FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4378803477> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4378803477 endingPage "648" @default.
• W4378803477 startingPage "641" @default.
• W4378803477 abstract "Aims Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) are complex procedures with higher rates of re-revision, complications, and mortality compared to primary TKA and THA. We report the effects of the establishment of a revision arthroplasty network (the East Midlands Specialist Orthopaedic Network; EMSON) on outcomes of rTKA and rTHA. Methods The revision arthroplasty network was established in January 2015 and covered five hospitals in the Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire areas of the East Midlands of England. This comprises a collaborative weekly multidisciplinary meeting where upcoming rTKA and rTHA procedures are discussed, and a plan agreed. Using the Hospital Episode Statistics database, revision procedures carried out between April 2011 and March 2018 (allowing two-year follow-up) from the five network hospitals were compared to all other hospitals in England. Age, sex, and mean Hospital Frailty Risk scores were used as covariates. The primary outcome was re-revision surgery within one year of the index revision. Secondary outcomes were re-revision surgery within two years, any complication within one and two years, and median length of hospital stay. Results A total of 57,621 rTHA and 33,828 rTKA procedures were performed across England, of which 1,485 (2.6%) and 1,028 (3.0%), respectively, were conducted within the network. Re-revision rates within one year for rTHA were 7.3% and 6.0%, and for rTKA were 11.6% and 7.4% pre- and postintervention, respectively, within the network. This compares to a pre-to-post change from 7.4% to 6.8% for rTHA and from 11.7% to 9.7% for rTKA for the rest of England. In comparative interrupted time-series analysis for rTKA there was a significant immediate improvement in one-year re-revision rates for the revision network compared to the rest of England (p = 0.024), but no significant change for rTHA (p = 0.504). For the secondary outcomes studied, there was a significant improvement in trend for one- and two-year complication rates for rTHA for the revision network compared to the rest of England. Conclusion Re-revision rates for rTKA and complication rates for rTHA improved significantly at one and two years with the introduction of a revision arthroplasty network, when compared to the rest of England. Most of the outcomes studied improved to a greater extent in the network hospitals compared to the rest of England when comparing the pre- and postintervention periods. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(6):641–648." @default.
• W4378803477 created "2023-06-01" @default.
• W4378803477 creator A5006645499 @default.
• W4378803477 creator A5017137147 @default.
• W4378803477 creator A5022926840 @default.
• W4378803477 creator A5024518041 @default.
• W4378803477 creator A5030226143 @default.
• W4378803477 creator A5037539072 @default.
• W4378803477 creator A5085337233 @default.
• W4378803477 date "2023-06-01" @default.
• W4378803477 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W4378803477 title "The impact of a revision arthroplasty network on patient outcomes" @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2048525801 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2051239218 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2065333990 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2097387720 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2098656653 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2194388361 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W222160557 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2259654619 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2260055920 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2287664562 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2560450975 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2585205152 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2793760584 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2802067770 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2884577264 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W2996815701 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3007746269 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3008898072 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3039703005 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3084123195 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3086066451 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3118272714 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3127259669 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3135329439 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3138467917 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3150819310 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3160546332 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3165886069 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3193896476 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W3198570082 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W4206039839 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W4210336301 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W4210643091 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W4220682902 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W4223920392 @default.
• W4378803477 cites W4284971902 @default.
• W4378803477 doi "https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.105b6.bjj-2022-0931.r1" @default.
• W4378803477 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37257848" @default.
• W4378803477 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4378803477 type Work @default.
• W4378803477 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4378803477 countsByYear W43788034772023 @default.
• W4378803477 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4378803477 hasAuthorship W4378803477A5006645499 @default.
• W4378803477 hasAuthorship W4378803477A5017137147 @default.
• W4378803477 hasAuthorship W4378803477A5022926840 @default.
• W4378803477 hasAuthorship W4378803477A5024518041 @default.
• W4378803477 hasAuthorship W4378803477A5030226143 @default.
• W4378803477 hasAuthorship W4378803477A5037539072 @default.
• W4378803477 hasAuthorship W4378803477A5085337233 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConcept C22467394 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConcept C3020736514 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConceptScore W4378803477C141071460 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConceptScore W4378803477C144024400 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConceptScore W4378803477C22467394 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConceptScore W4378803477C2778336525 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConceptScore W4378803477C3020736514 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConceptScore W4378803477C36289849 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConceptScore W4378803477C61434518 @default.
• W4378803477 hasConceptScore W4378803477C71924100 @default.
• W4378803477 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W4378803477 hasLocation W43788034771 @default.
• W4378803477 hasLocation W43788034772 @default.
• W4378803477 hasOpenAccess W4378803477 @default.
• W4378803477 hasPrimaryLocation W43788034771 @default.
• W4378803477 hasRelatedWork W2029624812 @default.
• W4378803477 hasRelatedWork W2066257651 @default.
• W4378803477 hasRelatedWork W2405993223 @default.
• W4378803477 hasRelatedWork W2441962935 @default.
• W4378803477 hasRelatedWork W2615362569 @default.
• W4378803477 hasRelatedWork W3035032397 @default.
• W4378803477 hasRelatedWork W3044297557 @default.
• W4378803477 hasRelatedWork W3082127840 @default.
• W4378803477 hasRelatedWork W4231372662 @default.
• W4378803477 hasRelatedWork W4248386022 @default.
• W4378803477 hasVolume "105-B" @default.
• W4378803477 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4378803477 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4378803477 workType "article" @default.