FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4382044981> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4382044981 abstract "Pragmatic trials, because they study widely used treatments in settings of routine practice, require intensive participation from clinicians who determine whether patients can be enrolled. Clinicians are often conflicted between their therapeutic obligation to patients and their willingness to enroll them in trials in which treatments are randomly determined and thus potentially suboptimal. Refusal to enroll eligible patients can hinder trial completion and damage generalizability. In order to help evaluate and mitigate clinician refusal, this qualitative study examined how clinicians reason about whether to randomize eligible patients.We performed interviews with 29 anesthesiologists who participated in REGAIN, a multicenter pragmatic randomized trial comparing spinal and general anesthesia in hip fracture. Interviews included a chart-stimulated section in which physicians described their reasoning pertaining to specific eligible patients as well as a general semi-structured section about their views on clinical research. Guided by a constructivist grounded theory approach, we analyzed data via coding, synthesized thematic patterns using focused coding, and developed an explanation using abduction.Anesthesiologists perceived their main clinical function as preventing peri- and intraoperative complications. In some cases, they used prototype-based reasoning to determine whether patients with contraindications should be randomized; in others, they used probabilistic reasoning. These modes of reasoning involved different types of uncertainty. In contrast, anesthesiologists expressed confidence about anesthetic options when they accepted patients for randomization. Anesthesiologists saw themselves as having a fiduciary responsibility to patients and thus did not hesitate to communicate their inclinations, even when this complicated trial recruitment. Nevertheless, they voiced strong support for clinical research, stating that their involvement was mainly hindered by production pressure and workflow disruptions.Our findings suggest that prominent ways of assessing clinician decisions about trial randomization are based on questionable assumptions about clinical reasoning. Close examination of routine clinical practice, attuned to the features of clinical reasoning we reveal here, will help both in evaluating clinicians' enrollment determinations in specific trials and in anticipating and responding to them.Regional Versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence After Hip Fracture (REGAIN).gov NCT02507505. Prospectively registered on July 24, 2015." @default.
• W4382044981 created "2023-06-27" @default.
• W4382044981 creator A5029595853 @default.
• W4382044981 creator A5031512057 @default.
• W4382044981 creator A5077086245 @default.
• W4382044981 creator A5084243565 @default.
• W4382044981 date "2023-06-27" @default.
• W4382044981 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4382044981 title "Clinical reasoning in pragmatic trial randomization: a qualitative interview study" @default.
• W4382044981 cites W1481422321 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W1601403645 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W1965926642 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W1971781097 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W1976450230 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W1984044747 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W1984077526 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W1985802923 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2006853845 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2023137785 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2042738347 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2045313361 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2057160015 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2069063112 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2072632162 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2091733443 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2097041538 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2101242160 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2102521213 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2106604167 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2107463225 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2110380947 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2120185140 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2121671594 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2123009097 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2123572561 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2146985461 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2150592795 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2238678474 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2414442728 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2490038287 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2515054955 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2539317882 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2583411156 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2620883902 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2749959514 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2754542146 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2761784626 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2785387202 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2800544499 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2809508627 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2897175288 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W2994556166 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W3005812437 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W3080287355 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W3082867365 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W4226506649 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W4235592050 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W4238061619 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W4249085374 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W4310422017 @default.
• W4382044981 cites W437024349 @default.
• W4382044981 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07445-3" @default.
• W4382044981 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37365614" @default.
• W4382044981 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4382044981 type Work @default.
• W4382044981 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4382044981 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4382044981 hasAuthorship W4382044981A5029595853 @default.
• W4382044981 hasAuthorship W4382044981A5031512057 @default.
• W4382044981 hasAuthorship W4382044981A5077086245 @default.
• W4382044981 hasAuthorship W4382044981A5084243565 @default.
• W4382044981 hasBestOaLocation W43820449811 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C156325361 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C179518139 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C204243189 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C27158222 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C68122502 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConceptScore W4382044981C105795698 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConceptScore W4382044981C126322002 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConceptScore W4382044981C138496976 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConceptScore W4382044981C141071460 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConceptScore W4382044981C142724271 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConceptScore W4382044981C144024400 @default.
• W4382044981 hasConceptScore W4382044981C156325361 @default.

• next