FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4384662022> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4384662022 abstract "Purpose The study of sustainability within universities is recognized as essential for debates and research; in the long term, the “sustainable university” concepts can contribute to sustainability from a larger perspective. This study aims to propose a conceptual model for evaluating the students’ sustainability considering their interactions with the university and the environment. The proposed model is titled Sunshine model. It is applied to students of the La Salle University, Peru. Design/methodology/approach The model combines academic performance, happiness and the ecological footprint to quantify university students’ sustainability. A structured questionnaire survey was elaborated and applied to get the raw data that feeds the three methods. The students’ average grades evaluate academic performance. Happiness is quantified by the happiness index method, and the ecological footprint is measured by the demand for food, paper, electricity, transport and built-up areas. Results are evaluated under both approaches, overall group performance and clusters. Findings The proposed model avoids misleading interpretations of a single indicator or discussions on sustainability that lack a conceptual model, bringing robustness in assessing students’ sustainability in universities. To have a low ecological footprint, the student needs to need up to 1 planet for their lifestyle, be considered happy with at least 0.8 (of 1) for happiness index, and have good academic performance with at least a grade of 7 (of 10) in their course. Regarding the case study, La Salle students show a high academic grade degree of 7, a high level for happiness index of 0.8 and low performance for ecological footprint by demanding 1.8 Earth planets, resulting in an “environmentally distracted” overall classification for students with 2019 data. From a cluster approach, 81% of evaluated students ( n = 603) have low performance for ecological footprint, whereas 31% have low performance for indicators of recreational activities of happiness. Changing lifestyles and making more recreational activities available play crucial roles in achieving higher sustainability for the La Salle students. Research limitations/implications The happiness assessment questionnaire can be subject to criticism, as it was created as a specific method for this type of audience based on existing questionnaires in the literature. Although it can be seen as an important approach for diagnoses, the proposed model does not consider the cause–effect aspect. The decision-maker must consider the sociocultural aspects before implementing plan actions. Practical implications University managers can better understand why university students have high or low sustainability performance and provide more effective actions toward higher levels of students’ sustainability. Originality/value The proposed model, Sunshine model, overcomes the single-criteria existing tools that access the sustainability of universities. Rather than focusing on university infrastructure, the proposed model focuses on the students and their relationship with the university." @default.
• W4384662022 created "2023-07-20" @default.
• W4384662022 creator A5015478157 @default.
• W4384662022 creator A5027974494 @default.
• W4384662022 creator A5028694764 @default.
• W4384662022 creator A5040173987 @default.
• W4384662022 creator A5056810667 @default.
• W4384662022 creator A5083090850 @default.
• W4384662022 date "2023-07-19" @default.
• W4384662022 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4384662022 title "A quantitative assessment model for students’ sustainability: evidence from a Peruvian university" @default.
• W4384662022 cites W1665621760 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W1829645172 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W1979562616 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W1982428164 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W1984667039 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W1985128492 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W1986269235 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W1992656413 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W1994944455 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W1997422500 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2000260984 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2002713437 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2008685816 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2016226048 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2017068932 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2023277768 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2032970691 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2041137602 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2046816055 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2050174100 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2061195351 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2067954772 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2082737326 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2085596282 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2090767214 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2095080011 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2099717940 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2102142687 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2114975599 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2119836817 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2121857882 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2122039264 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2124695873 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2132832132 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2139257069 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2146637758 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2151060465 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2157542375 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2164791824 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2168161704 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2263963792 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2342844986 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2398991066 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2426373553 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2548020913 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2581394672 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2587802453 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2764189398 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2767651521 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2769333005 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2793738252 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2888104326 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2898521001 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2900311571 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2902129567 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2913345599 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2939347336 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W2979918474 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W3122840968 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W3124932231 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W3138899058 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W3167744709 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W3184551428 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W3201803763 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W4376059778 @default.
• W4384662022 cites W926115463 @default.
• W4384662022 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-07-2022-0234" @default.
• W4384662022 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4384662022 type Work @default.
• W4384662022 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4384662022 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4384662022 hasAuthorship W4384662022A5015478157 @default.
• W4384662022 hasAuthorship W4384662022A5027974494 @default.
• W4384662022 hasAuthorship W4384662022A5028694764 @default.
• W4384662022 hasAuthorship W4384662022A5040173987 @default.
• W4384662022 hasAuthorship W4384662022A5056810667 @default.
• W4384662022 hasAuthorship W4384662022A5083090850 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C134560507 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C2778999518 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C66204764 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4384662022 hasConcept C83516724 @default.

• next