Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4377011303> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4377011303 endingPage "709" @default.
- W4377011303 startingPage "696" @default.
- W4377011303 abstract "Abstract Introduction Analysis of the 3‐dimensional implant position, the bone defect morphology, and the soft tissue situation guides the decision to preserve or to remove an implant with a severe peri‐implantitis lesion. The aim of this narrative review was to analyze and to comprehensively illustrate the treatment options focusing on peri‐implant bone regeneration in presence of severe peri‐implant bone loss. Methods A database search was performed independently by the two reviewers to identify case reports, case series, cohort, retrospective, and prospective studies about peri‐implant bone regeneration with a follow‐up of at least 6 months. Of the 344 studies issued during the database analysis, 96 publications were selected by the authors for this review. Results Deproteinized bovine bone mineral remains the best documented material for defect regeneration in peri‐implantitis in combination with or without a barrier membrane. While studies using autogenous bone in peri‐implantitis therapy are rarely found, they do report favorable potential of vertical bone regeneration. Moreover, while membranes are an inherent part of the guided bone regeneration, a 5‐year follow‐up study demonstrated clinical and radiographic improvements with and without a membrane. The administration of systemic antibiotics is frequently performed in clinical studies observing regenerative surgical peri‐implantitis therapy, but the analysis of the literature does not support a positive effect of this medication. Most studies for regenerative peri‐implantitis surgery recommend the removal of the prosthetic rehabilitation and the use a marginal incision with a full‐thickness access flap elevation. This allows for a good overview for regenerative procedures with a certain risk of wound dehiscences and incomplete regeneration. An alternative approach referring to the poncho technique may reduce the risk of dehiscence. The effectiveness of implant surface decontamination might have an impact on peri‐implant bone regeneration without any clinical superiority of a certain technique. Conclusion The available literature reveals that the success of peri‐implantitis therapy is limited to the reduction of bleeding on probing, the improvement of the peri‐implant probing depth and a small amount of vertical defect fill. On this basis, no specific recommendations for bone regeneration in surgical peri‐implantitis therapy can be made. Innovative approaches for flap design, surface decontamination, bone defect grafting material, and soft tissue augmentation should be followed closely to find advanced techniques for favorable peri‐implant bone augmentation." @default.
- W4377011303 created "2023-05-19" @default.
- W4377011303 creator A5001453779 @default.
- W4377011303 creator A5015565654 @default.
- W4377011303 date "2023-05-17" @default.
- W4377011303 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W4377011303 title "Bone regeneration as treatment of peri‐implant disease: A narrative review" @default.
- W4377011303 cites W1490252576 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W1966315031 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W1987998633 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W1998703667 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2007699228 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2020909154 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2035961596 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2047536663 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2069121626 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2072745968 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2111609114 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2117910747 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2124842708 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2280219474 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2294290051 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2302736678 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2314464343 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2406036629 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2412250841 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2525333045 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2554147348 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2611379437 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2625165272 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2748214442 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2754389011 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2789601726 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2804628285 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2805619698 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2883277728 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2885803775 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2897997547 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2900791506 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2903444557 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2909370897 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2911786443 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2914969489 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2927854533 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2941522523 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2945922506 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2971622866 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2971954953 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2972030344 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2980669835 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2984453151 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W2996446293 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3021385621 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3024351519 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3033097863 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3049103234 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3093516376 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3134265580 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3139270656 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3157483532 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3167503117 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3174435104 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3180597036 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3191462213 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3206702172 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3206895230 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W3206920038 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W4200163148 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W4210683597 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W4214875805 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W4281973108 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W4282974463 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W4284688663 @default.
- W4377011303 cites W4284990867 @default.
- W4377011303 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13209" @default.
- W4377011303 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37199027" @default.
- W4377011303 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4377011303 type Work @default.
- W4377011303 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W4377011303 countsByYear W43770113032023 @default.
- W4377011303 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4377011303 hasAuthorship W4377011303A5001453779 @default.
- W4377011303 hasAuthorship W4377011303A5015565654 @default.
- W4377011303 hasBestOaLocation W43770113031 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConcept C136948725 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConcept C171056886 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConcept C2780802913 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConcept C3020000205 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConceptScore W4377011303C136948725 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConceptScore W4377011303C141071460 @default.
- W4377011303 hasConceptScore W4377011303C171056886 @default.