FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4379792020> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4379792020 endingPage "259" @default.
• W4379792020 startingPage "235" @default.
• W4379792020 abstract "Between God and Google: Reflections on the Technology Project of the Society for the Arts, Religion and Contemporary Culture Erling Hope “…many people's recollected nightmares are soundless, with suggestions of thick glass or deep water and these media's effect on sound.” –David Foster Wallace Sniff In my working life, designing and fabricating objects and images for liturgical settings, I periodically spend long stretches at the computer. Drafting, administrating, perhaps researching, can require sometimes up to a month at the desk. This is usually followed by a more lengthy period in the studio actually making the thing, which is likely to be a physical, dusty, material process. Not long ago, having recently completed this desk‐work and having embarked on the journey of bringing the idea into the reality of the studio space, I found myself confronted with the somewhat tedious task of milling, on a drill press, the ends of some forty turned spindles. Care needed to be taken in setting the machine up, and after troubling through a series of progressively minute adjustments and test cuts, I was good to go. I ran the stack of spindles through the machine, one at a time. I then broke the machine down, loosening its fence and table in preparation for the next step. But I realized, a moment late, that the very first spindle, which I had pulled from the stack to use as a gauge, had been left aside while the others were milled. It remained, unmilled, at the side of the machine. I had forgotten to machine the 40th piece. Mildly vexed, I stepped back bodily. And I stepped back mentally. I faced the prospect of going through the lengthy set‐up process all over again, now the more demanding for having to duplicate the results of the others, exactly. Suspended, I found myself looking for the tab for “Edit > scroll down > Undo.” In the video monitor of my minds‐eye, I was looking for the “undo” tab to correct my mistake. This brief moment, which might have been so easily overlooked or forgotten, lingers with me these many years later. A fleeting instant in a workaday world, it seemed to encapsulate a larger process, a bigger story. I described this event to a friend who spends his entire worklife computer‐bound. He responded with his own anecdote of a related moment, suspended likewise in a bodega, staring at the melons stacked high along the produce aisle. He searched, he told me, for the “File > scroll‐down > Sniff” command. We all know it is happening. The digital revolution is changing us in ways both trivial and essential. From freedom of speech to addictive compulsion, from the role of relationships to the nature of reality, new technologies are shaping and informing wide swaths of human concern and endeavor. It is reapportioning agency and ability, coercion and compulsion, information and ignorance, in society at large and in each of us individually. Our relationships with our bodies, our attention spans and capacity for reflection; narrative structure and spatial reasoning; social cohesion and surveillance, knowledge and fellowship—all these basic human concerns are undergoing significant shifts. There is no shortage of commentary on these changes. Much of it supports the Solomonic claim that there is nothing fundamentally new to this dynamic, save the scale. Throughout history and even before it, our technologies have shaped the very substance of who we are. Socially, psychologically, and even anatomically, we have evolved to conform to the new worlds we create. These changes can be so deep and pervasive as to go essentially unnoticed. Even now, we struggle to understand the full impact of the cultivation of fire and the invention of language. While these observations have been written about widely, there has been, to date, little attention focused specifically on the ways in which we discuss the influences of technology and how these manners of speaking shape our experience. The Society for the Arts, Religion and Contemporary Culture has been engaged in an extended inquiry into the Influence of Technology on Religion and the Arts. As the name of the project suggests, as our own name affirms, we have been focusing on the influences..." @default.
• W4379792020 created "2023-06-09" @default.
• W4379792020 creator A5066848872 @default.
• W4379792020 date "2012-06-01" @default.
• W4379792020 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W4379792020 title "Between God and Google: Reflections on the Technology Project of the Society for the Arts, Religion and Contemporary Culture" @default.
• W4379792020 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cro.2012.a783298" @default.
• W4379792020 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W4379792020 type Work @default.
• W4379792020 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4379792020 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4379792020 hasAuthorship W4379792020A5066848872 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C2776545233 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C2778120072 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C2778171436 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C2780957641 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C45012715 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C70789860 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C107038049 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C124952713 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C127413603 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C138885662 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C142362112 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C144024400 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C153349607 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C19165224 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C27206212 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C2776545233 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C2778120072 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C2778171436 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C2780957641 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C29595303 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C45012715 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C70789860 @default.
• W4379792020 hasConceptScore W4379792020C78519656 @default.
• W4379792020 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4379792020 hasLocation W43797920201 @default.
• W4379792020 hasOpenAccess W4379792020 @default.
• W4379792020 hasPrimaryLocation W43797920201 @default.
• W4379792020 hasRelatedWork W126605272 @default.
• W4379792020 hasRelatedWork W151265580 @default.
• W4379792020 hasRelatedWork W2001909838 @default.
• W4379792020 hasRelatedWork W2095447851 @default.
• W4379792020 hasRelatedWork W2267313542 @default.
• W4379792020 hasRelatedWork W2564369190 @default.
• W4379792020 hasRelatedWork W2906802191 @default.
• W4379792020 hasRelatedWork W3176898965 @default.
• W4379792020 hasRelatedWork W3210045407 @default.
• W4379792020 hasRelatedWork W2788479171 @default.
• W4379792020 hasVolume "62" @default.
• W4379792020 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4379792020 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4379792020 workType "article" @default.