Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4380898714> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 63 of
63
with 100 items per page.
- W4380898714 abstract "The previous genre-based studies have emphasized the rhetorical organization of the discussion section in research articles or thesis writing. The present study extends this trend by exploring the argumentative structure and its link to stance-taking features in the discussion part-genre written by both expert and student writers. Two corpora were compiled, including discussion samples taken from published research articles and those chosen from Master’s theses in applied linguistics. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted to identify any differences and similarities between the two groups of writers in terms of their organization of argumentative structure and the stance-taking manner. The results demonstrated that expert and student writers significantly differ in the manipulation of supporting evidence albeit their similar tendency to craft claim-evidence link. The significant differences were particularly found in the realization of interpretive arguments, with student writers employing more use of reason-result pattern whereas established writers presenting the higher occurrence of concessive clauses to reinforce the strength of arguments. Besides, the study also revealed that student writers tend to favor more numerical data while expert writers show greater preferences for generalized evidential and research evaluation to seek support for knowledge claims. Furthermore, the analysis of stance markers highlighted that stance-taking devices are inextricably interwoven with the claim-evidence link, with hedges and self-mentions predominantly serving for the interpretive evidence, attitude markers for both evidential and evaluative labels, and boosters for claim sets and factual evidence. Statistically significant differences between two corpora were also observed across the allocation of stance markers in relation to argumentative structures. The findings of the study have both theoretical and pedagogical implications for EAP writing instruction and learning needs." @default.
- W4380898714 created "2023-06-17" @default.
- W4380898714 creator A5064317742 @default.
- W4380898714 creator A5075754512 @default.
- W4380898714 date "2023-02-04" @default.
- W4380898714 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W4380898714 title "Modeling Claim - Evidence - Stance link in the Discussion Section of Research Genres: A Comparative Case Study of Expert and Student Writers in Applied Linguistics" @default.
- W4380898714 doi "https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20230901.11" @default.
- W4380898714 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4380898714 type Work @default.
- W4380898714 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4380898714 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4380898714 hasAuthorship W4380898714A5064317742 @default.
- W4380898714 hasAuthorship W4380898714A5075754512 @default.
- W4380898714 hasBestOaLocation W43808987141 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C167055898 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C192562157 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C2779732396 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C2780129039 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C2781089630 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C2781306805 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C105795698 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C111472728 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C111919701 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C138885662 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C15744967 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C166957645 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C167055898 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C192562157 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C2779732396 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C2780129039 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C2781089630 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C2781306805 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C33923547 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C41008148 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C41895202 @default.
- W4380898714 hasConceptScore W4380898714C95457728 @default.
- W4380898714 hasLocation W43808987141 @default.
- W4380898714 hasOpenAccess W4380898714 @default.
- W4380898714 hasPrimaryLocation W43808987141 @default.
- W4380898714 hasRelatedWork W2087212164 @default.
- W4380898714 hasRelatedWork W221909232 @default.
- W4380898714 hasRelatedWork W2342905139 @default.
- W4380898714 hasRelatedWork W2367125918 @default.
- W4380898714 hasRelatedWork W2469012725 @default.
- W4380898714 hasRelatedWork W2527885804 @default.
- W4380898714 hasRelatedWork W2591463254 @default.
- W4380898714 hasRelatedWork W2792684537 @default.
- W4380898714 hasRelatedWork W2972474420 @default.
- W4380898714 hasRelatedWork W4285183511 @default.
- W4380898714 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4380898714 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4380898714 workType "article" @default.