FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4377090420> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4377090420 endingPage "194" @default.
• W4377090420 startingPage "186" @default.
• W4377090420 abstract "Aggressive patients are labelled as ‘CARE’ within their clinical history and the quality of nursing care they receive may be compromised because of concerns for staff safety. The aim of this study was to investigate if a difference in the quality of nursing care exists between aggressive patients labelled as CARE and other patients not labelled as CARE, hoping to identify whether this suggested a breach of patient welfare. This study used a cross-sectional, observational survey distributed online via social media veterinary nursing community pages. Open invitations were also emailed to the first author's own practice, and the RVC's Queen Mother Hospital for Animals. UK-based registered veterinary nurses who had been in practice within the last 12 months participated. Likert response categories of 1-5 were used to question registered veterinary nurses about how likely they were to undertake certain nursing activities for both CARE and non-CARE canine patients. In total, 390 registered veterinary nurses completed the questionnaire. Pearson's chi-squared test was used to statistically analyse the data. An association was discovered between level of nursing care and CARE or non-CARE labelled patients. Statistically significant differences (P=0.05) in nursing care were found under every nursing category for CARE patients. The key categories identified were patient hygiene, feeding, pain scoring, exercise and restraint. The current study provides evidence that aggressive canine patients do get a lower standard of nursing care compared to other canine patients. Areas of concern are highlighted when these differences are discussed in the context of animal welfare. The authors hope these findings serve as a prompt for practices to examine their performance towards aggressive patients to ensure adequate standards of nursing care and patient welfare are sustained." @default.
• W4377090420 created "2023-05-20" @default.
• W4377090420 creator A5040421512 @default.
• W4377090420 creator A5091979497 @default.
• W4377090420 date "2023-05-02" @default.
• W4377090420 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4377090420 title "Do ‘CARE’ labelled canine patients get a lower standard of nursing care?" @default.
• W4377090420 cites W1560547185 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W1704463864 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W1969783493 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W1996790397 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W1999328138 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2033512221 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2042150128 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2044728709 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2055604846 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2096602492 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2097249318 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2101811941 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2114586155 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2138592933 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2324087636 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2343610163 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2537714384 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2610760642 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2727525824 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2736268390 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2825175051 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W2974463674 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W3023521345 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W3091196733 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W3158787200 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W3162876533 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W3180559477 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W3189610091 @default.
• W4377090420 cites W629305187 @default.
• W4377090420 doi "https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2023.14.4.186" @default.
• W4377090420 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4377090420 type Work @default.
• W4377090420 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4377090420 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4377090420 hasAuthorship W4377090420A5040421512 @default.
• W4377090420 hasAuthorship W4377090420A5091979497 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConcept C2984889486 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConceptScore W4377090420C126322002 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConceptScore W4377090420C151730666 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConceptScore W4377090420C159110408 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConceptScore W4377090420C23131810 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConceptScore W4377090420C2777267654 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConceptScore W4377090420C2984889486 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConceptScore W4377090420C512399662 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConceptScore W4377090420C71924100 @default.
• W4377090420 hasConceptScore W4377090420C86803240 @default.
• W4377090420 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4377090420 hasLocation W43770904201 @default.
• W4377090420 hasOpenAccess W4377090420 @default.
• W4377090420 hasPrimaryLocation W43770904201 @default.
• W4377090420 hasRelatedWork W1531273998 @default.
• W4377090420 hasRelatedWork W2313076522 @default.
• W4377090420 hasRelatedWork W2754401184 @default.
• W4377090420 hasRelatedWork W2765980456 @default.
• W4377090420 hasRelatedWork W2976382042 @default.
• W4377090420 hasRelatedWork W2981703979 @default.
• W4377090420 hasRelatedWork W3032249327 @default.
• W4377090420 hasRelatedWork W4289753835 @default.
• W4377090420 hasRelatedWork W4289753884 @default.
• W4377090420 hasRelatedWork W2464797648 @default.
• W4377090420 hasVolume "14" @default.
• W4377090420 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4377090420 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4377090420 workType "article" @default.