FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4382136229> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4382136229 endingPage "3329" @default.
• W4382136229 startingPage "3329" @default.
• W4382136229 abstract "Given this new context, our objective is to recognize the suitability of the currently available software for image fusion and the reported series using the transperineal route, as well as to generate new evidence on the complementarity of the directed and systematic biopsies, which has been established through the transrectal approach.This systematic review, registered in Prospero (CRD42022375619), began with a bibliographic search that was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria and the studied eligibility based on the Participants, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes (PICO) strategy were followed. Warp analysis of selected studies was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. In addition, a Google search of all currently available fusion platforms was performed. Our Google search found 11 different commercially available robots to perform transperineal image fusion biopsies, of which 10 devices have published articles supporting their diagnostic effectiveness in transperineal prostate biopsies.A total of 30 articles were selected and the characteristics and results of the biopsies of 11,313 patients were analyzed. The pooled mean age was 66.5 years (63-69). The mean pooled PSA level was 7.8 ng/mL (5.7-10.8). The mean pooled prostate volume was 45.4 cc. (34-56). The mean pooled PSA density was 0.17 (0.12-0.27). The overall cancer detection rate for all prostate cancers was 61.4%, while for csPCa it was 47.8%. PCa detection rate was more effective than that demonstrated in the systematic transrectal biopsy. However, the detection of csPCa in the systematic biopsy was only 9.5% in the reported series. To standardize our review, we grouped prostate cancer screening results according to the population studied and the software used. When the same populations were compared between elastic and rigid software, we found that rigid biopsies had a higher csPCa detection rate than biopsies with elastic fusion systems.Platforms performing prostate biopsy using transperineal image fusion have better detection rates of csPCa than systematic transrectal biopsies. Rigid fusion systems have a better csPCa detection rate than elastic ones. We found no diagnostic differences between the different types of robotic systems currently available. The complementarity of systematic biopsy has also been demonstrated in transperineal imaging fusion biopsies." @default.
• W4382136229 created "2023-06-27" @default.
• W4382136229 creator A5006292510 @default.
• W4382136229 creator A5040921453 @default.
• W4382136229 creator A5049082221 @default.
• W4382136229 creator A5082105547 @default.
• W4382136229 creator A5092271734 @default.
• W4382136229 date "2023-06-24" @default.
• W4382136229 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4382136229 title "A Systematic Review of the Current Status of Magnetic Resonance–Ultrasound Images Fusion Software Platforms for Transperineal Prostate Biopsies" @default.
• W4382136229 cites W1761918965 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W1827911007 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2044986849 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2045862330 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2098226918 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2107638293 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2115726304 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2121103668 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2169205464 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2340422569 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2486993069 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2488029684 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2549680677 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2552620269 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2577453388 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2591126194 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2607320130 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2731796198 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2739848496 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2760699575 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2764317271 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2771625989 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2775782740 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2793905111 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2900548778 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2901782102 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2901859788 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2917067212 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2925827767 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2941679071 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2952030907 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2956705941 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2991040427 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W2998662361 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3040862476 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3046740159 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3087011382 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3097158220 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3110037340 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3128646645 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3170068568 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3173845577 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3177203918 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3191489957 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3197744920 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3198640404 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W3204029167 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4200278074 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4206841660 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4211214340 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4214707755 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4225825892 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4287218666 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4289710919 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4292687895 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4295077797 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4306736917 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4309365630 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4313456066 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4315435827 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4317211964 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4319655670 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W4320494189 @default.
• W4382136229 cites W49437421 @default.
• W4382136229 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133329" @default.
• W4382136229 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37444439" @default.
• W4382136229 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4382136229 type Work @default.
• W4382136229 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4382136229 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4382136229 hasAuthorship W4382136229A5006292510 @default.
• W4382136229 hasAuthorship W4382136229A5040921453 @default.
• W4382136229 hasAuthorship W4382136229A5049082221 @default.
• W4382136229 hasAuthorship W4382136229A5082105547 @default.
• W4382136229 hasAuthorship W4382136229A5092271734 @default.
• W4382136229 hasBestOaLocation W43821362291 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4382136229 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.

• next