FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4378982693> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4378982693 abstract "The literature is replete with various approaches for the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), each with its own distinct advantages and disadvantages. None of these approaches, however, have been associated with superior operative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to measure the efficacy of three operative approaches to TMJ, namely superficial, subfascial, and deep subfascial approaches. The aim was to contrast selected intraoperative and postoperative outcomes among these surgical approaches.This was a prospective randomized clinical trial of subjects presenting to outpatient department. The primary predictor variables were three dissection planes of TMJ: Group-I (superficial), Group-II (subfascial), and Group-III (deep subfascial). The primary outcome variables were quality of surgical field employing fromme scale, dissection time in minutes, amount of blood loss in milliliters, and facial nerve function (FNF) using House-Brackmann scale. The secondary outcome variables were postoperative pain using visual-analog scale and swelling in millimeters measured on 1st, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days and quality of life using facial clinimetric evaluation questionnaire at 6-month follow-up. Age, gender, side, diagnosis, and type of surgery were the covariates. The data were analyzed using descriptive, comparative, and regression analysis. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant.The study included thirty subjects (8 males and 22 females) with various TMJ disorders ranging in age from 8 years to 65 years (mean 27.83 ± 10.52). On evaluation of intraoperative parameters, subfascial approach had statistically significant superior quality of surgical field (Group-I: 1.90 ± 0.57; Group-II: 1.10 ± 0.32; Group-III: 1.40 ± 0.52; P value = .006), statistically significant shortest dissection time (Group-I: 18.30 ± 3.74 min; Group-II: 13.240 ± 1.96 min; Group-III: 16.20 ± 1.99 min; with P value = .03), and statistically significant lower amount of blood loss compared with other groups (Group-I: 92.40 ± 4.74 ml: Group-II: 82.30 ± 3.77 ml; Group-III: 84.60 ± 3.06 ml; P value<.001). On assessment of postoperative parameters, only FNF of temporal branch showed statistically significant difference from 24 hours till 3 months with better outcome in deep subfascial approach. Mean scores of FNF at 24 hours and 1-week (Group-I: 4.20 ± 2.39; Group-II: 2.40 ± 2.27; Group-III: 1.50 ± 1.58 P = .02) and 1-month and 3-month (Group-I: 2.70 ± 1.82; Group-II: 1.20 ± 0.63; Group-III: 1.00 ± 0.00 P = .04).The subfascial approach significantly improved intraoperative outcomes and deep subfascial approach was comparatively safe with fewer incidence of facial nerve injury." @default.
• W4378982693 created "2023-06-02" @default.
• W4378982693 creator A5012489401 @default.
• W4378982693 creator A5045480155 @default.
• W4378982693 creator A5046100948 @default.
• W4378982693 creator A5049496301 @default.
• W4378982693 creator A5055908949 @default.
• W4378982693 creator A5091741126 @default.
• W4378982693 date "2023-06-01" @default.
• W4378982693 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4378982693 title "“Does the Exploration of the Temporomandibular Joint Using a Deep Subfascial Technique Result in a Superior Operative Outcome?”" @default.
• W4378982693 cites W1779088256 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W1914537908 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W1964382518 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W1988529875 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W1995203229 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2007071952 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2007721734 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2008211131 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2030899577 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2035362913 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2052762446 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2072573310 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2079153534 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2106299619 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2141934152 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2275843554 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2319253492 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2410044700 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2487750934 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2795515445 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2802929582 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W3046406862 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W3204565267 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W3206413981 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W4200098656 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W4255546425 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W4361744943 @default.
• W4378982693 cites W2114108861 @default.
• W4378982693 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2023.05.011" @default.
• W4378982693 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37315927" @default.
• W4378982693 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4378982693 type Work @default.
• W4378982693 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4378982693 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4378982693 hasAuthorship W4378982693A5012489401 @default.
• W4378982693 hasAuthorship W4378982693A5045480155 @default.
• W4378982693 hasAuthorship W4378982693A5046100948 @default.
• W4378982693 hasAuthorship W4378982693A5049496301 @default.
• W4378982693 hasAuthorship W4378982693A5055908949 @default.
• W4378982693 hasAuthorship W4378982693A5091741126 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConcept C2778987478 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConcept C2780202543 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConceptScore W4378982693C141071460 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConceptScore W4378982693C14184104 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConceptScore W4378982693C159110408 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConceptScore W4378982693C168563851 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConceptScore W4378982693C2775862295 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConceptScore W4378982693C2778987478 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConceptScore W4378982693C2779951463 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConceptScore W4378982693C2780202543 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConceptScore W4378982693C29694066 @default.
• W4378982693 hasConceptScore W4378982693C71924100 @default.
• W4378982693 hasLocation W43789826931 @default.
• W4378982693 hasLocation W43789826932 @default.
• W4378982693 hasOpenAccess W4378982693 @default.
• W4378982693 hasPrimaryLocation W43789826931 @default.
• W4378982693 hasRelatedWork W1972738221 @default.
• W4378982693 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W4378982693 hasRelatedWork W2015763791 @default.
• W4378982693 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W4378982693 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W4378982693 hasRelatedWork W2128244667 @default.
• W4378982693 hasRelatedWork W2409897387 @default.
• W4378982693 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W4378982693 hasRelatedWork W4254538705 @default.
• W4378982693 hasRelatedWork W4282923908 @default.
• W4378982693 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4378982693 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4378982693 workType "article" @default.