Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4384201181> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 56 of
56
with 100 items per page.
- W4384201181 endingPage "280" @default.
- W4384201181 startingPage "256" @default.
- W4384201181 abstract "The article is devoted to the study of institutional and procedural problems related to the resolution of conflicts arising in professional and Olympic sports (elite sports). Modern sport seeks to isolate itself from state and international legal regulation, to create its own system of corporate standards, the subjects of which are sports organizations and athletes. In order to impart stability to the introduced system of corporate rules, international non-governmental organizations leading the world sports and Olympic movement also create their own jurisdictional bodies (arbitration courts, the so-called sports tribunals), the purpose of which is to resolve disputes between athletes, sports organizations on corporate rules established by international sports federations and the International Olympic Committee. The central part of this system of sports arbitration courts is the Sports Arbitration Court in Lausanne (Switzerland), whose status is analyzed in detail in this paper.One of the main problems to which the author pays attention, is the non-consensual, in fact forced nature of the spread of the jurisdiction of the sports arbitration courts on athletes, often combined with a prohibition (established in the corporate act — for example, the regulations of sports federations) to appeal to the state courts under a threat of lifelong disqualification. Thus, the structures that govern the world professional and Olympic sports require athletes to refuse to exercise their constitutional right to access to justice. But could an arbitration clause be considered valid if the athlete did not give consent to the consideration of his disputes in the arbitration court (arbitration) and to the choice of arbitration jurisdiction, which in fact was forced? Unfortunately, practice shows that in most cases, when athletes ignore this ban and apply to national courts, appealing against the decisions of the sports arbitration court in Lausanne, the latter make “political” decisions that take the interests of the leading forces in the world sports movement into account." @default.
- W4384201181 created "2023-07-14" @default.
- W4384201181 creator A5001851945 @default.
- W4384201181 date "2023-07-11" @default.
- W4384201181 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W4384201181 title "The Issue of Voluntariness of Consent to Refer Disputes to the Court of Arbitration for Sport based on the Analysis of Its Status and Principles of Functioning" @default.
- W4384201181 cites W1583603457 @default.
- W4384201181 cites W2466832798 @default.
- W4384201181 cites W2999118922 @default.
- W4384201181 cites W3039231806 @default.
- W4384201181 cites W51746208 @default.
- W4384201181 doi "https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2023.2.24.256-280" @default.
- W4384201181 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4384201181 type Work @default.
- W4384201181 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4384201181 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4384201181 hasAuthorship W4384201181A5001851945 @default.
- W4384201181 hasBestOaLocation W43842011811 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConcept C160151201 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConceptScore W4384201181C11413529 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConceptScore W4384201181C139621336 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConceptScore W4384201181C160151201 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConceptScore W4384201181C17744445 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConceptScore W4384201181C199539241 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConceptScore W4384201181C2776949292 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConceptScore W4384201181C2778449503 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConceptScore W4384201181C41008148 @default.
- W4384201181 hasConceptScore W4384201181C48103436 @default.
- W4384201181 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W4384201181 hasLocation W43842011811 @default.
- W4384201181 hasOpenAccess W4384201181 @default.
- W4384201181 hasPrimaryLocation W43842011811 @default.
- W4384201181 hasRelatedWork W1990135703 @default.
- W4384201181 hasRelatedWork W2043391115 @default.
- W4384201181 hasRelatedWork W2049702041 @default.
- W4384201181 hasRelatedWork W2122952544 @default.
- W4384201181 hasRelatedWork W2333916420 @default.
- W4384201181 hasRelatedWork W3081592937 @default.
- W4384201181 hasRelatedWork W3161047216 @default.
- W4384201181 hasRelatedWork W4299595354 @default.
- W4384201181 hasRelatedWork W2168299172 @default.
- W4384201181 hasRelatedWork W3112537306 @default.
- W4384201181 hasVolume "10" @default.
- W4384201181 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4384201181 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4384201181 workType "article" @default.