FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4384156931> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4384156931 abstract "The aim of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility, operative techniques, safety, and efficacy outcomes of procedures aimed at correcting deep venous reflux, in patients with chronic venous insufficiency.We performed systematic literature searches in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from databases' inception to February 2022. We included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies describing surgical procedures to treat patients with deep reflux due to primary and secondary incompetence, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Proportion meta-analyses were performed for all the efficacy and safety outcomes.We included 57 studies in the quantitative synthesis: three randomized controlled trials including 252 patients and 54 case series including 4004 patients. Studies included a median of 38 patients, with a mean age of 51 years; 52% of them were males. Forty percent of studies included 2291 patients with primary incompetence, 29% of studies included 595 patients with PTS, and 31% of studies included 1118 patients with both diseases. As for primary incompetence, pooled estimates for all procedures showed an 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-94%) of ulcer healing, 10% (95% CI, 4%-18%) ulcer recurrence, 98% (95% CI, 93%-100%) valve patency, 84% (95% CI, 78%-90%) valve competence, 0.05% (1/1904 patients) pulmonary embolism, 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) wound infections, 5% (95% CI, 1%-9%) hematoma, 2% (95% CI, 0%-6%) lymphocele, 2% (95% CI, 1%-4%) thrombosis, 85% (95% CI, 74%-94%) pain improvement, 89% (95% CI, 65%-100%) edema improvement, and 85% (95% CI, 73%-93%) lipodermatosclerosis improvement. Patients with PTS showed less favorable outcomes: 82% (95% CI, 71%-91%) of ulcer healing, 18% (95% CI, 5%-36%) ulcer recurrence, 88% (95% CI, 78%-96%) valve patency, 78% (95% CI, 66%-88%) valve competence, no pulmonary embolism, 6% (95% CI, 0%-22%) wound infections, 6% (95% CI, 3%-10%) hematoma, 5% (95% CI, 1%-12%) lymphocele, 7% (95% CI, 1%-16%) thrombosis, 79% (95% CI, 59%-94%) pain improvement, 75% (95% CI, 61%-88%) edema improvement, and 64% (95% CI, 9%-100%) lipodermatosclerosis improvement.The number of studies included in each meta-analysis are limited, and knowing how this element can affect the statistical power, as well as the absence of comparative control groups, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions. Nevertheless, deep venous reconstructive surgery for reflux may increase the probability of clinical improvement in patients affected by chronic venous insufficiency. Outcomes appear to be satisfactory even if possible adjunctive procedures may be required over the course of the patient's lifetime. Consequently, a strict follow-up protocol is required to maintain outcomes. Further studies are required to evaluate deep venous reconstructive surgery for reflux particularly as to how it compares with the more recently introduced endovenous approaches." @default.
• W4384156931 created "2023-07-14" @default.
• W4384156931 creator A5016956578 @default.
• W4384156931 creator A5023146003 @default.
• W4384156931 creator A5051719603 @default.
• W4384156931 creator A5075432052 @default.
• W4384156931 date "2023-07-01" @default.
• W4384156931 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W4384156931 title "Systematic review and meta-analysis of deep venous reflux correction in chronic venous insufficiency" @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1967042742 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1968725741 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1971981583 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1975544097 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1979473776 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1983100060 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1983760434 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1989489876 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1992045873 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1993247256 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1993798135 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1994376076 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1999495718 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W1999971705 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2000117684 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2007240679 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2011027831 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2014253444 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2015630839 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2021389463 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2029342173 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2033688305 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2042168920 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2044442478 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2044646192 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2045893983 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2064016792 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2078229375 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2084331405 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2085798618 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2087257201 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2087279669 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2105650740 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2105917987 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2108216900 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2108559404 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2111621694 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2112966242 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2119506579 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2123257488 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2134833483 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2135508613 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2142013347 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2143386240 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2145253654 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2156098321 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2164396839 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2344548885 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2486025160 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2555108234 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W2991792334 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W3039423296 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W3044962132 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W4200104444 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W4297811807 @default.
• W4384156931 cites W4319308472 @default.
• W4384156931 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.07.003" @default.
• W4384156931 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37453548" @default.
• W4384156931 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4384156931 type Work @default.
• W4384156931 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4384156931 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4384156931 hasAuthorship W4384156931A5016956578 @default.
• W4384156931 hasAuthorship W4384156931A5023146003 @default.
• W4384156931 hasAuthorship W4384156931A5051719603 @default.
• W4384156931 hasAuthorship W4384156931A5075432052 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C2776106345 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C2776265017 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C2778555097 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C2778959117 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C2780011451 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C2780868729 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C43270747 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConceptScore W4384156931C126322002 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConceptScore W4384156931C141071460 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConceptScore W4384156931C168563851 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConceptScore W4384156931C2776106345 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConceptScore W4384156931C2776265017 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConceptScore W4384156931C2778555097 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConceptScore W4384156931C2778959117 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConceptScore W4384156931C2779134260 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConceptScore W4384156931C2780011451 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConceptScore W4384156931C2780868729 @default.
• W4384156931 hasConceptScore W4384156931C43270747 @default.

• next