FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4384698043> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4384698043 endingPage "25" @default.
• W4384698043 startingPage "14" @default.
• W4384698043 abstract "The relevance of the study is due to the difficulties inherent in the selection of tools designed for effective project management in the financial sector, as well as the increasing competition in the financial services market. Within the framework of this article, the features of the choice of a project management tool in the financial sector based on the use of quantitative methods that make the decision-making process significantly more meaningful and effective are disclosed. The aim of the study is to develop elements of a methodology for quantitative analysis of alternative tools, including recommendations on the choice of alternatives and criteria for their analysis, as well as the complex use of various methods to justify the final choice of an instrument. The research materials and methods reflected in the methodology of quantitative analysis of alternative project management tools in the financial sphere, and implemented in the course of the research, are based on supplementing the results obtained through the use of the classical basic level method – the method of geometric averages by methods of advanced level decision theory – the method of eigenvalues and vectors, as well as the ideal point method. In order to comprehensively analyze the project implementation support systems on the market and their instrumental capabilities, a twostage methodology is proposed in the research process, including both qualitative and quantitative assessment of available alternatives. The formalized assessment of the functionality of the pre-selected tools made it possible to justify the choice of the most preferred alternative. Particular attention is paid to the issues of attracting additional information to reduce uncertainty in the considered choice situation. Results. The main result of the conducted research was the scheme of substantiation of the optimal choice of a tool includes the construction of a variety of alternatives – tools of domestic and foreign development, the construction of a variety of criteria and the attraction of additional information to form a hierarchy of criteria, as well as a consistent quantitative assessment of each selected alternative according to all the criteria under consideration. The constructed set of alternatives includes the tools of Jira Software, Asana, Bitrix24, Megaplan, GanttPro, YouGile and Planfix. The set of criteria is limited to the six most significant criteria: “Convenience of communication within the framework of the tool”; “Price of the tool”; “Level of complexity of the tool”; “Integration with external services”; “Functionality of the tool”; “Convenience and simplicity of the tool interface”. The presented system of criteria takes into account the main functional and instrumental characteristics necessary for systems to support the implementation of projects in the financial sector at the level of small and medium-sized businesses. Conclusion . The content of the article can be useful for improving decision-making processes during technological renewal and digitalization of projects in the financial sphere of small and medium-sized businesses in the context of the implementation of import substitution programs, the development of optimal choice mechanisms under several criteria. The described structure of the applied problem of multi-criteria selection can be used to update the content of such professionally significant academic disciplines for higher economic school as “Decision Theory” and “Instrumental methods in Economics”." @default.
• W4384698043 created "2023-07-20" @default.
• W4384698043 creator A5000014979 @default.
• W4384698043 creator A5016829266 @default.
• W4384698043 creator A5077909899 @default.
• W4384698043 date "2023-07-18" @default.
• W4384698043 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4384698043 title "Quantitative Methods of Selecting a Tool for Project Management in the Financial Sector" @default.
• W4384698043 cites W2914053059 @default.
• W4384698043 cites W3047001069 @default.
• W4384698043 cites W4210879217 @default.
• W4384698043 cites W4225815717 @default.
• W4384698043 cites W4368248790 @default.
• W4384698043 doi "https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2023-3-14-25" @default.
• W4384698043 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4384698043 type Work @default.
• W4384698043 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4384698043 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4384698043 hasAuthorship W4384698043A5000014979 @default.
• W4384698043 hasAuthorship W4384698043A5016829266 @default.
• W4384698043 hasAuthorship W4384698043A5077909899 @default.
• W4384698043 hasBestOaLocation W43846980431 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C28719098 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C91306197 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C95986675 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C10138342 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C111919701 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C112930515 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C144133560 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C158154518 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C162324750 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C17744445 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C182306322 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C185592680 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C18903297 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C195094911 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C199539241 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C2524010 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C28719098 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C33923547 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C41008148 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C43617362 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C539667460 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C86803240 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C91306197 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C95986675 @default.
• W4384698043 hasConceptScore W4384698043C98045186 @default.
• W4384698043 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4384698043 hasLocation W43846980431 @default.
• W4384698043 hasOpenAccess W4384698043 @default.
• W4384698043 hasPrimaryLocation W43846980431 @default.
• W4384698043 hasRelatedWork W1528035196 @default.
• W4384698043 hasRelatedWork W1971465213 @default.
• W4384698043 hasRelatedWork W199709828 @default.
• W4384698043 hasRelatedWork W2017052501 @default.
• W4384698043 hasRelatedWork W2131624937 @default.
• W4384698043 hasRelatedWork W2353783177 @default.
• W4384698043 hasRelatedWork W2391977487 @default.
• W4384698043 hasRelatedWork W2738725851 @default.
• W4384698043 hasRelatedWork W3136045837 @default.
• W4384698043 hasRelatedWork W4366451079 @default.
• W4384698043 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W4384698043 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4384698043 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4384698043 workType "article" @default.