FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4376848676> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4376848676 abstract "Background Veno‐venous bypass is used to overcome the effects of clamping of the inferior vena cava and portal vein during liver transplanation. The routine use of veno‐venous bypass is, however, controversial. Objectives To compare the benefits and harms of veno‐venous bypass (irrespective of open or percutaneous technique; heparin‐coated or no heparin‐coating) versus no veno‐venous bypass during liver transplantation. To compare the benefits and harms of the different techniques of veno‐venous bypass during liver transplantation. Search methods We searched The Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until December 2010. Selection criteria We included randomised clinical trials comparing veno‐venous bypass during liver transplantation (irrespective of language or publication status). Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and independently extracted data. We analysed the data with both the fixed‐effect and the random‐effects models using RevMan Analysis. For continuous outcomes, we calculated the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on intention‐to‐treat or available case analysis. For binary outcomes, we used the Fisher's exact test since none of the comparisons of binary outcomes included more than one trial. Main results We identified three trials with high risk of bias which compared veno‐venous bypass (n = 65) versus no veno‐venous bypass (n = 66). None of the trials reported patient or graft survival. There were no significant differences regarding renal failure or blood transfusion requirements between the two groups. None of the trials reported on the morbidity related to veno‐venous bypass or the requirement of veno‐venous bypass in the control group. We identified one trial with high risk of bias which compared percutaneous (n = 20) versus open technique (n =19) of veno‐venous bypass. The patient or graft survival was not reported. There was no difference in veno‐venous bypass related morbidity between the two groups. The operating time was significantly shorter in the percutaneous technique group (MD ‐59 minutes; 95% CI ‐102 to ‐16). Authors' conclusions There is no evidence to support or refute the use of veno‐venous bypass in liver transplantation. There is no evidence to prefer any particular technique of veno‐venous bypass in liver transplantation." @default.
• W4376848676 created "2023-05-18" @default.
• W4376848676 creator A5010639369 @default.
• W4376848676 creator A5014010875 @default.
• W4376848676 creator A5045604232 @default.
• W4376848676 creator A5079079428 @default.
• W4376848676 date "2011-03-16" @default.
• W4376848676 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W4376848676 title "Veno-venous bypass versus none for liver transplantation" @default.
• W4376848676 cites W1598602811 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W1964489041 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W1971441597 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W1971441603 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W1977592210 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W1990130138 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2004361661 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2006102849 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2014402377 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2017455113 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2048636546 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2054558087 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2069243984 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2072477938 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2086148792 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2088473336 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2101267597 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2106051200 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2107328434 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2109916035 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2117294447 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2118577717 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2118665584 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2122910972 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2126930838 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2134338262 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2138039054 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2157347940 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2157823046 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2160795579 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2167759554 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2168898546 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W2170952317 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W4214559180 @default.
• W4376848676 cites W4241518273 @default.
• W4376848676 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007712.pub2" @default.
• W4376848676 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W4376848676 type Work @default.
• W4376848676 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W4376848676 countsByYear W43768486762015 @default.
• W4376848676 countsByYear W43768486762016 @default.
• W4376848676 countsByYear W43768486762018 @default.
• W4376848676 countsByYear W43768486762019 @default.
• W4376848676 countsByYear W43768486762022 @default.
• W4376848676 countsByYear W43768486762023 @default.
• W4376848676 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4376848676 hasAuthorship W4376848676A5010639369 @default.
• W4376848676 hasAuthorship W4376848676A5014010875 @default.
• W4376848676 hasAuthorship W4376848676A5045604232 @default.
• W4376848676 hasAuthorship W4376848676A5079079428 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConcept C2779609443 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConcept C2911091166 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConceptScore W4376848676C126322002 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConceptScore W4376848676C141071460 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConceptScore W4376848676C168563851 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConceptScore W4376848676C2776478404 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConceptScore W4376848676C2779609443 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConceptScore W4376848676C2911091166 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConceptScore W4376848676C71924100 @default.
• W4376848676 hasConceptScore W4376848676C95190672 @default.
• W4376848676 hasLocation W43768486761 @default.
• W4376848676 hasOpenAccess W4376848676 @default.
• W4376848676 hasPrimaryLocation W43768486761 @default.
• W4376848676 hasRelatedWork W1967911880 @default.
• W4376848676 hasRelatedWork W2381982637 @default.
• W4376848676 hasRelatedWork W2802322663 @default.
• W4376848676 hasRelatedWork W2914141471 @default.
• W4376848676 hasRelatedWork W3013041320 @default.
• W4376848676 hasRelatedWork W3096683796 @default.
• W4376848676 hasRelatedWork W3132173363 @default.
• W4376848676 hasRelatedWork W4207070666 @default.
• W4376848676 hasRelatedWork W4292248146 @default.
• W4376848676 hasRelatedWork W4385751578 @default.
• W4376848676 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4376848676 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4376848676 workType "article" @default.