FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4379117470> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4379117470 abstract "Abstract Background Distal radius fractures (DRF) account for one in five bony injuries in both primary and secondary trauma care. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been adopted successfully for improvement and efficacy in numerous diseases; however, no study has demonstrated the different degrees of ERAS compliance on the short-term outcomes for distal radius surgery. We aimed to analyze whether different compliance degrees to the ERAS pathway are associated with improvement in patients with DRF. Methods We analyzed all consecutive patients with ERAS who underwent surgery for DRF at our department between May 2019 and October 2022 retrospectively. Their pre-, peri-, and post-operative compliance with the 22 elements of the ERAS program were assessed. We compared patient complications, the total length of hospitalization, the discharge time after surgery, hospital costs, times for return to preinjury level, times of the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score > 3 points during hospitalization, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores, and other parameters between low- (< 68.1%) and high-compliance (> 68.1%) groups. We performed multiple linear regression equations to assess the impact of ERAS compliance on the function level of the patients postoperatively (DASH scores). Results No significant differences were detected between the high- and low-compliance groups, with respect to the demographics, including the sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and comorbidity (P > 0.05). We observed significant differences between the high- and low-compliance groups in terms of the DASH score (32.25 ± 9.97 vs. 40.50 ± 15.65, p < 0.05) at 6 months postoperatively, the discharge time after surgery (2.45 ± 1.46 vs. 3.14 ± 1.50, p < 0.05), and times of VAS pain scores > 3 points during hospitalization (0.88, (0.44, 1.31), p < 0.05). Our study demonstrated a significant negative association between ERAS compliance and the function level of the patients postoperatively (DASH scores) when adjusted for the age, comorbidity, sex, and BMI. Conclusion This study can provide a realistic evaluation and comparison of the ERAS protocol among patients with DRF and eventually guide clinical decision making. The ERAS protocol might improve the medical quality and efficacy with high function levels, less pain and time after surgery without increased complication rate and hospital cost." @default.
• W4379117470 created "2023-06-03" @default.
• W4379117470 creator A5041934647 @default.
• W4379117470 creator A5042942359 @default.
• W4379117470 creator A5060349352 @default.
• W4379117470 creator A5078351262 @default.
• W4379117470 creator A5092072908 @default.
• W4379117470 creator A5092072909 @default.
• W4379117470 creator A5092072910 @default.
• W4379117470 date "2023-06-02" @default.
• W4379117470 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4379117470 title "Impact of ERAS Compliance on the Short-Term Outcomes for Distal Radius Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study" @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2017566567 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2018240443 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2019459945 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2088504937 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2141638526 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2159336066 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2236082128 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2302901787 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2573978544 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2616475523 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2739536098 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2760215864 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2790145016 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2883064547 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2898853428 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2920713811 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W2960539721 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W3002869547 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W3084153634 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W3114038450 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W3117258627 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W4213316922 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W4286209748 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W4286504481 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W4307496995 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W4317530478 @default.
• W4379117470 cites W4327893412 @default.
• W4379117470 doi "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3005533/v1" @default.
• W4379117470 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4379117470 type Work @default.
• W4379117470 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4379117470 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4379117470 hasAuthorship W4379117470A5041934647 @default.
• W4379117470 hasAuthorship W4379117470A5042942359 @default.
• W4379117470 hasAuthorship W4379117470A5060349352 @default.
• W4379117470 hasAuthorship W4379117470A5078351262 @default.
• W4379117470 hasAuthorship W4379117470A5092072908 @default.
• W4379117470 hasAuthorship W4379117470A5092072909 @default.
• W4379117470 hasAuthorship W4379117470A5092072910 @default.
• W4379117470 hasBestOaLocation W43791174701 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C17923572 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C2776090536 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C2779159551 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C2780073493 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C2780110798 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C2781460075 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C111919701 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C126322002 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C141071460 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C144024400 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C149923435 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C15744967 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C167135981 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C17923572 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C1862650 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C2776090536 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C2779159551 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C2780073493 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C2780084366 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C2780110798 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C2780221984 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C2781460075 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C41008148 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C71924100 @default.
• W4379117470 hasConceptScore W4379117470C77805123 @default.
• W4379117470 hasLocation W43791174701 @default.
• W4379117470 hasOpenAccess W4379117470 @default.
• W4379117470 hasPrimaryLocation W43791174701 @default.
• W4379117470 hasRelatedWork W2135349964 @default.
• W4379117470 hasRelatedWork W2554612586 @default.
• W4379117470 hasRelatedWork W2915041500 @default.
• W4379117470 hasRelatedWork W2969877828 @default.
• W4379117470 hasRelatedWork W3082076576 @default.
• W4379117470 hasRelatedWork W3087359479 @default.
• W4379117470 hasRelatedWork W4281774515 @default.

• next