FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4377014460> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4377014460 endingPage "S702" @default.
• W4377014460 startingPage "S701" @default.
• W4377014460 abstract "Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is an excellent alternative to His bundle pacing (HBP). Due to its non-traditional intraseptal lead placement, rare but unusual complications have been described. We present the case of a unique complication of a very large septal hematoma following LBBP. n/a An 88-year-old female with Coronary disease, renal insufficiency, and uncontrolled atrial fibrillation was referred for AV node ablation and conduction system pacing. Due to high HBP thresholds, a LBBP lead was implanted in proximal location (Stim-V6 peak=70ms, QRSd=135ms) with a backup second LBBP lead at a slightly distal location (Stim-V6 peak=61ms, QRSd=121ms) with low capture thresholds. She was discharged home the same day. She was readmitted a-day later with nausea, weakness, and significant dyspnea. Echocardiogram revealed a very large septal hematoma (61mm x 40mm) with complete obliteration of right ventricle cavity and no pericardial effusion (Figure 1A). IV fluid bolus was given, and Apixaban/Clopidogrel/ASA were held. Angiography and possible embolization of bleeding septal perforator was considered but not performed due to her CKD and hemodynamic stability. Serial echo revealed improved RV filling, stable hematoma and absent effusion. She was discharged on day 7 in stable condition. Anticoagulation was resumed after 2 weeks. Repeat echo at 6 weeks showed complete resolution of interventricular septal hematoma and lead parameters were stable (Figure 1B). This is a unique and rare case of a giant interventricular septal hematoma post LBBP, successfully managed with conservative management. Given rarity of complication, maintaining a broad differential for early recognition and treatment remains paramount. Avoiding a very proximal and anterior left bundle area, if possible, can be considered to avoid a major septal perforator. Repeat imaging and close hemodynamic monitoring is recommended in such patients. Angiography to localize the bleeding septal perforator and possible embolization may be considered for hemodynamic instability. This was deferred in our patient due to severe renal insufficiency, as well as lack of pericardial effusion and improving hemodynamics not requiring inotropic support. However, we recommend a multidisciplinary heart team and critical care approach, as was used in this case, to help personalize management." @default.
• W4377014460 created "2023-05-19" @default.
• W4377014460 creator A5019686702 @default.
• W4377014460 creator A5045577171 @default.
• W4377014460 creator A5072629631 @default.
• W4377014460 creator A5078973364 @default.
• W4377014460 creator A5086904042 @default.
• W4377014460 creator A5091125176 @default.
• W4377014460 date "2023-05-01" @default.
• W4377014460 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4377014460 title "PO-05-018 GIANT INTRASEPTAL HEMATOMA COMPLICATING LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH PACING: AN UNUSUAL CLINICAL CHALLENGE" @default.
• W4377014460 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1459" @default.
• W4377014460 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4377014460 type Work @default.
• W4377014460 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4377014460 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4377014460 hasAuthorship W4377014460A5019686702 @default.
• W4377014460 hasAuthorship W4377014460A5045577171 @default.
• W4377014460 hasAuthorship W4377014460A5072629631 @default.
• W4377014460 hasAuthorship W4377014460A5078973364 @default.
• W4377014460 hasAuthorship W4377014460A5086904042 @default.
• W4377014460 hasAuthorship W4377014460A5091125176 @default.
• W4377014460 hasBestOaLocation W43770144601 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConcept C2779662492 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConcept C2781175549 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConceptScore W4377014460C126322002 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConceptScore W4377014460C141071460 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConceptScore W4377014460C164705383 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConceptScore W4377014460C2779662492 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConceptScore W4377014460C2781175549 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConceptScore W4377014460C71924100 @default.
• W4377014460 hasConceptScore W4377014460C81182388 @default.
• W4377014460 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W4377014460 hasLocation W43770144601 @default.
• W4377014460 hasOpenAccess W4377014460 @default.
• W4377014460 hasPrimaryLocation W43770144601 @default.
• W4377014460 hasRelatedWork W132606176 @default.
• W4377014460 hasRelatedWork W1963325729 @default.
• W4377014460 hasRelatedWork W1979993852 @default.
• W4377014460 hasRelatedWork W2019326976 @default.
• W4377014460 hasRelatedWork W2030518481 @default.
• W4377014460 hasRelatedWork W2092286633 @default.
• W4377014460 hasRelatedWork W2589089829 @default.
• W4377014460 hasRelatedWork W2618254838 @default.
• W4377014460 hasRelatedWork W3133762537 @default.
• W4377014460 hasRelatedWork W4381197018 @default.
• W4377014460 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W4377014460 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4377014460 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4377014460 workType "article" @default.