Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4384343400> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 66 of
66
with 100 items per page.
- W4384343400 endingPage "134" @default.
- W4384343400 startingPage "134" @default.
- W4384343400 abstract "Context. With the development of the software industry, the number of applied methodologies and hybrid approaches based on them constantly increases, that is why, the choice of the most suitable/optimal methodology for the project is an urgent problem of software engineering, since the selection process is poorly formalized, requires sufficient experience of the person who will make this decision and depends on many related factors.
 Objective. The support of decision-making in the process of choosing a methodology for the software project development and increase of the level of adequacy of the above choice.
 Method. Based on the previously developed algorithm by the author, a generalized method for selecting the best software development methodology is proposed, which consists of 14 steps and takes into account the characteristics of the project, based on the multi-criteria analysis approaches, taking into consideration the opinions of experts for a more reasonable choice of the most suitable methodology for this project. The method uses the aggregated expert evaluation. It was decided to use the AHP to calculate the criteria weights. Based on the established values of criteria, their weights and expert evaluation, the score is calculated for each methodology using the weighted sum and TOPSIS methods.
 Results. The application of the developed method to the data of actual projects showed a match in 83% of cases (in five out of six cases, the application of the method resulted in the selection of methodology that corresponded to the one actually used in an existing project). In cases when the methodology chosen by the proposed method differed from the one that was actually used, the application of the proposed method recommends going to the stage of the initial determination of criteria and their weights, which will allow making a more adequate choice of methodology.
 Conclusions. The proposed method can be applied in practice by software project managers to support the decision-making process, and will allow reducing time spent on project management." @default.
- W4384343400 created "2023-07-15" @default.
- W4384343400 creator A5031251696 @default.
- W4384343400 date "2023-07-02" @default.
- W4384343400 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W4384343400 title "METHOD FOR SELECTING A SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY TAKING INTO ACCOUNT PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS" @default.
- W4384343400 doi "https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2023-2-14" @default.
- W4384343400 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4384343400 type Work @default.
- W4384343400 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4384343400 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4384343400 hasAuthorship W4384343400A5031251696 @default.
- W4384343400 hasBestOaLocation W43843434001 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C11105738 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C51566761 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C529173508 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C81917197 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C87345402 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C11105738 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C111919701 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C119857082 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C127413603 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C151730666 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C199360897 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C2777904410 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C2779343474 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C41008148 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C42475967 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C51566761 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C529173508 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C539667460 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C81917197 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C86803240 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C87345402 @default.
- W4384343400 hasConceptScore W4384343400C98045186 @default.
- W4384343400 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W4384343400 hasLocation W43843434001 @default.
- W4384343400 hasOpenAccess W4384343400 @default.
- W4384343400 hasPrimaryLocation W43843434001 @default.
- W4384343400 hasRelatedWork W2135826843 @default.
- W4384343400 hasRelatedWork W2993781329 @default.
- W4384343400 hasRelatedWork W3036835568 @default.
- W4384343400 hasRelatedWork W3129164758 @default.
- W4384343400 hasRelatedWork W3139018143 @default.
- W4384343400 hasRelatedWork W3153848871 @default.
- W4384343400 hasRelatedWork W3163626507 @default.
- W4384343400 hasRelatedWork W3200163294 @default.
- W4384343400 hasRelatedWork W4310385841 @default.
- W4384343400 hasRelatedWork W4311479260 @default.
- W4384343400 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4384343400 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4384343400 workType "article" @default.