Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4382136952> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W4382136952 endingPage "68" @default.
- W4382136952 startingPage "68" @default.
- W4382136952 abstract "Background: This study compared the diagnostic efficacy of VistaCam iX infrared camera, visual inspection, and bitewing-radiographs for the detection of primary occlusal caries of permanent teeth.Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, 80 extracted human premolars were evaluated. The occlusal surfaces of these teeth were demineralized by immersion in a demineralizing agent. Then, the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II), bitewing-radiography, and Proxi head of VistaCam iX were used to inspect them. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each diagnostic modality. Data were analyzed using SPSS. Twenty-five at P < 0.05 level of significance with one-way analysis of variance and Games–Howell test.Results: Bitewing-radiography had significantly lower sensitivity than ICDAS II and VistaCam (P < 0.05). ICDAS II was comparable to VistaCam, with no significant difference in sensitivity (P > 0.05). ICDAS II had a significantly higher PPV than bitewing-radiography and VistaCam (P < 0.05). The sensitivity of bitewing radiography was significantly lower than that of ICDAS II and VistaCam (P < 0.05). ICDAS II was comparable to that of VistaCam with no significant differences in sensitivity (P > 0.05). ICDAS II had a considerably higher PPV than bitewing-radiography and VistaCam (P < 0.05). The NPV of ICDAS II visual inspection was significantly higher than that of bitewing-radiography and VistaCam (P < 0.05). The ICDASS II and VistaCam had a repeatability coefficient of 47.4%. For bitewing-radiography and VistaCam, this value was 44.2% and 83.4% for ICDAS II and bitewing-radiography.Conclusion: Visual inspection seems to be superior to bitewing-radiography and VistaCam in detecting primary occlusal caries of permanent teeth." @default.
- W4382136952 created "2023-06-27" @default.
- W4382136952 creator A5019421037 @default.
- W4382136952 creator A5063813532 @default.
- W4382136952 creator A5076606879 @default.
- W4382136952 creator A5077148485 @default.
- W4382136952 creator A5092271935 @default.
- W4382136952 creator A5092271936 @default.
- W4382136952 date "2023-01-01" @default.
- W4382136952 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W4382136952 title "Comparison of diagnostic effects of infrared imaging, visual inspection, and bitewing radiography in primary occlusal caries of permanent teeth" @default.
- W4382136952 cites W1966675276 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W1971580841 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W1978937481 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W1981450048 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W1982328127 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W1984482757 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2015977345 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2034287361 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2062863895 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2064226211 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2078136150 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2087220712 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2105303584 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2128019757 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2138690105 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2164562125 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2183645874 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2460318054 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2595929515 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2732207850 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2779839309 @default.
- W4382136952 cites W2896043190 @default.
- W4382136952 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.379625" @default.
- W4382136952 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37483901" @default.
- W4382136952 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4382136952 type Work @default.
- W4382136952 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4382136952 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4382136952 hasAuthorship W4382136952A5019421037 @default.
- W4382136952 hasAuthorship W4382136952A5063813532 @default.
- W4382136952 hasAuthorship W4382136952A5076606879 @default.
- W4382136952 hasAuthorship W4382136952A5077148485 @default.
- W4382136952 hasAuthorship W4382136952A5092271935 @default.
- W4382136952 hasAuthorship W4382136952A5092271936 @default.
- W4382136952 hasBestOaLocation W43821369521 @default.
- W4382136952 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W4382136952 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W4382136952 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W4382136952 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
- W4382136952 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4382136952 hasConceptScore W4382136952C126838900 @default.
- W4382136952 hasConceptScore W4382136952C199343813 @default.
- W4382136952 hasConceptScore W4382136952C29694066 @default.
- W4382136952 hasConceptScore W4382136952C36454342 @default.
- W4382136952 hasConceptScore W4382136952C71924100 @default.
- W4382136952 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W4382136952 hasLocation W43821369521 @default.
- W4382136952 hasLocation W43821369522 @default.
- W4382136952 hasOpenAccess W4382136952 @default.
- W4382136952 hasPrimaryLocation W43821369521 @default.
- W4382136952 hasRelatedWork W1568701304 @default.
- W4382136952 hasRelatedWork W1578936140 @default.
- W4382136952 hasRelatedWork W1988052614 @default.
- W4382136952 hasRelatedWork W2061731130 @default.
- W4382136952 hasRelatedWork W2411545073 @default.
- W4382136952 hasRelatedWork W2415747005 @default.
- W4382136952 hasRelatedWork W2423280797 @default.
- W4382136952 hasRelatedWork W4230773746 @default.
- W4382136952 hasRelatedWork W4250549352 @default.
- W4382136952 hasRelatedWork W4322722608 @default.
- W4382136952 hasVolume "20" @default.
- W4382136952 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4382136952 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4382136952 workType "article" @default.