Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4385662261> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 78 of
78
with 100 items per page.
- W4385662261 abstract "Poetry can be experienced in multiple sensory modalities – for example, someone might read a written poem (i.e., visual modality) or listen to a spoken poem (i.e., an auditory modality). Readers may also follow along with a written poem while listening to the spoken version, and therefore experience poems in a multimodal manner. Here, we examined whether aesthetic judgments of poems differ based on the sensory modality in which they are experienced. In the present study, participants (N=233) rated three subjective characteristics of poems (vividness of evoked imagery, emotional valence, and emotional arousal), as well as the overall aesthetic appeal of the poems. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the three modalities: text-only (N=81), audio-only (N=74), or combined audio/text (N=78). Our results showed that participants found the audio-only modality to be the least aesthetically appealing, as compared to visual-only and combined audiovisual. Additionally, we found that vividness of imagery was the most important predictor of aesthetic appeal overall (across all three modalities) but also identified a significant interaction between stimulus modality and imagery such that vividness was most important for text-only poems. Finally, we replicated prior work on individual differences in aesthetic appeal, as our results indicate low interrater agreement for aesthetic appeal ratings of poems. These findings contribute to our understanding of the complexity of the aesthetic experience in poetry and highlight the significance of individual differences and the role of modality in its appreciation." @default.
- W4385662261 created "2023-08-09" @default.
- W4385662261 creator A5002476360 @default.
- W4385662261 creator A5018663615 @default.
- W4385662261 creator A5024931610 @default.
- W4385662261 creator A5092613151 @default.
- W4385662261 date "2023-08-07" @default.
- W4385662261 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W4385662261 title "The influence of sensory modality on aesthetic judgments of poetry" @default.
- W4385662261 doi "https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cv6px" @default.
- W4385662261 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4385662261 type Work @default.
- W4385662261 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4385662261 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W4385662261 hasAuthorship W4385662261A5002476360 @default.
- W4385662261 hasAuthorship W4385662261A5018663615 @default.
- W4385662261 hasAuthorship W4385662261A5024931610 @default.
- W4385662261 hasAuthorship W4385662261A5092613151 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C168900304 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C177291462 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C26486553 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C2779903281 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C2779918689 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C2780226545 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConcept C94487597 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C107457646 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C121332964 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C124952713 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C142362112 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C144024400 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C15744967 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C164913051 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C168900304 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C177291462 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C17744445 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C180747234 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C199539241 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C26486553 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C2778449503 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C2779903281 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C2779918689 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C2780226545 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C36289849 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C41008148 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C46312422 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C62520636 @default.
- W4385662261 hasConceptScore W4385662261C94487597 @default.
- W4385662261 hasLocation W43856622611 @default.
- W4385662261 hasOpenAccess W4385662261 @default.
- W4385662261 hasPrimaryLocation W43856622611 @default.
- W4385662261 hasRelatedWork W1540085252 @default.
- W4385662261 hasRelatedWork W2059132599 @default.
- W4385662261 hasRelatedWork W2099817904 @default.
- W4385662261 hasRelatedWork W2104673044 @default.
- W4385662261 hasRelatedWork W2108201743 @default.
- W4385662261 hasRelatedWork W2108375620 @default.
- W4385662261 hasRelatedWork W2132376530 @default.
- W4385662261 hasRelatedWork W2147487149 @default.
- W4385662261 hasRelatedWork W2749511277 @default.
- W4385662261 hasRelatedWork W2914599329 @default.
- W4385662261 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4385662261 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4385662261 workType "article" @default.