FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4381542603> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4381542603 endingPage "101266" @default.
• W4381542603 startingPage "101266" @default.
• W4381542603 abstract "Evaluating Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) from the perspective of radiologists can provide valuable insights into the system's strengths and weaknesses, enabling designers to receive feedback and make improvements accordingly. As user acceptance is critical for the successful implementation of information systems, it is important to identify the views of radiologists on PACS. Discovering the users' perspectives can help identify possible system weaknesses and provide feedback to designers. This cross-sectional survey study involved radiologists and radiology residents working in two teaching hospitals that used different PACS. A total of 138 participants were included in the study using a census method. A standard questionnaire comprising 40 items based on a three-option Likert scale (disagree, no idea, and agree) was used to collect data, which was divided into four sections. After translation, the content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed (CVI>0.9), and its reliability was confirmed by a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.71. The data were analyzed using SPSS software, and the mean score for each item was calculated. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the mean scores of each section between the two PACS. Radiologists identified better education for medical students as the most significant advantage of PACS. Almost 90% of radiologists believed that PACS met their expectations for patient care and improved care delivery. The biggest challenge of PACS was the continued dependence on paper after implementation, rather than being entirely paperless. According to radiologists, PACS B had a more significant impact on patient care and posed fewer challenges than PACS A (P value < 0.01). Based on radiologists' perspectives, PACS improves care delivery and patients' satisfaction compared to traditional film-based systems, while also reducing patient care costs by eliminating the need for film and paper. However, the system faces several challenges, such as poor image quality and slow processing speeds. The use of appropriate infrastructure to implement the system could be one solution to these challenges." @default.
• W4381542603 created "2023-06-22" @default.
• W4381542603 creator A5004135091 @default.
• W4381542603 creator A5041997210 @default.
• W4381542603 creator A5051437242 @default.
• W4381542603 creator A5092227755 @default.
• W4381542603 creator A5092227756 @default.
• W4381542603 date "2023-01-01" @default.
• W4381542603 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4381542603 title "Evaluation of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS): Radiologists’ perspective" @default.
• W4381542603 cites W1535365635 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W1963838099 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W1990025709 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W1995592876 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W1997829318 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2023292344 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2028806801 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2036217540 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2036500693 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2040938292 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2044685624 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2047119130 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2074721633 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2079565042 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2101538869 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2109290891 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2127749051 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2150596136 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2154716835 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2157177697 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2340704876 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2436121791 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2472970386 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2523748375 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2770637235 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2807140035 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2807421428 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2891455285 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2902736031 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2927203543 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2946272275 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W2988684531 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W3047029788 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W3095385821 @default.
• W4381542603 cites W3114738268 @default.
• W4381542603 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101266" @default.
• W4381542603 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4381542603 type Work @default.
• W4381542603 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4381542603 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4381542603 hasAuthorship W4381542603A5004135091 @default.
• W4381542603 hasAuthorship W4381542603A5041997210 @default.
• W4381542603 hasAuthorship W4381542603A5051437242 @default.
• W4381542603 hasAuthorship W4381542603A5092227755 @default.
• W4381542603 hasAuthorship W4381542603A5092227756 @default.
• W4381542603 hasBestOaLocation W43815426031 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C10795825 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C63882131 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C105776082 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C106906290 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C10795825 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C121332964 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C12713177 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C138496976 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C154945302 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C15744967 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C163258240 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C171606756 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C19527891 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C41008148 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C43214815 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C49774154 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C509550671 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C62520636 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C63882131 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C70410870 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C71924100 @default.
• W4381542603 hasConceptScore W4381542603C77805123 @default.
• W4381542603 hasFunder F4320322245 @default.
• W4381542603 hasLocation W43815426031 @default.

• next