FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4377293878> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4377293878 endingPage "e44790" @default.
• W4377293878 startingPage "e44790" @default.
• W4377293878 abstract "Background Telemedicine has played a vital role in providing psychiatric treatment to patients during the rapid transition of services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the use of telemedicine is expected to expand within the psychiatric field. The efficacy of telemedicine is well described in scientific literature. However, there is a need for a comprehensive quantitative review that analyzes and considers the different clinical outcomes and psychiatric diagnoses. Objective This paper aimed to assess whether individual psychiatric outpatient treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder, mood disorders, and anxiety disorders in adults using telemedicine is equivalent to in-person treatment. Methods A systematic search of randomized controlled trials was conducted using recognized databases for this review. Overall, 4 outcomes were assessed: treatment efficacy, levels of patient satisfaction, working alliance, and attrition rate. The inverse-variance method was used to summarize the effect size for each outcome. Results A total of 7414 records were identified, and 20 trials were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The trials included posttraumatic stress disorder (9 trials), depressive disorder (6 trials), a mix of different disorders (4 trials), and general anxiety disorder (1 trial). Overall, the analyses yielded evidence that telemedicine is comparable with in-person treatment regarding treatment efficacy (standardized mean difference −0.01, 95% CI −0.12 to 0.09; P=.84; I2=19%, 17 trials, n=1814), patient satisfaction mean difference (−0.66, 95% CI −1.60 to 0.28; P=.17; I2=44%, 6 trials, n=591), and attrition rates (risk ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.94-1.21; P=.32; I2=0%, 20 trials, n=2804). The results also indicated that the working alliance between telemedicine and in-person modalities was comparable, but the heterogeneity was substantial to considerable (mean difference 0.95, 95% CI −0.47 to 2.38; P=.19; I2=75%, 6 trials, n=539). Conclusions This meta-analysis provided new knowledge on individual telemedicine interventions that were considered equivalent to in-person treatment regarding efficacy, patient satisfaction, working alliance, and attrition rates across diagnoses. The certainty of the evidence regarding efficacy was rated as moderate. Furthermore, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to strengthen the evidence base for treatment provided via telemedicine in psychiatry, particularly for personality disorders and a range of anxiety disorders where there is a lack of studies. Individual patient data meta-analysis is suggested for future studies to personalize telemedicine. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021256357; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=256357" @default.
• W4377293878 created "2023-05-23" @default.
• W4377293878 creator A5002610230 @default.
• W4377293878 creator A5016800161 @default.
• W4377293878 creator A5028791110 @default.
• W4377293878 creator A5032629708 @default.
• W4377293878 creator A5044344721 @default.
• W4377293878 creator A5052226585 @default.
• W4377293878 creator A5070379405 @default.
• W4377293878 creator A5082374695 @default.
• W4377293878 creator A5088365435 @default.
• W4377293878 date "2023-07-05" @default.
• W4377293878 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4377293878 title "Psychiatric Treatment Conducted via Telemedicine Versus In-Person Modality in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Mood Disorders, and Anxiety Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
• W4377293878 cites W1583604872 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W1824233711 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W1965366132 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W1984398689 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W1990968034 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2014553305 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2017082471 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2020805549 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2031813334 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2081234327 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2091100319 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2099936397 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2130606351 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2136366797 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2157823046 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2166097570 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2171149159 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2290962969 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2298795642 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2403510820 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2407965127 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2441086629 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2463102023 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2490226874 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2530266489 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2557043813 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2884885455 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2917978091 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2950673227 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2990993692 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W2997263042 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W3013095303 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W3034201005 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W3034564209 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W3048989602 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W3095354079 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W3099387370 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W3118615836 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W3122369478 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W3188739130 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W4206388892 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W4207025750 @default.
• W4377293878 cites W4297497407 @default.
• W4377293878 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/44790" @default.
• W4377293878 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37277113" @default.
• W4377293878 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4377293878 type Work @default.
• W4377293878 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4377293878 countsByYear W43772938782023 @default.
• W4377293878 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4377293878 hasAuthorship W4377293878A5002610230 @default.
• W4377293878 hasAuthorship W4377293878A5016800161 @default.
• W4377293878 hasAuthorship W4377293878A5028791110 @default.
• W4377293878 hasAuthorship W4377293878A5032629708 @default.
• W4377293878 hasAuthorship W4377293878A5044344721 @default.
• W4377293878 hasAuthorship W4377293878A5052226585 @default.
• W4377293878 hasAuthorship W4377293878A5070379405 @default.
• W4377293878 hasAuthorship W4377293878A5082374695 @default.
• W4377293878 hasAuthorship W4377293878A5088365435 @default.
• W4377293878 hasBestOaLocation W43772938781 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C2776716344 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C2777134132 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C2779891985 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C2779911313 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C2780051608 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C2780733359 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConceptScore W4377293878C118552586 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConceptScore W4377293878C126322002 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConceptScore W4377293878C160735492 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConceptScore W4377293878C162324750 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConceptScore W4377293878C168563851 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConceptScore W4377293878C2776716344 @default.
• W4377293878 hasConceptScore W4377293878C2777134132 @default.

• next