FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4382318763> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4382318763 endingPage "312" @default.
• W4382318763 startingPage "310" @default.
• W4382318763 abstract "https://www.videogie.org/cms/asset/8ea43e56-86bf-433a-b22b-c0ebcfd97c7a/mmc1.mp4Loading ...(mp4, 73.96 MB) Download video Case showing a complete intraperitoneal maldeployment of a lumen-apposing metal stent during EUS-guided gastro-entero-anastomosis for malignant gastric outlet obstruction, which was rescued through a retrieval with peritoneoscopy through natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. A 75-year-old female patient developed nausea and vomiting because of gastric outlet obstruction consequent to a duodenal malignancy infiltrating the antrum-duodenal wall and causing stomach enlargement (Fig. 1A). Moreover, she was considered unfit for surgery because of her performance status and severe cardiomyopathy. The gastroscopy showed duodenal neoplastic tissue occluding the pylorus (tissue was acquired with histological confirmation) (Fig. 1B). After a multidisciplinary board discussion, including an evaluation of internal protocols, we discussed the possibility of performing an alternative and off-label endoscopic procedure, an EUS-guided gastroenteroanastomosis (EUS-GEA), rather than duodenal stenting, with the patient and her family. After the meeting, the patient was aware of technical aspects, risks, benefits, and outcomes of both endoscopic procedures (duodenal stenting and EUS-GEA),1Itoi T. Ishii K. Ikeuchi N. et al.Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided double-balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass (EPASS) for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.Gut. 2016; 65: 193-195Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar, 2Tyberg A. Kumta N. Karia K. Zerbo S. Sharaiha R.Z. Kahaleh M. EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy after failed enteral stenting.Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81: 1011-1012Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 3Ge P.S. Young J.Y. Dong W. Thompson C.C. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stent placement for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction.Surg Endosc. 2019; 33: 3404-3411Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar, 4Chan S.M. Dhir V. Chan Y.Y.Y. et al.Endoscopic ultrasound-guided balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass, duodenal stent or laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction.Dig Endosc. 2023; 35: 512-519Crossref Scopus (1) Google Scholar and she decided to undergo EUS-GEA. Therefore, we scheduled an EUS-GEA to resolve the gastric obstruction. EUS-GEA was performed using the single-balloon and freehand technique with deployment of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). Prophylactic antibiotics with piperacillin/tazobactam were administered, and carbon dioxide (CO2) was used during the procedure because it is safer and more easily absorbable than air. The endoscopic balloon was placed beyond the occluded side of duodenum, and the endoscopist identified the desired intestinal loop with the instillation of contrast, saline, and methylene blue. The LAMS was going to be placed from the stomach into the identified loop through the Hot AXIOS delivery system (20 × 10 mm; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass, USA), but a double adverse event suddenly occurred. First, the first flange of the LAMS was deployed out of the jejunum, and after that the second flange was deployed into the peritoneal cavity. In that moment, we immediately had to decide whether to refer the patient to surgery or keep performing the procedure with endoscopic retrieval of the LAMS. Considering the use of CO2 and the patient’s condition, we decided to achieve the EUS-GEA with a second but successful attempt. The second LAMS (20 × 10 mm, Hot AXIOS; Boston Scientific) was releasing with the same technique, but this time we focused on having a more comfortable and stable position during the fistula creation. We successively moved to manage the retrieval of the intra-abdominal LAMS using the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) technique.5ASGE; SAGES. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper October 2005.Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63: 199-203Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar Therefore, we first identified the iatrogenic hole in the gastric wall with insertion of a guidewire through it, and then a dilation of the gastric wall defect to 18 mm of diameter was performed (Fig. 2), permitting us to cross it and perform a transgastric peritoneoscopy with the retrieval of the LAMS across the gastric defect by grasping it using a foreign body forceps (Fig. 3; Video 1, available online at www.videogie.org). The iatrogenic gastric defect was then closed with 3 metallic clips, and no extraluminal diffusion of contrast was seen at the fluoroscopic view. After 12 hours, the patient’s clinical status and laboratory tests were favorable, and her CT scan with oral contrast showed regular flow through the GEA with no extraluminal diffusion (Fig. 4) and an asymptomatic low amount of CO2, which was reabsorbed in 24 hours. Moreover, we closely talked to our infectious disease consultant, so we administered antibiotic therapy with quinolone (ciprofloxacin) and metronidazole for 5 days. The patient started a liquid diet after 24 hours and was discharged after another 48 hours of observation with a soft-solid diet. At our last follow-up call (4 months after the procedure), she was undergoing systemic chemotherapy and feeding with a soft-solid diet. Moreover, she did not complain about any late adverse event related to EUS-GEA. Currently, few reports discuss the use of NOTES as rescue therapy after LAMS maldeployment,6Sanchez-Ocana R. Penas-Herrero I. Gil-Simon P. de la Serna-Higuera C. Perez-Miranda M. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery salvage of direct EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy.VideoGIE. 2017; 2: 346-348Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar and to our knowledge, no reports discuss the application of NOTES for accessing the peritoneal space and retrieving a maldeployed LAMS.Figure 2Radiologic view of balloon dilation of the gastric wall defect to achieve peritoneal access.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Figure 3A, Endoscopic view of the intraperitoneal LAMS rescue. The white arrow indicates the LAMS, and the red arrow indicates the peritoneal tissue. B, Radiologic view after EUS-guided gastroenteroanastomosis and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery showing normal placement of the LAMS and the 3 metallic clips applied to close the gastric defect. LAMS, Lumen-apposing metal stent.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Figure 4CT scan with oral contrast showing regular flow into the jejunal loop through the lumen-apposing metal stent (red arrow).View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) The authors did not disclose any financial relationships. This work was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health, Ricerca Corrente 2023." @default.
