FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4380203487> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4380203487 endingPage "141" @default.
• W4380203487 startingPage "139" @default.
• W4380203487 abstract "Recently the scientific community has been the subject of much controversy due to some facts that have arisen. One was the withdrawal of journals by the Web of Science for not carrying out adequate peer review processes and publishing articles lacking in scientific rigor in exchange for high publication costs. In fact, it can be verified that it is common to find works that appear accepted just two or three days after the date of receipt, making it doubtful of an adequate review. Many advocate “Open Science” as the freedom to commu-nicate results without the consent of referees or the sometimes very rigorous requirements of scientific journals. Another example case was that of a researcher sanctioned by his Uni-versity for considering the excessive authorship of works published by the said individual in a very short time, which seems to be doubtful. It is common to find cases of researchers advising working groups from various countries outside their country of origin, perhaps only as statistical analysts or offering their recognized names to stimulate the citation of an in-stitution or country. It would then be appropriate to ask the question: What would be the number of publications that an author may have so that it is not suspected of gratifying or convenient authorship, for himself or for the institution to which he belongs? On the other hand, it is known that authorship of papers may be obtained in high-impact journals through payments or citations that do not correspond to the topic dealt with in the work. Indeed, we have discovered some contributions with out-of-context citations in Investigación Clínicathrough a rigorous analysis of the references. Worse still, it is the communication, carried out by any individual who is not an expert in a field, through the most popular social net-works, of concepts that deeply permeate public opinion in general, being transmitted as if they were proven facts and therein the danger, in the specific case of Medicine, damage to health. For all of the above, the Editors of scientific journals must be very vigilant and ready to discuss the advantages or inconveniences of modern initiatives, the influence of social media in disseminating information, and knowing how to interpret their impact on public health. On the other hand, Journals have to balance the role of citations and impact indexes in the projection of Science individuals, as some academic institutions in European (Spain) or Asian (China) countries are doing." @default.
• W4380203487 created "2023-06-11" @default.
• W4380203487 creator A5027558918 @default.
• W4380203487 date "2023-06-01" @default.
• W4380203487 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W4380203487 title "EDITORIAL. El dilema del Editor ante las circunstancias actuales de la comunicación científica." @default.
• W4380203487 doi "https://doi.org/10.54817/ic.v64n2a00" @default.
• W4380203487 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4380203487 type Work @default.
• W4380203487 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4380203487 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4380203487 hasAuthorship W4380203487A5027558918 @default.
• W4380203487 hasBestOaLocation W43802034871 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConcept C151719136 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConcept C2778979077 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConcept C41458344 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConceptScore W4380203487C136764020 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConceptScore W4380203487C151719136 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConceptScore W4380203487C161191863 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConceptScore W4380203487C17744445 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConceptScore W4380203487C199539241 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConceptScore W4380203487C2777855551 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConceptScore W4380203487C2778805511 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConceptScore W4380203487C2778979077 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConceptScore W4380203487C41008148 @default.
• W4380203487 hasConceptScore W4380203487C41458344 @default.
• W4380203487 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4380203487 hasLocation W43802034871 @default.
• W4380203487 hasOpenAccess W4380203487 @default.
• W4380203487 hasPrimaryLocation W43802034871 @default.
• W4380203487 hasRelatedWork W2010837550 @default.
• W4380203487 hasRelatedWork W2023352812 @default.
• W4380203487 hasRelatedWork W2089546080 @default.
• W4380203487 hasRelatedWork W2116739941 @default.
• W4380203487 hasRelatedWork W2131077656 @default.
• W4380203487 hasRelatedWork W2149464476 @default.
• W4380203487 hasRelatedWork W4244213304 @default.
• W4380203487 hasRelatedWork W4294082113 @default.
• W4380203487 hasRelatedWork W4323537851 @default.
• W4380203487 hasRelatedWork W2892189544 @default.
• W4380203487 hasVolume "64" @default.
• W4380203487 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4380203487 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4380203487 workType "article" @default.