FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4383873252> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4383873252 endingPage "9" @default.
• W4383873252 startingPage "1" @default.
• W4383873252 abstract "Issue: The way educators think about the nature of competence, the approaches one selects for the assessment of competence, what generated data implies, and what counts as good assessment now involve broader and more diverse interpretive processes. Broadening philosophical positions in assessment has educators applying different interpretations to similar assessment concepts. As a result, what is claimed through assessment, including what counts as quality, can be different for each of us despite using similar activities and language. This is leading to some uncertainty on how to proceed or worse, provides opportunities for questioning the legitimacy of any assessment activity or outcome. While some debate in assessment is inevitable, most have been within philosophical positions (e.g., how best to minimize error), whereas newer debates are happening across philosophical positions (e.g., whether error is a useful concept). As new ways of approaching assessment have emerged, the interpretive nature of underlying philosophical positions has not been sufficiently attended to. Evidence: We illustrate interpretive processes of assessment in action by: (a) summarizing the current health professions assessment context from a philosophical perspective as a way of describing its evolution; (b) demonstrating implications in practice using two examples (i.e., analysis of assessment work and validity claims); and (c) examining pragmatism to demonstrate how even within specific philosophical positions opportunities for variable interpretations still exist. Implications: Our concern is not that assessment designers and users have different assumptions, but that practically, educators may unknowingly (or insidiously) apply different assumptions, and methodological and interpretive norms, and subsequently settle on different views on what serves as quality assessment even for the same assessment program or event. With the state of assessment in health professions in flux, we conclude by calling for a philosophically explicit approach to assessment, and underscore assessment as, fundamentally, an interpretive process - one which demands the careful elucidation of philosophical assumptions to promote understanding and ultimately defensibility of assessment processes and outcomes." @default.
• W4383873252 created "2023-07-12" @default.
• W4383873252 creator A5028908557 @default.
• W4383873252 creator A5032335247 @default.
• W4383873252 date "2023-07-11" @default.
• W4383873252 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4383873252 title "Attending to Variable Interpretations of Assessment Science and Practice" @default.
• W4383873252 cites W1992387380 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2013821356 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2061651815 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2068472948 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2088893554 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2093083435 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2095723554 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2096946250 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2128363176 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2141063421 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2145187709 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2163175447 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2171032518 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2173053215 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2186524655 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2274029326 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2338856372 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2343084109 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2524651509 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2739562701 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2740050092 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2790686191 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2896211838 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2896892568 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2897253278 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2900186484 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2943067591 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2982844391 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2983904256 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2986518379 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2997241714 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W2998363599 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W3015300512 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W3039527713 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W3049771573 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W3080349182 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W3097163440 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W3155135002 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W3188171252 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W4238857402 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W4254924799 @default.
• W4383873252 cites W4285146380 @default.
• W4383873252 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2023.2231923" @default.
• W4383873252 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37431929" @default.
• W4383873252 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4383873252 type Work @default.
• W4383873252 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4383873252 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4383873252 hasAuthorship W4383873252A5028908557 @default.
• W4383873252 hasAuthorship W4383873252A5032335247 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C158573231 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C46295352 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C100521375 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C111472728 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C12713177 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C127413603 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C138885662 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C144024400 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C154945302 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C15744967 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C158573231 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C17744445 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C199539241 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C41008148 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C46295352 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C55587333 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C77805123 @default.
• W4383873252 hasConceptScore W4383873252C94625758 @default.
• W4383873252 hasLocation W43838732521 @default.
• W4383873252 hasLocation W43838732522 @default.
• W4383873252 hasOpenAccess W4383873252 @default.
• W4383873252 hasPrimaryLocation W43838732521 @default.
• W4383873252 hasRelatedWork W1776924010 @default.
• W4383873252 hasRelatedWork W2127162747 @default.
• W4383873252 hasRelatedWork W2160902639 @default.
• W4383873252 hasRelatedWork W2166732252 @default.
• W4383873252 hasRelatedWork W2334405670 @default.

• next