FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4380489924> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4380489924 endingPage "831" @default.
• W4380489924 startingPage "823" @default.
• W4380489924 abstract "Introduction: Appendicitis is most common intra abdominal condition requiring emergency surgery. The life time rate of appendicectomy is 12% for men and 25% in women, with approximately 7% of all people undergoing appendicectomy for acute appendicitis during their lifetime. Laparoscopic appendicectomy combines the advantages of treatment and diagnosis in one procedure with the least morbidity3. Patients are likely to have less post operative pain and to be discharged from hospital and return to regular activities quicker than those who underwent an open appendicectomy Methodology: Patients admitted in surgical wards, with clinical diagnosis of acute or recurrent appendicitis for a period of one year. The following parameters were observed between the two procedures. Duration of procedure ,Postoperative pain,Duration of surgery in minutes, Postoperative complications and wound infection, Post operative length of hospital stay in number of days, Resumption of diet. Results: The gold standard treatment for acute appendicitis is appendicectomy. Though open appendicectomy remains gold standard, nowadays laparoscopic appendicectomy has gained a lot of importance now. Laparoscopic appendicectomy9 is equally safe and less postoperative pain and morbidity as compared to open appendicectomy. Laparoscopic appendicectomy is a useful procedure for reducing the hospital stay, return to work early, less complications encountered. With better training now in minimal access surgery now, laparoscopy has been popular now. Conclusion: On analysing the data, we found a definite difference in outcome between open and laparoscopic appendicectomy in consecutively selected patients. The laparoscopic appendicectomy was better than the open appendicectomy with respect to pain, postoperative complications like vomiting, and wound infection rate. Postoperative recovery was good in respect with duration of hospital stay, resumption of diet. The only drawback of laparoscopic appendicectomy was with the duration of surgery. However with the above mentioned advantages outweighs the time drawback for laparoscopic appendicectomy. Overall laparoscopic appendicectomy is better than open appendicectomy in selected patients with acute or recurrent appendicitis." @default.
• W4380489924 created "2023-06-14" @default.
• W4380489924 creator A5023566569 @default.
• W4380489924 date "2023-05-31" @default.
• W4380489924 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4380489924 title "A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY VERSUS OPEN APPENDICECTOMY IN TERMS OF DURATION OF SURGERY,LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAY,RESUMPTION OF DIET, POST OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN THANJAVUR MEDICAL COLLEGE A PROSPECTIVE STUDY" @default.
• W4380489924 doi "https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/16937" @default.
• W4380489924 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4380489924 type Work @default.
• W4380489924 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4380489924 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4380489924 hasAuthorship W4380489924A5023566569 @default.
• W4380489924 hasBestOaLocation W43804899241 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConcept C2780016130 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConcept C2780852908 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConcept C2780955771 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConcept C3018581240 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConceptScore W4380489924C126322002 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConceptScore W4380489924C141071460 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConceptScore W4380489924C2776111594 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConceptScore W4380489924C2780016130 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConceptScore W4380489924C2780047204 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConceptScore W4380489924C2780852908 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConceptScore W4380489924C2780955771 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConceptScore W4380489924C3018581240 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConceptScore W4380489924C40993552 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConceptScore W4380489924C61434518 @default.
• W4380489924 hasConceptScore W4380489924C71924100 @default.
• W4380489924 hasIssue "05" @default.
• W4380489924 hasLocation W43804899241 @default.
• W4380489924 hasOpenAccess W4380489924 @default.
• W4380489924 hasPrimaryLocation W43804899241 @default.
• W4380489924 hasRelatedWork W1667962409 @default.
• W4380489924 hasRelatedWork W2338462413 @default.
• W4380489924 hasRelatedWork W2403130035 @default.
• W4380489924 hasRelatedWork W2434750519 @default.
• W4380489924 hasRelatedWork W2588020417 @default.
• W4380489924 hasRelatedWork W2965143137 @default.
• W4380489924 hasRelatedWork W3190092139 @default.
• W4380489924 hasRelatedWork W4253866530 @default.
• W4380489924 hasRelatedWork W4283779772 @default.
• W4380489924 hasRelatedWork W648601548 @default.
• W4380489924 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W4380489924 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4380489924 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4380489924 workType "article" @default.