Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4385752196> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 96 of
96
with 100 items per page.
- W4385752196 abstract "Surgical treatment is the commonly preferred method for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures (AATRs) due to advantages such as less re-rupture rates, better functional results, and an early return to physical activities. The main aim of our study is to compare two common minimally invasive surgical methods, the limited open and the percutaneous approaches, regarding clinical outcomes.A total of 53 patients (19 females and 34 males) who were treated with limited open (Group 1: 30 patients) and percutaneous (Group 2: 23 patients) approaches for AATRs were retrospectively evaluated between March 2019 and May 2020 in a level 1 trauma center. The evaluation included complications (soft tissue and skin problems, re-rupture, and sural nerve injury rates), the operation time, the duration of return to daily activities, The Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), and the American Ortho-pedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores of the patients at the first and 6th months of follow-up. Patients' activity levels were compared with the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS).The mean age of all patients in this cohort was 45.1±14.1. The mean postoperative follow-up period for group 1 was 36.9±8.81 weeks, whereas, for group 2, it was 35.4±8.73 weeks (P=0.24). The mean age (P=0.47), gender distribution (P=0.41), and body mass index (P=0.29) were similar for both groups. The mean operation time (group 1: 47.1±5.4 vs. group 2: 44.4±6.1, P=0.06) and the duration of return to daily activities (group 1: 49.2±7.4 vs. group 2: 48.5±9.7, P=0.38) were also similar. There was no statistical difference between groups regarding functional results at first (ATRS: group 1: 79.9±3.2 vs. group 2: 79.5±3.9, [P=0.35], and AOFAS: group 1: 80.9±3.1 vs. group 2: 82.1±3.2, [P=0.10]) and 6th months (ATRS: group 1: 85.0±3.8 vs. group 2: 83.7±4.4, [P=0.13], and AO-FAS: group 1: 86.6±3.6 vs. group 2: 86.7±4.2, [P=0.46]). There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding preoperative and last follow-up TAS scores (P= 0.94 and P=0.46, respectively). We observed no postoperative complications in group 1. There were three complications (13.1%) in group 2. One patient (4.4%) had a re-rupture, and two patients (8.7%) had sural nerve injuries.Although both groups had similar functional results, the limited open approach yielded better clinical outcomes according to the complication results than the percutaneous approach." @default.
- W4385752196 created "2023-08-12" @default.
- W4385752196 creator A5005650805 @default.
- W4385752196 creator A5032573541 @default.
- W4385752196 creator A5054259964 @default.
- W4385752196 creator A5058126509 @default.
- W4385752196 creator A5064918756 @default.
- W4385752196 creator A5080599961 @default.
- W4385752196 creator A5087918099 @default.
- W4385752196 date "2023-01-01" @default.
- W4385752196 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
- W4385752196 title "A clinical comparison of two different surgical techniques in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: Limited-open approach vs. percutaneous approach" @default.
- W4385752196 cites W1886887566 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W1986309226 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2000849577 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2039781989 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2055002324 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2055174038 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2098446181 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2146796167 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2314669084 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2403672099 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2558813988 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2594279924 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2766439529 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2897931930 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2900875751 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W2915168955 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W3015058003 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W3022113466 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W3033364758 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W3034107858 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W3043910723 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W3121623982 @default.
- W4385752196 cites W3209540485 @default.
- W4385752196 doi "https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.90839" @default.
- W4385752196 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37563893" @default.
- W4385752196 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4385752196 type Work @default.
- W4385752196 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4385752196 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4385752196 hasAuthorship W4385752196A5005650805 @default.
- W4385752196 hasAuthorship W4385752196A5032573541 @default.
- W4385752196 hasAuthorship W4385752196A5054259964 @default.
- W4385752196 hasAuthorship W4385752196A5058126509 @default.
- W4385752196 hasAuthorship W4385752196A5064918756 @default.
- W4385752196 hasAuthorship W4385752196A5080599961 @default.
- W4385752196 hasAuthorship W4385752196A5087918099 @default.
- W4385752196 hasBestOaLocation W43857521961 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C190385971 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C2778640784 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C2780105995 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C2780923182 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C2780984734 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C2781317629 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C85004164 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C126322002 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C141071460 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C167135981 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C190385971 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C2778640784 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C2780105995 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C2780221984 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C2780813298 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C2780923182 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C2780984734 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C2781317629 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C3017944768 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C71924100 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C85004164 @default.
- W4385752196 hasConceptScore W4385752196C99454951 @default.
- W4385752196 hasLocation W43857521961 @default.
- W4385752196 hasLocation W43857521962 @default.
- W4385752196 hasOpenAccess W4385752196 @default.
- W4385752196 hasPrimaryLocation W43857521961 @default.
- W4385752196 hasRelatedWork W2012701364 @default.
- W4385752196 hasRelatedWork W2040810660 @default.
- W4385752196 hasRelatedWork W2349443577 @default.
- W4385752196 hasRelatedWork W2370414487 @default.
- W4385752196 hasRelatedWork W2392146966 @default.
- W4385752196 hasRelatedWork W2917135707 @default.
- W4385752196 hasRelatedWork W2982644181 @default.
- W4385752196 hasRelatedWork W3083106124 @default.
- W4385752196 hasRelatedWork W4206754923 @default.
- W4385752196 hasRelatedWork W4224110163 @default.
- W4385752196 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4385752196 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4385752196 workType "article" @default.