclusion of only two trials, indicating a lack of sufficient evidence to draw definitive conclusions. Nonetheless, the available clinical data suggests that patient-reported pain outcomes do not differ significantly between RCT and pulpotomy at Day 7 postoperatively, and that the long-term clinical success rate of both treatments is comparable, as demonstrated by a single randomized control trial. However, to establish a more robust evidence base, additional high-quality randomized clinical trials, conducted by diverse research groups, are needed in this field. In conclusion, this review underscores the insufficiency of current evidence to draw solid recommendations." @default.
- W4376643146 created "2023-05-17" @default.
- W4376643146 creator A5053929791 @default.
- W4376643146 creator A5070058953 @default.
- W4376643146 creator A5073905027 @default.
- W4376643146 creator A5080646313 @default.
- W4376643146 date "2023-05-15" @default.
- W4376643146 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
- W4376643146 title "Pulpotomy versus root canal treatment in permanent teeth with spontaneous pain: comparable clinical and patient outcomes, but insufficient evidence" @default.
- W4376643146 cites W1969706674 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W2004871995 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W2084332551 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W2093194835 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W2191418438 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W2276373522 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W2532655407 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W2748026723 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W2972935647 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W3088464793 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W3108770488 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W3113892432 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W3160539928 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W3172374725 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W3207391797 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W4200569226 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W4283805802 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W4311622270 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W4318042567 @default.
- W4376643146 cites W4321373349 @default.
- W4376643146 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00878-4" @default.
- W4376643146 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37188923" @default.
- W4376643146 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4376643146 type Work @default.
- W4376643146 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4376643146 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4376643146 hasAuthorship W4376643146A5053929791 @default.
- W4376643146 hasAuthorship W4376643146A5070058953 @default.
- W4376643146 hasAuthorship W4376643146A5073905027 @default.
- W4376643146 hasAuthorship W4376643146A5080646313 @default.
- W4376643146 hasBestOaLocation W43766431461 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C18468158 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C2779747767 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C2779847468 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C126322002 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C141071460 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C168563851 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C17744445 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C18468158 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C199343813 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C199539241 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C202271784 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C2776478404 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C2779473830 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C2779747767 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C2779847468 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C44249647 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C535046627 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C71924100 @default.
- W4376643146 hasConceptScore W4376643146C82789193 @default.
- W4376643146 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W4376643146 hasLocation W43766431461 @default.
- W4376643146 hasLocation W43766431462 @default.
- W4376643146 hasOpenAccess W4376643146 @default.
- W4376643146 hasPrimaryLocation W43766431461 @default.
- W4376643146 hasRelatedWork W151557808 @default.
- W4376643146 hasRelatedWork W1968178156 @default.
- W4376643146 hasRelatedWork W2010224127 @default.
- W4376643146 hasRelatedWork W2514161440 @default.
- W4376643146 hasRelatedWork W30629738 @default.
- W4376643146 hasRelatedWork W3216714807 @default.
- W4376643146 hasRelatedWork W4225514461 @default.
- W4376643146 hasRelatedWork W4247152754 @default.
- W4376643146 hasRelatedWork W4366418553 @default.
- W4376643146 hasRelatedWork W4368362956 @default.
- W4376643146 hasVolume "24" @default.
- W4376643146 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4376643146 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4376643146 workType "article" @default.