Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4378640285> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4378640285 endingPage "e39219" @default.
- W4378640285 startingPage "e39219" @default.
- W4378640285 abstract "Background Symptom checkers (SCs) for laypersons’ self-assessment and preliminary self-diagnosis are widely used by the public. Little is known about the impact of these tools on health care professionals (HCPs) in primary care and their work. This is relevant to understanding how technological changes might affect the working world and how this is linked to work-related psychosocial demands and resources for HCPs. Objective This scoping review aimed to systematically explore the existing publications on the impacts of SCs on HCPs in primary care and to identify knowledge gaps. Methods We used the Arksey and O’Malley framework. We based our search string on the participant, concept, and context scheme and searched PubMed (MEDLINE) and CINAHL in January and June 2021. We performed a reference search in August 2021 and a manual search in November 2021. We included publications of peer-reviewed journals that focused on artificial intelligence- or algorithm-based self-diagnosing apps and tools for laypersons and had primary care or nonclinical settings as a relevant context. The characteristics of these studies were described numerically. We used thematic analysis to identify core themes. We followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist to report the study. Results Of the 2729 publications identified through initial and follow-up database searches, 43 full texts were screened for eligibility, of which 9 were included. Further 8 publications were included through manual search. Two publications were excluded after receiving feedback in the peer-review process. Fifteen publications were included in the final sample, which comprised 5 (33%) commentaries or nonresearch publications, 3 (20%) literature reviews, and 7 (47%) research publications. The earliest publications stemmed from 2015. We identified 5 themes. The theme finding prediagnosis comprised the comparison between SCs and physicians. We identified the performance of the diagnosis and the relevance of human factors as topics. In the theme layperson-technology relationship, we identified potentials for laypersons’ empowerment and harm through SCs. Our analysis showed potential disruptions of the physician-patient relationship and uncontested roles of HCPs in the theme (impacts on) physician-patient relationship. In the theme impacts on HCPs’ tasks, we described the reduction or increase in HCPs’ workload. We identified potential transformations of HCPs’ work and impacts on the health care system in the theme future role of SCs in health care. Conclusions The scoping review approach was suitable for this new field of research. The heterogeneity of technologies and wordings was challenging. We identified research gaps in the literature regarding the impact of artificial intelligence– or algorithm-based self-diagnosing apps or tools on the work of HCPs in primary care. Further empirical studies on HCPs’ lived experiences are needed, as the current literature depicts expectations rather than empirical findings." @default.
- W4378640285 created "2023-05-30" @default.
- W4378640285 creator A5051884386 @default.
- W4378640285 creator A5057221379 @default.
- W4378640285 creator A5063749432 @default.
- W4378640285 creator A5074165484 @default.
- W4378640285 creator A5074290792 @default.
- W4378640285 date "2023-05-29" @default.
- W4378640285 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W4378640285 title "Impacts of Symptom Checkers for Laypersons’ Self-diagnosis on Physicians in Primary Care: Scoping Review" @default.
- W4378640285 cites W1838071484 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W1969256959 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2019462239 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2058911863 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2075950485 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2079283960 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2091538045 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2105321265 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2108154693 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2127115650 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2256898650 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2261406464 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2753913077 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2793498096 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2884680014 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2893300601 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2899560923 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2905136983 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2913713488 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2923389169 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2939043544 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2955631679 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2965593496 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2971346768 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2977373448 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2982083314 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2988926962 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W2998720117 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3000239480 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3014520892 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3014631757 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3016592756 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3022563182 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3027887853 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3036422327 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3043076887 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3048817558 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3088354951 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3095938236 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3108779652 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3126060205 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3158890082 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3182482959 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3184842396 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3197603620 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3205636110 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3208298346 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W3216536017 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W4200073263 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W4234580964 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W4280553129 @default.
- W4378640285 cites W4322718967 @default.
- W4378640285 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/39219" @default.
- W4378640285 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37247214" @default.
- W4378640285 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4378640285 type Work @default.
- W4378640285 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4378640285 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4378640285 hasAuthorship W4378640285A5051884386 @default.
- W4378640285 hasAuthorship W4378640285A5057221379 @default.
- W4378640285 hasAuthorship W4378640285A5063749432 @default.
- W4378640285 hasAuthorship W4378640285A5074165484 @default.
- W4378640285 hasAuthorship W4378640285A5074290792 @default.
- W4378640285 hasBestOaLocation W43786402851 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C150966472 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W4378640285 hasConcept C50522688 @default.