Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4385189060> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 57 of
57
with 100 items per page.
- W4385189060 endingPage "134" @default.
- W4385189060 startingPage "125" @default.
- W4385189060 abstract "Em seu livro recente, Engelmann (2021) avançou uma leitura do Tractatus que, a seu ver, removeria as dificuldades presentes em outras leituras (em particular, nas leituras “metafísica” e “resoluta”). Neste artigo, ocupar-me-ei da crítica de Engelmann às leituras metafísicas do Tractatus. Tal crítica baseia-se na ideia de que essas leituras estão comprometidas com algumas necessidades de re, o que violaria a autonomia da lógica e a ideia Tractariana segundo a qual só há necessidade lógica. Analisarei o caso particular de uma suposta necessidade de re, a saber, a do número de objetos no mundo. Depois de descrever alguns aspectos positivos e alguns obstáculos à interpretação de Engelmann desse caso, sugerirei que Engelmann está inconscientemente atribuindo ao Tractatus uma concepção de lógica que Wittgenstein, por sua vez, criticamente atribuiu a Russell e a Ramsey e que, portanto, não pode ser a sua. Por fim, retornarei à motivação original para a interpretação de Engelmann, que é a de salvar a autonomia da lógica, mostrando de maneira breve como conciliar a autonomia da lógica com um número fixo de objetos.AbstractIn a recent book, Engelmann (2021) has put forward a reading of the Tractatus which he maintains would remove the difficulties presented in other readings, particularly the “metaphysical” and the “resolute” readings. In this paper, my concern will be with Engelmann’s criticism of the metaphysical readings of the Tractatus. This criticism is centered on the idea that such readings are committed to some de re necessities,which violates the autonomy of logic and the Tractarian idea that there is only logical necessity. I analyze the particular case of a supposed de re necessity, namely, the number of objects in the world. After describing some positive aspects and drawbacks of Engelmann’s interpretation of this case, I suggest that Engelmann is unconsciously attributing to the Tractatus a conception of logic that Wittgenstein in turncritically attributed to Russell and Ramsey; thus, this conception cannot be his own. Finally, I return to the original motivation for Engelmann’s interpretation, which is to save the autonomy of logic, and briefly show how to conciliate the autonomy of logic with a fixed number of objects." @default.
- W4385189060 created "2023-07-25" @default.
- W4385189060 creator A5046662790 @default.
- W4385189060 date "2023-07-24" @default.
- W4385189060 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W4385189060 title "The Number of Things in the World and the Autonomy of Logic" @default.
- W4385189060 doi "https://doi.org/10.35920/1414-3004.2021v25n2-2p125-134" @default.
- W4385189060 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4385189060 type Work @default.
- W4385189060 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4385189060 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4385189060 hasAuthorship W4385189060A5046662790 @default.
- W4385189060 hasBestOaLocation W43851890601 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C182744844 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C111472728 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C124952713 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C138885662 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C142362112 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C15708023 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C17744445 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C182744844 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C199539241 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C41895202 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C554936623 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C65414064 @default.
- W4385189060 hasConceptScore W4385189060C7991579 @default.
- W4385189060 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W4385189060 hasLocation W43851890601 @default.
- W4385189060 hasOpenAccess W4385189060 @default.
- W4385189060 hasPrimaryLocation W43851890601 @default.
- W4385189060 hasRelatedWork W115708313 @default.
- W4385189060 hasRelatedWork W2051157668 @default.
- W4385189060 hasRelatedWork W2344930250 @default.
- W4385189060 hasRelatedWork W2594235377 @default.
- W4385189060 hasRelatedWork W2615415291 @default.
- W4385189060 hasRelatedWork W2900800520 @default.
- W4385189060 hasRelatedWork W3009088715 @default.
- W4385189060 hasRelatedWork W3209062011 @default.
- W4385189060 hasRelatedWork W4211226364 @default.
- W4385189060 hasRelatedWork W4383477985 @default.
- W4385189060 hasVolume "25" @default.
- W4385189060 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4385189060 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4385189060 workType "article" @default.