FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4385319723> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4385319723 endingPage "39" @default.
• W4385319723 startingPage "36" @default.
• W4385319723 abstract "The August 2022 issue of JPT featured an article on the most common voluntary certifications that have at least some kind of methane emissions-related requirements. Since then, MiQ appears to have become a certification framework of choice for many industry players. According to Georges Tijbosch, CEO of MiQ, as of January 2023, about 20% of US natural gas production has gone through the MiQ process. Tijbosch noted that most of the currently certified production received grades A, B, or C. While this is no high school, we naturally tend to assume that getting an “A” is the ultimate goal of getting certified. It might be true for some; however, as we all realize after graduating schools and universities and upon entering the workforce, life is quite often more about continuous improvement over time vs. achieving the top grade as such. This article is aimed at exploring the MiQ grading framework in more detail and explaining practical pathways for industry participants to achieve any desired MiQ grade. For simplicity, we will focus on the MiQ Standard—Onshore Production, but the fundamental concepts are applicable to other industry segments. The MiQ Standard scores a facility based on three broad categories. - Methane-intensity quantitative metric - Monitoring technology deployment - Company practices related to the methane emissions management Each of these categories is scored by an auditor accredited to conduct MiQ audits and who is an independent subject matter expert in the fields of methane mitigation, monitoring, and accounting. The combined score across the three categories results in a letter grade on the MiQ certificate issued for that facility’s production. Natural gas buyers (typically utility companies or industrial users) then request certain volumes of certified gas and, depending on the targeted end use and other factors, may specify a desired grade. Roy Hartstein is an emissions subject matter expert, as well as founder and president of Responsible Energy Solutions, an organization that performs certification assessments and helps companies prepare for certification. Hartstein and his team have conducted over a dozen MiQ audits. He talks about three aspects of value that motivate natural gas producers to improve from a non-A to an A grade: 1) possibility of earning a higher premium on the sold certified gas; 2) internal risk management across several avenues such as safety, identification of malfunctioning equipment, or early detection of operational inefficiencies; and 3) alleviating environmental concerns of the investment community. He believes this advances a long-term strategy to secure oil and gas’s potential as part of the future energy mix. Regardless of the underlying motivation, most of us like to think we are straight-A students and don’t want to bring home a report card with a lower grade. But at the time a company initiates the certification process, they may find they qualify for a lower (i.e., non-A) grade. What are the potential implications of this?" @default.
• W4385319723 created "2023-07-28" @default.
• W4385319723 creator A5052526470 @default.
• W4385319723 date "2023-06-01" @default.
• W4385319723 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4385319723 title "Journey to an “A” Grade Gas Certification" @default.
• W4385319723 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/0623-0036-jpt" @default.
• W4385319723 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4385319723 type Work @default.
• W4385319723 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4385319723 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4385319723 hasAuthorship W4385319723A5052526470 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C2778348673 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConcept C46304622 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C121955636 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C127413603 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C139719470 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C144133560 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C147176958 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C162324750 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C187736073 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C199521495 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C21547014 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C2777286243 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C2778348673 @default.
• W4385319723 hasConceptScore W4385319723C46304622 @default.
• W4385319723 hasIssue "06" @default.
• W4385319723 hasLocation W43853197231 @default.
• W4385319723 hasOpenAccess W4385319723 @default.
• W4385319723 hasPrimaryLocation W43853197231 @default.
• W4385319723 hasRelatedWork W1923116273 @default.
• W4385319723 hasRelatedWork W2151590264 @default.
• W4385319723 hasRelatedWork W2360649482 @default.
• W4385319723 hasRelatedWork W2367274090 @default.
• W4385319723 hasRelatedWork W2381327865 @default.
• W4385319723 hasRelatedWork W2765736703 @default.
• W4385319723 hasRelatedWork W2888034390 @default.
• W4385319723 hasRelatedWork W293545476 @default.
• W4385319723 hasRelatedWork W3119521567 @default.
• W4385319723 hasRelatedWork W4375950631 @default.
• W4385319723 hasVolume "75" @default.
• W4385319723 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4385319723 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4385319723 workType "article" @default.