FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4380683922> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4380683922 endingPage "369" @default.
• W4380683922 startingPage "364" @default.
• W4380683922 abstract "Surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has had a remarkable technological development during the past 20 years. Microscopic discectomy has traditionally been the gold standard method to treat symptomatic LDH before the introduction of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD). The FELD procedure allows unsurpassed magnification and visualization and is currently the most minimally invasive surgical technique. In this study, FELD was compared with standard surgery for LDH, with a focus on medically relevant changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).The purpose of this study was to investigate whether FELD is noninferior to other surgical methods for LDH surgery in the most common PROMs, including postoperative leg pain and disability, while still reaching the necessary thresholds for relevant clinical and medical improvements.Patients undergoing a FELD procedure at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, between 2013 to 2018 were included. A total of 80 (41 men and 39 women) patients were enrolled. The FELD patients were matched 1:5 to controls from the Swedish spine register (Swespine) who had a standard microscopic or mini-open discectomy surgery. PROMs, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), as well as the patient acceptable symptom states (PASS) and the minimal important change (MIC), were used to compare the efficacy of the 2 surgical approaches.The FELD group achieved medically relevant and significant improvements noninferior to standard surgery within the predefined thresholds of MIC and PASS. No differences could be found in disability measured by ODI FELD -28.4 (SD 19.2) vs standard surgery -28.7 (SD 18.9) or leg pain NRSLeg FELD -4.35 (SD 2.93) vs standard surgery -4.99 (SD 3.12). All intragroup score changes were significant.The FELD results are not inferior to standard surgery 1 year postoperatively after LDH surgery. There were no medically significant differences regarding MIC achieved or final PASS in any of the measured PROMs, including leg pain, back pain, or disability (ODI) between the surgical methods.The present study highlights that FELD is noninferior to standard surgery in clinically relevant PROMs." @default.
• W4380683922 created "2023-06-15" @default.
• W4380683922 creator A5018697208 @default.
• W4380683922 creator A5062705668 @default.
• W4380683922 creator A5077234258 @default.
• W4380683922 creator A5079216455 @default.
• W4380683922 date "2023-06-01" @default.
• W4380683922 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4380683922 title "Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy vs Standard Discectomy: A Noninferiority Study on Clinically Relevant Changes" @default.
• W4380683922 cites W1607294858 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W1971479784 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2006711001 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2030430403 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2032397127 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2047321797 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2057938392 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2059808083 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2060663061 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2090212655 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2094528068 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2110152581 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2150324393 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2254066813 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2419412666 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2464017905 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2570326583 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2763457129 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2765463455 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2776145396 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2989808552 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W2998953385 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W3023878542 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W3046621791 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W3121502991 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W3131945005 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W3132431218 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W3134776938 @default.
• W4380683922 cites W4213053824 @default.
• W4380683922 doi "https://doi.org/10.14444/8458" @default.
• W4380683922 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37315994" @default.
• W4380683922 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4380683922 type Work @default.
• W4380683922 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4380683922 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4380683922 hasAuthorship W4380683922A5018697208 @default.
• W4380683922 hasAuthorship W4380683922A5062705668 @default.
• W4380683922 hasAuthorship W4380683922A5077234258 @default.
• W4380683922 hasAuthorship W4380683922A5079216455 @default.
• W4380683922 hasBestOaLocation W43806839221 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C2776008035 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C2777364248 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C63363279 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C126322002 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C126838900 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C131872663 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C141071460 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C14184104 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C142724271 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C1862650 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C204787440 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C2775998654 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C2776008035 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C2777364248 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C2780907711 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C40993552 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C44575665 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C63363279 @default.
• W4380683922 hasConceptScore W4380683922C71924100 @default.
• W4380683922 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4380683922 hasLocation W43806839221 @default.
• W4380683922 hasLocation W43806839222 @default.
• W4380683922 hasOpenAccess W4380683922 @default.
• W4380683922 hasPrimaryLocation W43806839221 @default.
• W4380683922 hasRelatedWork W2077680117 @default.
• W4380683922 hasRelatedWork W2354943008 @default.
• W4380683922 hasRelatedWork W2726695704 @default.
• W4380683922 hasRelatedWork W2792326534 @default.
• W4380683922 hasRelatedWork W2888241701 @default.
• W4380683922 hasRelatedWork W2910631026 @default.
• W4380683922 hasRelatedWork W3136362931 @default.
• W4380683922 hasRelatedWork W3184665012 @default.
• W4380683922 hasRelatedWork W3204397914 @default.
• W4380683922 hasRelatedWork W2900965759 @default.
• W4380683922 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W4380683922 isParatext "false" @default.

• next