FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4380762657> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4380762657 endingPage "395" @default.
• W4380762657 startingPage "394" @default.
• W4380762657 abstract "Every year, residency and fellowship programs create rank order lists (ROLs) that organize applicants by preference, with the most desirable candidates at the top. This ranking serves as a proxy of predicted performance within the environment of that residency program.1,2 The Henry Ford Hospital Emergency Medicine and Transitional Year programs traditionally created ROLs using quantified data from a candidate's application (file score) added to an average interview score to calculate a composite score. One problem with this approach was that a candidate with a high file score and low interview score would rank similarly to a candidate with modest file and interview scores, even though the latter candidate likely had less risk and was therefore more desirable. In addition, this method was inefficient, as lengthy discussions often compared adjacent candidates who were likely to perform equally well. Several years ago, we modified our ROL creation process to address these issues and improve efficiency. We designed a risk-based, criterion-referenced approach called the “Jackson 5” (J5) method for creating ROLs.J5 involves a fundamental change in the approach to ROL creation. Rather than compare candidates to each other and rank them, each candidate is independently assessed on their probability of success in the residency based on their application and interview. Candidates with the most desirable applications are assigned the letter code “A,” indicating that these candidates will likely require minimal academic guidance during residency (Table). Similarly, candidates with poor communication skills or values that do not align with the program's mission are assigned the numeric code “4.” Each candidate is therefore assigned to 1 of 16 J5 cohorts ranging from “A1” to “D4.”On the initial ROL, the cohorts are ranked in the order predetermined by the program faculty (A1, B1, A2, B2, C1, C2, A3, B3, C3, D1, A4, D2, B4, C4, D3, D4). The faculty then review the ROL with the understanding that candidates within a cohort will likely perform similarly as residents, and the individual rank of each candidate within a cohort is less important. The final ROL discussion focuses around whether a candidate was assigned to the correct cohort instead of how they compare to adjacent candidates.We have used J5 since 2017. To measure the effort required to finalize an ROL, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient between initial and final ROLs for 4 sequential recruitment cycles. Initial ROLs were created using the traditional method (TRAD, comparing candidates to each other and ranking using a composite scoring system) and using the J5 system (J5ROL, described above). After creation of each initial ROL, faculty had a detailed discussion to create a final ROL (FIN). We hypothesized that if the J5ROL-FIN correlation was better than the TRAD-FIN correlation, it implied that less effort was required to finalize and submit a ROL to the Match. Our results confirmed this, as J5ROL-FIN correlation was 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.90) compared to 0.81 for TRAD-FIN (95% CI 0.78-0.84; P<.001).A faculty survey revealed broad acceptance of J5 and preference over the traditional method. For example, 75% (9 of 12) agreed that J5 was more efficient compared to the traditional method, and 71% (10 of 14) felt that J5 allowed them to adequately express their opinion on candidates.In conclusion, J5 provides an efficient, feasible, and acceptable framework to create a ROL. Any site or specialty may implement this because it only requires a rethinking of the approach to comparing candidates and developing program-specific application and interview cohort criteria. We hope that it helps residency programs better recruit candidates aligned with their program mission." @default.
• W4380762657 created "2023-06-16" @default.
• W4380762657 creator A5022085577 @default.
• W4380762657 creator A5059867709 @default.
• W4380762657 creator A5060634934 @default.
• W4380762657 date "2023-06-01" @default.
• W4380762657 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W4380762657 title "The Jackson 5 System for Creating Rank Order Lists: Easy as A-B-C, 1-2-3" @default.
• W4380762657 cites W2138252946 @default.
• W4380762657 cites W4220656825 @default.
• W4380762657 doi "https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-22-00776.1" @default.
• W4380762657 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37363658" @default.
• W4380762657 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4380762657 type Work @default.
• W4380762657 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4380762657 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4380762657 hasAuthorship W4380762657A5022085577 @default.
• W4380762657 hasAuthorship W4380762657A5059867709 @default.
• W4380762657 hasAuthorship W4380762657A5060634934 @default.
• W4380762657 hasBestOaLocation W43807626571 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C164226766 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C2780148112 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConcept C45235069 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C10138342 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C114614502 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C119857082 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C124101348 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C162324750 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C164226766 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C182306322 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C189430467 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C23123220 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C2780148112 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C33923547 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C41008148 @default.
• W4380762657 hasConceptScore W4380762657C45235069 @default.
• W4380762657 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4380762657 hasLocation W43807626571 @default.
• W4380762657 hasLocation W43807626572 @default.
• W4380762657 hasOpenAccess W4380762657 @default.
• W4380762657 hasPrimaryLocation W43807626571 @default.
• W4380762657 hasRelatedWork W161140159 @default.
• W4380762657 hasRelatedWork W2000300218 @default.
• W4380762657 hasRelatedWork W2122840831 @default.
• W4380762657 hasRelatedWork W2159863659 @default.
• W4380762657 hasRelatedWork W2294661159 @default.
• W4380762657 hasRelatedWork W2483845706 @default.
• W4380762657 hasRelatedWork W2616404935 @default.
• W4380762657 hasRelatedWork W2907831342 @default.
• W4380762657 hasRelatedWork W3199233695 @default.
• W4380762657 hasRelatedWork W4283836875 @default.
• W4380762657 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W4380762657 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4380762657 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4380762657 workType "article" @default.