Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4381570628> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 items per page.
- W4381570628 endingPage "142" @default.
- W4381570628 startingPage "128" @default.
- W4381570628 abstract "<p xmlns=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1>Beliefs about conflict and uncertainty over felt emotions—for Joy, Pride, Sadness, Jealousy and Envy events—were studied by means of Yes/No and Why questions. Each participant (N = 1,156) judged a typical antecedent for a single emotion—e.g., Jealousy: story protagonist SP sees his or her partner kiss someone. The Yes/No results showed that SP was frequently expected to experience both phenomena, the more so the greater the event impact (Yes range: 40–86%). Beliefs associated with Yes answers (BY) were categorized into 4 categories: (BY1) reason-emotion opposition—felt emotions are unreasonable, inadequate ways of reacting; (BY2) ambivalent emotions—e.g., joy and sadness; (BY3) unclear emotions; (BY4) other causes—e.g., focused on event implications, SP’s personality. No conflict or uncertainty answers (BN; range 14–60%) mirrored BY categories: (BN1) no reason-emotion opposition, (BN2) no ambivalent emotions, (BN3) clear emotions, (BN4) other causes. Attributions and beliefs about causes did not generally differ by gender. As a collective entity, expressed beliefs were complex, focusing on one or more emotion component—e.g., appraisal, regulation, expression—as well as on emotion intensity, duration, and on self-concept issues. Overall, expressed beliefs seemed to imply a malleability theory of emotions, and emotion awareness. Results overall confirmed the hypotheses that conflict and uncertainty attributions are more likely for: unpleasant experiences; when emotions are norm-incongruent for the judged event; when mixed, ambivalent emotions are felt. The study confirms that people interpret emotion processes according to their lay theories." @default.
- W4381570628 created "2023-06-22" @default.
- W4381570628 creator A5082892812 @default.
- W4381570628 date "2023-05-31" @default.
- W4381570628 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
- W4381570628 title "Naïve theories of emotions: Why people might (not) be uncertain or in conflict about felt emotions" @default.
- W4381570628 cites W1001190877 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W1965026002 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W1969184080 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2004239426 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2041617921 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2051422757 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2097780989 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2106240548 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2113022628 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2114785251 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2119994416 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2149652971 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2151531845 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2158679443 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2163369661 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2323260971 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2418369210 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2739411820 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2769114842 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2905547142 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W2969274032 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W4236827811 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W4240564218 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W4250552389 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W4362211020 @default.
- W4381570628 cites W810968520 @default.
- W4381570628 doi "https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.5529" @default.
- W4381570628 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37731896" @default.
- W4381570628 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4381570628 type Work @default.
- W4381570628 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4381570628 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4381570628 hasAuthorship W4381570628A5082892812 @default.
- W4381570628 hasBestOaLocation W43815706281 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C143299363 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C162127614 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C206310091 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C2776033948 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C2779302386 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C2779728303 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C2779812673 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C2781283010 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C143299363 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C15744967 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C162127614 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C17744445 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C199539241 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C206310091 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C2776033948 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C2779302386 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C2779728303 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C2779812673 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C2781283010 @default.
- W4381570628 hasConceptScore W4381570628C77805123 @default.
- W4381570628 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W4381570628 hasLocation W43815706281 @default.
- W4381570628 hasLocation W43815706282 @default.
- W4381570628 hasOpenAccess W4381570628 @default.
- W4381570628 hasPrimaryLocation W43815706281 @default.
- W4381570628 hasRelatedWork W1991155834 @default.
- W4381570628 hasRelatedWork W1992822336 @default.
- W4381570628 hasRelatedWork W2055108497 @default.
- W4381570628 hasRelatedWork W2074611307 @default.
- W4381570628 hasRelatedWork W2131788636 @default.
- W4381570628 hasRelatedWork W2979419002 @default.
- W4381570628 hasRelatedWork W3048606851 @default.
- W4381570628 hasRelatedWork W4236194524 @default.
- W4381570628 hasRelatedWork W2045693211 @default.
- W4381570628 hasRelatedWork W2086187330 @default.
- W4381570628 hasVolume "19" @default.
- W4381570628 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4381570628 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4381570628 workType "article" @default.