FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4384302138> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4384302138 endingPage "124" @default.
• W4384302138 startingPage "115" @default.
• W4384302138 abstract "Testing of electronic products of railway automation involves assessing the indicators of their functional safety and reliability. Reliability standards are very high. Confirmation of these indicators is mostly performed by the calculation method [8]. For this purpose, the branching technique is applied. The initial data for the calculations are the reference failure rates of the elements of the product under study. In the industry methodology, it is recommended to obtain these failure rates from the time directory, or other available sources. Directories of the late twentieth century are not relevant today. Among the current reference books is MIL-HDBK-217 F. Military handbook. Reliability prediction of electronic equipment. 1991, published in the United States. This guide is used by the vast majority of domestic developers of railway automation products. However, there are certain methodological problems that hinder the use of the methods of the above document. In particular, the methods of the late twentieth century provide reference values of failure rates, which characterize the maximum load on the element. The actual calculated values of failure rates will be significantly lower than the maximum. The reference values of the failure rates, which are given in the American directory, reflect the minimum possible values. In this case, the actual calculated values of failure rates will be significantly higher than the reference. It is obvious that the joint use of the railway industry methodology and the American reference data on failure rates is not correct. In addition, the American method operates with more parameters. A way out of this situation is proposed. If the researcher uses the American value, he is obliged to use as much additional data as possible. Not all such data can be correctly used in the calculations of domestic developers and researchers. Therefore, a comparative analysis of the calculation formulas from the two above sources. Identical parameters and certain differences are indicated. Conclusions are made on the adaptation of the ratio of the American source to domestic requirements." @default.
• W4384302138 created "2023-07-15" @default.
• W4384302138 creator A5012731121 @default.
• W4384302138 creator A5025683768 @default.
• W4384302138 creator A5092470188 @default.
• W4384302138 date "2023-06-21" @default.
• W4384302138 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4384302138 title "ANALYSIS OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING THE RELIABILITY OF RAILWAY AUTOMATION SYSTEMS WITH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS" @default.
• W4384302138 doi "https://doi.org/10.18664/1994-7852.204.2023.284147" @default.
• W4384302138 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4384302138 type Work @default.
• W4384302138 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4384302138 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4384302138 hasAuthorship W4384302138A5012731121 @default.
• W4384302138 hasAuthorship W4384302138A5025683768 @default.
• W4384302138 hasAuthorship W4384302138A5092470188 @default.
• W4384302138 hasBestOaLocation W43843021381 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C115901376 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C163164238 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C2777683733 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C111919701 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C115901376 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C121332964 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C127413603 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C163164238 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C163258240 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C200601418 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C2777683733 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C41008148 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C42475967 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C43214815 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C62520636 @default.
• W4384302138 hasConceptScore W4384302138C78519656 @default.
• W4384302138 hasIssue "204" @default.
• W4384302138 hasLocation W43843021381 @default.
• W4384302138 hasOpenAccess W4384302138 @default.
• W4384302138 hasPrimaryLocation W43843021381 @default.
• W4384302138 hasRelatedWork W2006204510 @default.
• W4384302138 hasRelatedWork W2322139171 @default.
• W4384302138 hasRelatedWork W2337334590 @default.
• W4384302138 hasRelatedWork W2351563818 @default.
• W4384302138 hasRelatedWork W2355543518 @default.
• W4384302138 hasRelatedWork W2373081051 @default.
• W4384302138 hasRelatedWork W2392575536 @default.
• W4384302138 hasRelatedWork W2524718329 @default.
• W4384302138 hasRelatedWork W2808699638 @default.
• W4384302138 hasRelatedWork W3209466718 @default.
• W4384302138 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4384302138 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4384302138 workType "article" @default.