FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4380875089> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4380875089 endingPage "141" @default.
• W4380875089 startingPage "137" @default.
• W4380875089 abstract "Aim: To evaluate and compare the effect of conventional and truss access cavity preparations on remaining dentin thickness (RDT), canal transportation, and centering ability in mandibular molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Ethical approval was obtained before the commencement of the study. Thirty extracted mandibular molars were selected, disinfected, and stored in normal saline. Preoperative CBCT scans were taken for all the samples and randomly divided into two groups. (n = 15). Group A; Conventional access preparation group; Group B; Truss access preparation group. Cleaning and shaping were performed with the mesiobuccal canal of all the samples. Postoperative CBCT scans were compared with preoperative CBCT scans to evaluate the RDT, canal transportation, and canal centering ability in mandibular molar with conventional and truss access cavity preparation. Results: Data obtained from CBCT were analyzed by independent sample t-test with the P < 0.05 and found that RDT was higher in Group A as compared to Group B at the 3 and 9 mm levels, whereas it was higher in Group B at 6 mm level in both the mesial and distal side, but it was statistically insignificant at 3, 6, and 9 mm level. Canal transportation was higher in Group B than in Group A, but it was statistically insignificant at 6 and 9 mm levels but statistically significant at 3 mm. Canal centering ability was higher in Group A than in Group B, but it was not statistically significant at 3, 6, and 9 mm levels. Conclusion: Regarding RDT and canal centering ability, there is no statistically significant difference at all levels. Both groups present a statistically significant difference at 3 mm from the apex when comparing canal transportation. This suggests that conventional access cavity preparation is better than truss access preparation to maintain original canal anatomy." @default.
• W4380875089 created "2023-06-17" @default.
• W4380875089 creator A5036277760 @default.
• W4380875089 creator A5046493664 @default.
• W4380875089 creator A5047587650 @default.
• W4380875089 creator A5059612116 @default.
• W4380875089 date "2023-01-01" @default.
• W4380875089 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4380875089 title "Comparative evaluation of the effect of conventional and truss access cavities on remaining dentin thickness, canal transportation, and canal centering ability in mandibular molars using cone-beam computed tomography" @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2021246628 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2072696124 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2555941598 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2738416686 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2767111873 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2781472489 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2782898702 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2803192439 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2805469294 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2849396091 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2898761635 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W2901517610 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W3036651228 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W3047979135 @default.
• W4380875089 cites W3142088190 @default.
• W4380875089 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_161_22" @default.
• W4380875089 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4380875089 type Work @default.
• W4380875089 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4380875089 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4380875089 hasAuthorship W4380875089A5036277760 @default.
• W4380875089 hasAuthorship W4380875089A5046493664 @default.
• W4380875089 hasAuthorship W4380875089A5047587650 @default.
• W4380875089 hasAuthorship W4380875089A5059612116 @default.
• W4380875089 hasBestOaLocation W43808750891 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConcept C2779263046 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConcept C2779813781 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConceptScore W4380875089C141071460 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConceptScore W4380875089C199343813 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConceptScore W4380875089C202271784 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConceptScore W4380875089C2779263046 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConceptScore W4380875089C2779813781 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConceptScore W4380875089C29694066 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConceptScore W4380875089C2989005 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConceptScore W4380875089C544519230 @default.
• W4380875089 hasConceptScore W4380875089C71924100 @default.
• W4380875089 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4380875089 hasLocation W43808750891 @default.
• W4380875089 hasLocation W43808750892 @default.
• W4380875089 hasOpenAccess W4380875089 @default.
• W4380875089 hasPrimaryLocation W43808750891 @default.
• W4380875089 hasRelatedWork W2015709294 @default.
• W4380875089 hasRelatedWork W2038564597 @default.
• W4380875089 hasRelatedWork W2049586819 @default.
• W4380875089 hasRelatedWork W2205197490 @default.
• W4380875089 hasRelatedWork W2340479571 @default.
• W4380875089 hasRelatedWork W2371967455 @default.
• W4380875089 hasRelatedWork W2410936796 @default.
• W4380875089 hasRelatedWork W2553180308 @default.
• W4380875089 hasRelatedWork W3111473991 @default.
• W4380875089 hasRelatedWork W52440248 @default.
• W4380875089 hasVolume "35" @default.
• W4380875089 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4380875089 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4380875089 workType "article" @default.