FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4385440694> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4385440694 endingPage "4932" @default.
• W4385440694 startingPage "4919" @default.
• W4385440694 abstract "Until now, there has been no systematic review or meta-analysis of direct head-to-head studies that compare two liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) algorithms, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) LI-RADS and contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) LI-RADS, for the diagnostic efficacy of hepatocellular carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to identify and head-to-head compare the diagnostic performance of both LI-RADS algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma.We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from the inception of each database to April 26, 2022, to find the comparative study of both LI-RADS algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma at risk of patients who underwent both LI-RADS algorithms. Eligibility criteria included only studies published in English, full reports published, both retrospective and prospective studies. Liver histology or imaging follow-up results served as the reference standard. We analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve to determine summary estimates. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies was utilized to assess the methodological quality.In 5 included studies (831 patients, 877 lesions), the pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity of CEUS LR-5 were 0.79, 0.81, and 0.78, 0.79 in CT/MRI LR-5, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity of CEUS LR-4/5 were 0.86, 0.70, and 0.93, 0.59 in CT/MRI LR-4/5, respectively. There was no obvious difference between the two LI-RADS algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma, and there was no significant statistical difference between two LR-M algorithms for non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancies.The results of our analysis demonstrated that CEUS LI-RADS has satisfactory diagnostic performance similar to that of CT/MRI LI-RADS, which provides a theoretical basis for the popularization of CEUS LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC. This work was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2020YFS0211). We registered this study on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42022328107) before the search step." @default.
• W4385440694 created "2023-08-01" @default.
• W4385440694 creator A5021557545 @default.
• W4385440694 creator A5024120345 @default.
• W4385440694 creator A5033020983 @default.
• W4385440694 creator A5036325034 @default.
• W4385440694 creator A5075566042 @default.
• W4385440694 creator A5075835974 @default.
• W4385440694 date "2023-08-01" @default.
• W4385440694 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4385440694 title "Compared with CT/MRI LI-RADS, whether CEUS LI-RADS is worth popularizing in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma?—a direct head-to-head meta-analysis" @default.
• W4385440694 cites W1814665428 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W1963666575 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2047554241 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2060734444 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2107638293 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2125580748 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2591927678 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2747718548 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2754397122 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2785704959 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2796067155 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2801649569 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2892178669 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2893608205 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2921360370 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2963203040 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W2969695174 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3005312646 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3007441395 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3012317282 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3049289405 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3106090156 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3118407760 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3131819704 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3131847007 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3155754213 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3157999465 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3165076180 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3165223540 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3197616399 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W3212257223 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W4200105709 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W4206629260 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W4210936762 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W4211023549 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W4280641479 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W4281760967 @default.
• W4385440694 cites W4304687571 @default.
• W4385440694 doi "https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-1383" @default.
• W4385440694 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37581040" @default.
• W4385440694 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4385440694 type Work @default.
• W4385440694 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4385440694 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4385440694 hasAuthorship W4385440694A5021557545 @default.
• W4385440694 hasAuthorship W4385440694A5024120345 @default.
• W4385440694 hasAuthorship W4385440694A5033020983 @default.
• W4385440694 hasAuthorship W4385440694A5036325034 @default.
• W4385440694 hasAuthorship W4385440694A5075566042 @default.
• W4385440694 hasAuthorship W4385440694A5075835974 @default.
• W4385440694 hasBestOaLocation W43854406941 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C144494922 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C157481446 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C2778019345 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C3020132585 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C126322002 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C126838900 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C143409427 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C143753070 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C144494922 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C157481446 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C2776478404 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C2778019345 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C2989005 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C3020132585 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C44249647 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C58471807 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C71924100 @default.
• W4385440694 hasConceptScore W4385440694C95190672 @default.
• W4385440694 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W4385440694 hasLocation W43854406941 @default.
• W4385440694 hasLocation W43854406942 @default.
• W4385440694 hasLocation W43854406943 @default.
• W4385440694 hasOpenAccess W4385440694 @default.
• W4385440694 hasPrimaryLocation W43854406941 @default.
• W4385440694 hasRelatedWork W2790511401 @default.
• W4385440694 hasRelatedWork W2946333558 @default.

• next