FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4384663303> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4384663303 endingPage "C128" @default.
• W4384663303 startingPage "C35" @default.
• W4384663303 abstract "This pharmacotherapy curriculum is designed for emergency medicine residents of all postgraduate years and could also be given to rotating medical students during clerkships.Curriculum is to run monthly for an 18-month general curriculum cycle.Pharmacotherapy is a critical part of day-to-day practice of Emergency Medicine (EM). The purpose of this innovation is to give this subject specific dedicated instruction time. We introduced a dedicated pharmacotherapy curriculum as part of our conference time through a series of case-based question sets that mirrored our educational blocks.Our goals were to teach residents clinical applications of EM pharmacotherapy including drug selection and consideration of alternatives, interactions, and adverse effects, as well as to prepare them for pharmacotherapy questions on board examinations.The educational strategies used in this curriculum include: case-based vignettes, multiple choice assessments, and guided review explanation and discussion. Questions and explanations are written by resident physicians using a variety of textbooks and online resources and are then reviewed, edited, and expanded upon by attending physicians and an EM pharmacist.This curriculum was implemented in the University of Pittsburgh Emergency Medicine residency program. Curriculum is ongoing and initial data covers a 4-month pilot period. Survey questionnaires were given before and after, using the 7-point Likert scale (1 strongly agree to 7 strongly disagree) for self-assessed knowledge and satisfaction with the curriculum. Primary measure was resident agreement with the statement, I am confident in overall knowledge of EM pharmacotherapy. We also surveyed readiness for independent practice, knowledge appropriate for training level, board exam preparedness, and satisfaction with curriculum.On the whole residents did feel their pharmacology knowledge improved. Our primary marker was response to a survey question, I am confident in my overall knowledge of EM pharmacotherapy. In our sample of 30 residents, this question received a pretest score of 3.7 on a 7-point Likert scale (1 strongly agree, 7 strongly disagree). On post intervention surveys this score had improved to 2.6 (p = .00008). In general, residents appreciated this change in curriculum structure. Resident assessment of their improvement during the curriculum was 2.1, aligning with agree. Satisfaction also improved from a 3.8 on initial survey to a 3.1, with statistical significance (p =.023).We had success in our primary outcome of self-assessed resident learning as above. Satisfaction also improved. Residents assessed self-improvement in knowledge relative to year of training, clinical practice ability, and independent practice ability by statistically significant amounts. In addition, the assessments provided the residency clinical competency committee with objective knowledge of pharmacotherapy-based topics. We feel this easy to implement and effective curriculum would be generalizable across programs looking to add options for teaching EM pharmacotherapy, or to other programs looking to add a formal instruction and evaluation component to traditionally informal curriculum.Emergency Medicine, education, pharmacotherapy, case based, questions, milestones." @default.
• W4384663303 created "2023-07-20" @default.
• W4384663303 creator A5006803920 @default.
• W4384663303 creator A5019094545 @default.
• W4384663303 creator A5023994009 @default.
• W4384663303 creator A5067585828 @default.
• W4384663303 creator A5068212788 @default.
• W4384663303 date "2021-01-01" @default.
• W4384663303 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W4384663303 title "Case-Based Questions for Teaching Emergency Medicine Pharmacotherapy." @default.
• W4384663303 cites W1990831294 @default.
• W4384663303 cites W2089368089 @default.
• W4384663303 cites W2486208319 @default.
• W4384663303 cites W2790717731 @default.
• W4384663303 cites W2791325278 @default.
• W4384663303 cites W2980993322 @default.
• W4384663303 doi "https://doi.org/10.21980/j8pw61" @default.
• W4384663303 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37465540" @default.
• W4384663303 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4384663303 type Work @default.
• W4384663303 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4384663303 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4384663303 hasAuthorship W4384663303A5006803920 @default.
• W4384663303 hasAuthorship W4384663303A5019094545 @default.
• W4384663303 hasAuthorship W4384663303A5023994009 @default.
• W4384663303 hasAuthorship W4384663303A5067585828 @default.
• W4384663303 hasAuthorship W4384663303A5068212788 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C104863432 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C136197465 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C2779457091 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C500440147 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C104863432 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C105776082 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C136197465 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C138496976 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C154945302 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C15744967 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C159110408 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C19417346 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C2779457091 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C41008148 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C47177190 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C500440147 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C509550671 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C512399662 @default.
• W4384663303 hasConceptScore W4384663303C71924100 @default.
• W4384663303 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4384663303 hasLocation W43846633031 @default.
• W4384663303 hasOpenAccess W4384663303 @default.
• W4384663303 hasPrimaryLocation W43846633031 @default.
• W4384663303 hasRelatedWork W1975061119 @default.
• W4384663303 hasRelatedWork W2101847395 @default.
• W4384663303 hasRelatedWork W2316847454 @default.
• W4384663303 hasRelatedWork W2564246254 @default.
• W4384663303 hasRelatedWork W2605878907 @default.
• W4384663303 hasRelatedWork W2774212748 @default.
• W4384663303 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4384663303 hasRelatedWork W3200791830 @default.
• W4384663303 hasRelatedWork W3210139407 @default.
• W4384663303 hasRelatedWork W4381850233 @default.
• W4384663303 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W4384663303 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4384663303 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4384663303 workType "article" @default.