FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4385337145> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4385337145 endingPage "e18795" @default.
• W4385337145 startingPage "e18795" @default.
• W4385337145 abstract "IntroductionHamstring injuries are one of the most common types of damage in sports. Insufficient flexibility and high stiffness are important reasons for it. Stretching is often used in warm-up activities before exercises to increase flexibility, among which dynamic stretching (DS) and static stretching (SS) are the most widely used. The effects of these two stretching techniques on the flexibility or stiffness of the hamstring still need to be clarified.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the short-term, medium-term, and long-term effects of DS and SS on improving hamstring flexibility and stiffness via a meta-analysis of RCTs.MethodsRCTs were identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PEDro from inception to July 28, 2022. The methodological quality was evaluated using the PEDro scale. The mean difference and 95% confidence interval of the outcome variables before and after stretching were calculated and the extracted data were quantitatively processed using a random or fixed effects model.ResultsA total of 27 RCTs and 606 participants were included. In terms of improving the ROM of the hamstring, there was no significant difference in the acute (MD, −0.70, 95% CI, −1.54 to 0.14; Z = 1.63, P > 0.05) and sub-acute effects (MD, 1.71, 95% CI, −2.80 to 6.22; Z = 0.74, P > 0.05) between a single bout of SS and DS, while the acute (MD, −5.13, 95% CI, −7.65 to −2.61; Z = 3.99, P < 0.05) and sub-acute effects (MD, −5.30, 95% CI, −6.33 to −4.27; Z = 10.04, P < 0.05) of multiple bouts of SS was superior to DS; There was no significant difference in the medium-term effect between the two stretching techniques (MD, 3.48, 95% CI, −2.57 to 9.53; Z = 1.13, P > 0.05), but the long-term effect of SS was better than DS (MD, - 10.40, 95% CI, −10.97 to −9.83; Z = 35.57, P < 0.05). Regarding the length of the hamstring, the acute (MD, −0.41, 95% CI, −1.09 to 0.26; Z = 1.20, P > 0.05) and sub-acute effects (MD, −0.73, 95% CI, −1.69 to 0.22; Z = 1.51, P > 0.05) of a single bout of DS and SS were similar. Two studies have compared the effects on hamstring stiffness, with one showing similar effects, and the other showed that DS was superior to SS. One study showed no difference in the magnitude of change in improving passive torque. No studies explored the effect of DS and SS on hamstring myofascial length. Only one study demonstrated no significant difference in hamstring thickness.ConclusionsA single bout of DS and SS have similar short-term effects in improving hamstring ROM and length, while multiple bouts of SS can significantly improve hamstring ROM compared to DS. DS and SS showed similar effects on hamstring myofascial length." @default.
• W4385337145 created "2023-07-29" @default.
• W4385337145 creator A5051202105 @default.
• W4385337145 creator A5075474462 @default.
• W4385337145 creator A5081730908 @default.
• W4385337145 date "2023-08-01" @default.
• W4385337145 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W4385337145 title "Dynamic and static stretching on hamstring flexibility and stiffness: A systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W4385337145 cites W1504756698 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W1636095889 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W1935857473 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W1936202382 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W1964374958 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W1965109576 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W1966148290 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W1982443218 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W1983757256 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W1988586705 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W1996172253 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2010726156 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2013931201 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2026684432 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2051287209 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2053864537 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2062152039 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2063475913 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2072813407 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2081992768 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2088767850 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2090510226 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2097071651 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2114427320 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2119155501 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2127818482 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2154596543 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2155187718 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2190549657 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2219644172 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2334533828 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2529867986 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2574199773 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2591980458 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2614324983 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2743767596 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2765463149 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2802094363 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2803467576 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2904850448 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2906085612 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2954660544 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2975342219 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2981640354 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2982853101 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2997035319 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W3007838428 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W3012977184 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W3016590935 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W3041596359 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W3048988734 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W3081863794 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W3139299213 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W3147469459 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W3158308922 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W3215110107 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W4285719527 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W4287444443 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W4311118041 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W4313588625 @default.
• W4385337145 cites W2151981674 @default.
• W4385337145 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18795" @default.
• W4385337145 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37560703" @default.
• W4385337145 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4385337145 type Work @default.
• W4385337145 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4385337145 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4385337145 hasAuthorship W4385337145A5051202105 @default.
• W4385337145 hasAuthorship W4385337145A5075474462 @default.
• W4385337145 hasAuthorship W4385337145A5081730908 @default.
• W4385337145 hasBestOaLocation W43853371451 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C2776141760 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C2777013735 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C2779372316 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C2780598303 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConceptScore W4385337145C105795698 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConceptScore W4385337145C126322002 @default.
• W4385337145 hasConceptScore W4385337145C159985019 @default.

• next