Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4385648189> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 57 of
57
with 100 items per page.
- W4385648189 endingPage "S165" @default.
- W4385648189 startingPage "S165" @default.
- W4385648189 abstract "Introduction Assistance to people suffering serious mental illnesses has undergone large variations in the last twocenturies. After World War II, The community became a new destination for them.But hardly anyone knew how to cope with mental illness in thecommunity. Thus, several initiatives arose in the US. Both social work and psychiatry,moved towards a pragmatic point of view by the rising tide of patients seeking help: initiatives trying to providesolutions to themost basic needs of patients: accommodation, food,medical care, takingof medication, etc. By the 1970s, Mary Ann Test and LeonardStein had proven the effectiveness of theirLife Coaching in Madison, Wisconsin. In 1981 his program is disseminated by several states under the name of Assertive TreatmentCommunity and thus spread throughout the United Statesand Canada, Australia and Europe. Psychiatry has recognized it as the program that got the most for supporting the community model. 50 years later the basics of the TAC model remain more or less thesame. But home interventions caused a continuous conflict in the ethical field notwell addressed… Objectives WHY IS AN ACT team a fertile ground for ethicalconflicts?This approach is coercive or assertive?There are several reasons. There is a specific ETHICAL ENVIRONMENT in THE ACT team 1.“Diffusion of Responsibility”- 2. Mutual confirmation bias: 3. There is a tendency to think that professionals areethical by nature. 4. Biased search for information when problems arise. Sources are sought to confirm us before clarifying whathappened 5. A special tendency to conformism. 6.Repetitive responses. Methods We will analyze the main ethical conflicts arising in ACT teams: 1. CONFLICTS OF AUTONOMY 2. PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY ISSUES 3. CONFLICTS OF DUTIES 4. ASSERTIVENESS VERSUS COERCION Results The great challenge is knowing how and when to intervenewith patients with variable decision-making capacity orwithout any insight, as well as the impact on theirautonomy. It is an exercise both in art and inphenomenological training: Because there are subtledeficits, difficult to appreciate, but there are otherdeficits that are obvious. Conclusions The challenge: balancing the needs and safety of thecommunity with the needs and safety of the individual.ACT teams staff must juggle both perspectives, whilemaintaining a therapeutic alliance. The continuous contact with the patient in an ACT teamgives, especially to clinicians, a privileged place ofobservation to act correctly in those situations and to be asupport so that whoever arrives lacking in affectivity orwith relational problems could grow until reaching a moreprudent and competent judgment. WHAT COULD HAPPEN IF WE TRAIN PROFESSIONAL IN BIOETHICS MORE IN PATIENT´S RIGHTS, A FIELD FOR LAWYERS?? Disclosure of Interest None Declared" @default.
- W4385648189 created "2023-08-09" @default.
- W4385648189 creator A5044095341 @default.
- W4385648189 date "2023-03-01" @default.
- W4385648189 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W4385648189 title "Ethical issues in assertive outreach and crisis intervention teams" @default.
- W4385648189 doi "https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.401" @default.
- W4385648189 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4385648189 type Work @default.
- W4385648189 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4385648189 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4385648189 hasAuthorship W4385648189A5044095341 @default.
- W4385648189 hasBestOaLocation W43856481891 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C151799412 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C2776674806 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C2781400479 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C118552586 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C134362201 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C151799412 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C15744967 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C17744445 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C199539241 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C27415008 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C2776674806 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C2780665704 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C2781400479 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C39549134 @default.
- W4385648189 hasConceptScore W4385648189C77805123 @default.
- W4385648189 hasIssue "S1" @default.
- W4385648189 hasLocation W43856481891 @default.
- W4385648189 hasOpenAccess W4385648189 @default.
- W4385648189 hasPrimaryLocation W43856481891 @default.
- W4385648189 hasRelatedWork W1909808695 @default.
- W4385648189 hasRelatedWork W2096121282 @default.
- W4385648189 hasRelatedWork W2098309872 @default.
- W4385648189 hasRelatedWork W2135801863 @default.
- W4385648189 hasRelatedWork W2207934733 @default.
- W4385648189 hasRelatedWork W2335818225 @default.
- W4385648189 hasRelatedWork W2435230023 @default.
- W4385648189 hasRelatedWork W2464341055 @default.
- W4385648189 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W4385648189 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W4385648189 hasVolume "66" @default.
- W4385648189 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4385648189 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4385648189 workType "article" @default.