FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4384665852> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4384665852 endingPage "11144" @default.
• W4384665852 startingPage "11144" @default.
• W4384665852 abstract "In this paper, the Levenberg–Marquardt (LM), Bayesian regularization (BR), resilient backpropagation (RP), gradient descent momentum (GDM), Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS), and scaled conjugate gradient (SCG) algorithms constructed using artificial neural networks (ANN) are applied to the problem of MPPT energy harvesting in solar photovoltaic (PV) systems for the purpose of creating a comparative evaluation of the performance of the six distinct algorithms. The goal of this analysis is to determine which of the six algorithms has the best overall performance. In the study, the performance of managing the training dataset is compared across the algorithms. The maximum power point tracking energy harvesting system is created using the environment of MATLAB or Simulink, and the produced model is examined using the artificial neural network toolkit. A total of 1000 datasets of solar irradiance, temperature, and voltage were used to train the suggested model. The data are split into three categories: training, validation, and testing. Eighty percent of the total data is used for training the model, and the remaining twenty percent is divided equally for testing and validation. According to the results, the regression values of LM, RP, BR, and BFGS are 1, whereas the regression values for SCG and GDM are less than 1. The gradient values for LM, RP, BFGS, SCG, BR, and GDM are 7.983 × 10−6, 0.033415, 1.0211 × 10−7, 0.14161, 0.00010493, and 11.485, respectively. Similarly, the performance values for these algorithms are 2.0816 × 10−10, 2.8668 × 10−6, 9.98 × 10−17, 0.052985, 1.583 × 10−7, and 0.15378. Overall, the results demonstrate that the LM and BFGS algorithms exhibit superior performance in terms of gradient and overall performance. The RP and BR algorithms also perform well across various metrics, while the SCG and GDM algorithms show comparatively less effectiveness in addressing the proposed problem. These findings provide valuable insights into the relative performance of the six evaluated algorithms for MPPT energy harvesting in solar PV systems." @default.
• W4384665852 created "2023-07-20" @default.
• W4384665852 creator A5008679666 @default.
• W4384665852 creator A5028727536 @default.
• W4384665852 creator A5054656755 @default.
• W4384665852 creator A5061292618 @default.
• W4384665852 creator A5073778483 @default.
• W4384665852 creator A5080632612 @default.
• W4384665852 date "2023-07-17" @default.
• W4384665852 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4384665852 title "An Evaluation of ANN Algorithm Performance for MPPT Energy Harvesting in Solar PV Systems" @default.
• W4384665852 cites W1478353461 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W1972099184 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W1989726836 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2001356449 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2003811021 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2028782916 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2029771481 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2049633233 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2051434435 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2051812123 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2091493242 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2095391690 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2095433201 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2108082843 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2169498704 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2185622477 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2214063259 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2248318963 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2259944928 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2280977705 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2283079028 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2324490496 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2530767044 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2593184355 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2786366143 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2788154822 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2789478001 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2798894140 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2800801234 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2803838257 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2806819841 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2888667793 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2893192382 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2900975644 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2903523109 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2913949647 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2967152454 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W2987599316 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3000152658 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3000383383 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3003290025 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3013576419 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3020884982 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3026924043 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3048273690 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3057148185 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3090086577 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3119363261 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3143658028 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3157767613 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3167982873 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W3185833044 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W4280578522 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W4291927186 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W4297905834 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W4312221879 @default.
• W4384665852 cites W844205684 @default.
• W4384665852 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411144" @default.
• W4384665852 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4384665852 type Work @default.
• W4384665852 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4384665852 countsByYear W43846658522023 @default.
• W4384665852 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4384665852 hasAuthorship W4384665852A5008679666 @default.
• W4384665852 hasAuthorship W4384665852A5028727536 @default.
• W4384665852 hasAuthorship W4384665852A5054656755 @default.
• W4384665852 hasAuthorship W4384665852A5061292618 @default.
• W4384665852 hasAuthorship W4384665852A5073778483 @default.
• W4384665852 hasAuthorship W4384665852A5080632612 @default.
• W4384665852 hasBestOaLocation W43846658521 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C132721684 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C151319957 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C153258448 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C155032097 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C2780365114 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C41291067 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C50644808 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConcept C81184566 @default.
• W4384665852 hasConceptScore W4384665852C111919701 @default.

• next