FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4381330429> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4381330429 abstract "Abstract The performance of friction reducers in standard flow loops is a function of the specific friction reducer, environmental factors such as brine composition and fluid temperature, and the unique loop design and run procedure. This study examines the performance of various commercial and experimental friction reducers using Design of Experiments with variables of friction reducer loading expressed in gallons per thousand gallons, brine Total Dissolved Solids expressed in parts per million, and R+ Hardness expressed as the mole ratio of cationic hardness ions to the Total Dissolved Solids in decimal percentage. The ultimate percent friction reduction is generally dependent upon these variables, and each friction reducer generates unique profiles used to predict performance within the above variable space. This study evaluated 12 inverse emulsion friction reducers of various charge types in a 100 foot once through pipe. For this design of study, the Total Dissolved Solids was varied from 5,000 to 150,000 parts per million, the R+ Hardness varied from 0.0 to 0.3, and the friction reducer loading varied from 0.25 to 1.00 gallons per thousand gallons. Each reducer was injected into a reservoir containing a brine with the previously referenced, pre-established levels of Total Dissolved Solids and R+ Hardness, and the resulting maximum percentage friction reduction calculated by standard differential pressure protocol. The response surfaces generated had Ajusted-R2 values from 0.86 to 0.99 demonstrating an exceptionally good fit for the chosen regression model. The contour profiles expressed a general similarity between related charge types with type of charge significantly influencing the response surface profile. Typically, as friction reducer loading increased, percent friction reduction increased or a maximum plateau was achieved, or performance declined. Certain friction reducers’ performances increased as Total Dissolved Solids and/or R+ Hardness increased whereas many reducers’ performances decreased. The gradient of the response surfaces varied from linear progressing to cubic functions with arithmetic transformations. How friction loop results transmute to full scale hydraulic fracturing operations is not yet fully understood and no delineated process currently exists. However, mapping response surfaces of specific friction reducers then comparing responses to other friction reducers’ response data provides insight and can articulate how reducers’ performances are affected by friction reducer loading, TDS, and R+ Hardness, particularly in operations involving highly variable water quality. As brine character can vary during a hydraulic fractioning treatment, the best practice may be to either use a friction reducer known to perform well within the expected brine level or anticipate using multiple friction reducers for a specific treatment." @default.
• W4381330429 created "2023-06-21" @default.
• W4381330429 creator A5012015791 @default.
• W4381330429 creator A5037247107 @default.
• W4381330429 creator A5085548633 @default.
• W4381330429 date "2023-06-21" @default.
• W4381330429 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4381330429 title "Assessment of Friction Reducer Performance Within a Continuous Brine Spectrum" @default.
• W4381330429 cites W2006654869 @default.
• W4381330429 cites W2087650890 @default.
• W4381330429 cites W3094132723 @default.
• W4381330429 cites W3215370016 @default.
• W4381330429 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/213885-ms" @default.
• W4381330429 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4381330429 type Work @default.
• W4381330429 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4381330429 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4381330429 hasAuthorship W4381330429A5012015791 @default.
• W4381330429 hasAuthorship W4381330429A5037247107 @default.
• W4381330429 hasAuthorship W4381330429A5085548633 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C129360787 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C2776957854 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C2776985865 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C2778123984 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C28961703 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C87717796 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C121332964 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C129360787 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C178790620 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C185592680 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C192562407 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C2776957854 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C2776985865 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C2778123984 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C28961703 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C39432304 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C87717796 @default.
• W4381330429 hasConceptScore W4381330429C97355855 @default.
• W4381330429 hasLocation W43813304291 @default.
• W4381330429 hasOpenAccess W4381330429 @default.
• W4381330429 hasPrimaryLocation W43813304291 @default.
• W4381330429 hasRelatedWork W1993717340 @default.
• W4381330429 hasRelatedWork W2003094959 @default.
• W4381330429 hasRelatedWork W2350946365 @default.
• W4381330429 hasRelatedWork W2389860958 @default.
• W4381330429 hasRelatedWork W2391929720 @default.
• W4381330429 hasRelatedWork W2887283957 @default.
• W4381330429 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4381330429 hasRelatedWork W2982539715 @default.
• W4381330429 hasRelatedWork W2997313089 @default.
• W4381330429 hasRelatedWork W4323305374 @default.
• W4381330429 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4381330429 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4381330429 workType "article" @default.