FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4381197878> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4381197878 abstract "Tracheal intubation is a life-saving intervention, and optimizing the patient's head and neck position for the best glottic view is a crucial step that accelerates the procedure. The left head rotation maneuver has been recently described as an innovative alternative to the traditional sniffing position used for tracheal intubation with marked improvement in glottic visualization.This study compared the glottic view and intubating conditions in the sniffing position versus left head rotation during direct laryngoscopy.This randomized, open-label clinical trial enrolled 52 adult patients admitted to Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center from September 2020 to January 2021 for an elective surgical procedure requiring tracheal intubation under general anesthesia. Intubation was done using a 45° left head rotation in the experimental group (n=26), while the control group (n=26) was intubated using the conventional sniffing position. Glottic visualization and intubation difficulty with the two procedures were assessed using the Cormack-Lehane grade and Intubation Difficulty Scale, respectively. Successful intubation is measured by observing a capnographic waveform in the end-tidal CO2 monitor after placement of the endotracheal tube.There was no statistically significant difference in the Cormack-Lehane grade, with 85% (n=44) of patients classified under grades 1 (n=11 and n=15) and 2 (n=11 and n=7) in the left head rotation and sniffing position groups, respectively. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in the Intubation Difficulty Scale scores of patients intubated with left head rotation or sniffing position; 30.7% (n=8) of patients in both groups were easily intubated, while 53.8% (n=14) in left head rotation and 57.6% (n=15) in sniffing position groups were intubated with slight difficulty. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the 2 techniques in any of the 7 parameters of the Intubation Difficulty Scale, although numerically fewer patients required the application of additional lifting force (n=7, 26.9% vs n=11, 42.3%) or laryngeal pressure (n=3, 11.5% vs n=7, 26.9%) when intubated with left head rotation. The intubation success rate with left head rotation was 92.3% versus 100% in the sniffing position, but this difference was not statistically significant.Left head rotation produces comparable laryngeal exposure and intubation ease to the conventional sniffing position. Therefore, left head rotation may be an alternative for patients who cannot be intubated in the sniffing position, especially in hospitals where advanced techniques such as video laryngoscopes and flexible bronchoscopes are unavailable, as is the case in this study. However, since our sample size was small, studies with a larger study population are warranted to establish the generalizability of our findings. In addition, we observed inadequate familiarity among anesthesiologists with the left head rotation technique, and the intubation success rate may improve as practitioners attain greater technical familiarization.International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN)ISRCTN23442026; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN23442026." @default.
• W4381197878 created "2023-06-20" @default.
• W4381197878 creator A5011276827 @default.
• W4381197878 creator A5077812105 @default.
• W4381197878 creator A5079720549 @default.
• W4381197878 date "2022-09-08" @default.
• W4381197878 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4381197878 title "Left Head Rotation as Alternative to Difficult Tracheal Intubation: Randomized Open Label Clinical Trial (Preprint)" @default.
• W4381197878 cites W1508565572 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W1570908401 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W1848714550 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W1917429525 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W1973132844 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W1990722352 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W1995437369 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2006028462 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2007819006 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2018608722 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2026061465 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2027602965 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2029999066 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2044311474 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2049359303 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2049451313 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2054789422 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2058366618 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2079938651 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2100858040 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2121764357 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2122100741 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2128060478 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2137999142 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2139241603 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2162451123 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2167962458 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2173578770 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2234906736 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2429313918 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2435621477 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2488731128 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2555780761 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2564949138 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2607399205 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2612244406 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2789029205 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2790034368 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2793710367 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2884992757 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2913828670 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2914135558 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2968280140 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2969774265 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2971176335 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2972253848 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W2991674482 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W342826820 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W4225863704 @default.
• W4381197878 cites W99728 @default.
• W4381197878 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/42500" @default.
• W4381197878 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37335071" @default.
• W4381197878 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4381197878 type Work @default.
• W4381197878 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4381197878 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4381197878 hasAuthorship W4381197878A5011276827 @default.
• W4381197878 hasAuthorship W4381197878A5077812105 @default.
• W4381197878 hasAuthorship W4381197878A5079720549 @default.
• W4381197878 hasBestOaLocation W43811978781 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConcept C131722271 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConcept C2776888792 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConcept C2778029997 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConcept C2780474809 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConcept C2781447300 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConceptScore W4381197878C105702510 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConceptScore W4381197878C131722271 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConceptScore W4381197878C141071460 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConceptScore W4381197878C168563851 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConceptScore W4381197878C2776888792 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConceptScore W4381197878C2778029997 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConceptScore W4381197878C2778716859 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConceptScore W4381197878C2780474809 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConceptScore W4381197878C2781447300 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConceptScore W4381197878C42219234 @default.
• W4381197878 hasConceptScore W4381197878C71924100 @default.
• W4381197878 hasLocation W43811978781 @default.
• W4381197878 hasLocation W43811978782 @default.
• W4381197878 hasOpenAccess W4381197878 @default.
• W4381197878 hasPrimaryLocation W43811978781 @default.
• W4381197878 hasRelatedWork W1508565572 @default.
• W4381197878 hasRelatedWork W1995437369 @default.
• W4381197878 hasRelatedWork W2028997017 @default.
• W4381197878 hasRelatedWork W2397273860 @default.
• W4381197878 hasRelatedWork W2607399205 @default.
• W4381197878 hasRelatedWork W2620780731 @default.

• next