Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4384342849> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W4384342849 endingPage "257" @default.
- W4384342849 startingPage "251" @default.
- W4384342849 abstract "In the article, the author examines some problematic issues of tactical and forensic support of one of the compromise procedures provided for in the current Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine - the plea agreement.
 The most typical abuses of the procedural right by the prosecution during the conclusion of the specified agreement are considered, when using the presence of certain shortcomings in the regulation of the procedure for concluding a plea agreement (initiations, negotiations, the performance of certain actions, or the provision of certain guarantees by the parties to the agreement, etc.), the prosecutor and the investigator from a certain motivations and interests that do not always correspond to the content of the public interest, use situations that are characterized by an increased risk for the abuse of procedural law, as a result of which the rights, freedoms and interests of the parties or other persons may be grossly violated or limited.
 We are considering the situation of concluding such an agreement only in order not to examine all the evidence in court, because the pre-trial investigation made mistakes that cannot be corrected. The artificial creation of prejudice occurs when the prosecutor, contrary to the general rules of prejudice, uses a guilty verdict that approved a plea agreement to limit the rights of a person who is not a party to the criminal proceedings. As well as the prosecution's use of the uncertainty of the victim's status and powers in situations provided for in Part 4 of Article 469 of the Criminal Procedure Code, when the victim consents to the conclusion of a plea agreement in proceedings for the commission of particularly serious crimes, etc.
 It is substantiated that in addition to improving the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code and eliminating certain deficiencies in the regulation of the procedure for concluding a plea agreement, in forensic methods and recommendations for forensic support of pre-trial investigation and maintaining a public prosecution, it is necessary to provide for typical situations of abuse of procedural law by the prosecution, which can be used in the implementation evidence in court during the initiation and conclusion of a plea agreement." @default.
- W4384342849 created "2023-07-15" @default.
- W4384342849 creator A5068672553 @default.
- W4384342849 date "2023-07-13" @default.
- W4384342849 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W4384342849 title "Some problematic issues of ensuring the conclusion of a plea agreement" @default.
- W4384342849 doi "https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.77.2.43" @default.
- W4384342849 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4384342849 type Work @default.
- W4384342849 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4384342849 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4384342849 hasAuthorship W4384342849A5068672553 @default.
- W4384342849 hasBestOaLocation W43843428491 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C107062074 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C2776213154 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C2776818064 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C2777886440 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C46355384 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConcept C504945742 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C10138342 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C107062074 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C138885662 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C144024400 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C144133560 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C15744967 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C17744445 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C182306322 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C190253527 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C199539241 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C199776023 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C2776213154 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C2776818064 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C2777886440 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C41895202 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C46355384 @default.
- W4384342849 hasConceptScore W4384342849C504945742 @default.
- W4384342849 hasIssue "77" @default.
- W4384342849 hasLocation W43843428491 @default.
- W4384342849 hasOpenAccess W4384342849 @default.
- W4384342849 hasPrimaryLocation W43843428491 @default.
- W4384342849 hasRelatedWork W2023373834 @default.
- W4384342849 hasRelatedWork W2132372010 @default.
- W4384342849 hasRelatedWork W2359393706 @default.
- W4384342849 hasRelatedWork W2368512257 @default.
- W4384342849 hasRelatedWork W2565153040 @default.
- W4384342849 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W4384342849 hasRelatedWork W2952945842 @default.
- W4384342849 hasRelatedWork W4296654842 @default.
- W4384342849 hasRelatedWork W802929894 @default.
- W4384342849 hasRelatedWork W1952335412 @default.
- W4384342849 hasVolume "2" @default.
- W4384342849 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4384342849 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4384342849 workType "article" @default.