• W4382318763 created "2023-06-28" @default.
• W4382318763 creator A5021453538 @default.
• W4382318763 creator A5047312459 @default.
• W4382318763 creator A5055913589 @default.
• W4382318763 creator A5062891513 @default.
• W4382318763 creator A5068341379 @default.
• W4382318763 creator A5087838049 @default.
• W4382318763 date "2023-08-01" @default.
• W4382318763 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4382318763 title "Complete intraperitoneal maldeployment of a lumen-apposing metal stent during EUS-guided gastroenteroanastomosis for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: rescue retrieval with peritoneoscopy through natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery" @default.
• W4382318763 cites W1929825237 @default.
• W4382318763 cites W2113120520 @default.
• W4382318763 cites W2749497003 @default.
• W4382318763 cites W2761011857 @default.
• W4382318763 cites W2914214303 @default.
• W4382318763 cites W4308957949 @default.
• W4382318763 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vgie.2023.05.007" @default.
• W4382318763 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37575144" @default.
• W4382318763 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4382318763 type Work @default.
• W4382318763 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4382318763 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4382318763 hasAuthorship W4382318763A5021453538 @default.
• W4382318763 hasAuthorship W4382318763A5047312459 @default.
• W4382318763 hasAuthorship W4382318763A5055913589 @default.
• W4382318763 hasAuthorship W4382318763A5062891513 @default.
• W4382318763 hasAuthorship W4382318763A5068341379 @default.
• W4382318763 hasAuthorship W4382318763A5087838049 @default.
• W4382318763 hasBestOaLocation W43823187631 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConcept C131631996 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConcept C2779399171 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConcept C2780475097 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConcept C2780706714 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConceptScore W4382318763C126322002 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConceptScore W4382318763C126838900 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConceptScore W4382318763C131631996 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConceptScore W4382318763C141071460 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConceptScore W4382318763C2778583881 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConceptScore W4382318763C2779399171 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConceptScore W4382318763C2780475097 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConceptScore W4382318763C2780706714 @default.
• W4382318763 hasConceptScore W4382318763C71924100 @default.
• W4382318763 hasFunder F4320321781 @default.
• W4382318763 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W4382318763 hasLocation W43823187631 @default.
• W4382318763 hasLocation W43823187632 @default.
• W4382318763 hasOpenAccess W4382318763 @default.
• W4382318763 hasPrimaryLocation W43823187631 @default.
• W4382318763 hasRelatedWork W1998349964 @default.
• W4382318763 hasRelatedWork W2314036475 @default.
• W4382318763 hasRelatedWork W2396284429 @default.
• W4382318763 hasRelatedWork W2404922138 @default.
• W4382318763 hasRelatedWork W2585852381 @default.
• W4382318763 hasRelatedWork W2979007236 @default.
• W4382318763 hasRelatedWork W4229008004 @default.
• W4382318763 hasRelatedWork W4230700471 @default.
• W4382318763 hasRelatedWork W4381926363 @default.
• W4382318763 hasRelatedWork W2316891141 @default.
• W4382318763 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W4382318763 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4382318763 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4382318763 workType "article" @default.