FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4385763639> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4385763639 endingPage "942" @default.
• W4385763639 startingPage "942" @default.
• W4385763639 abstract "(2980) Rubus repens (L.) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 1: 223. 5 Nov 1891 (Dalibarda repens L., Sp. Pl.: 491. 1 Mai 1753) [Angiosp.: Ros.], nom. cons. prop. Lectotypus (vide Reveal in Regnum Veg. 127: 41. 1993): Kalm, Herb. Linnaeus No. 653.24 (LINN). (H) Rubus repens Weston, Bot. Univ. 1: 257. 11 Oct 1770, nom. rej. prop. Typus: non designatus. The false violet or dewdrop is a creeping herb of the forest floor native to north-eastern North America. Linnaeus described the species as Dalibarda repens L. (Sp. Pl.: 491. 1753). In the second edition of Species plantarum, Linnaeus considered Dalibarda to be a synonym of Rubus, renaming D. repens as R. dalibarda L. (Sp. Pl., ed. 2: 708. 1762). This name is illegitimate as the epithet ‘repens’ was then available for use in Rubus. Since Linnaeus's time opinions have differed on whether or not to recognise Dalibarda as a separate genus. Recent molecular phylogenies support inclusion of Dalibarda within Rubus (Huang & al. in Taxon 72: 278–306. 2023). Those favouring this classification have referred to the false violet as R. repens (L.) Kuntze (Alice & al. in Fl. N. Amer. 9: 51. 2014). However, it transpires that this is an illegitimate later homonym as R. repens Weston (Bot. Univ. 1: 257. 1770) has priority over Kuntze's combination. Rubus repens Weston is entirely based on the description of a bramble from Sicily published by Cupani (Hort. Cathol., ed. 2: 193. 1696). No potential types have been traced among the extant herbarium material or published illustrations left by Cupani (Van de Beek in Adansonia, sér. 2, 38: 42. 2016), so the identity of the species remains unresolved. Gussone (Fl. Sicul. Syn. 1: 567. 1843) cited Cupani's description under R. acheruntinus (Ten.) Ten. (Syll. Pl. Fl. Neapol.: 603. 1831) without explanation. Rubus acheruntinus is also an uncertain taxon, probably representing a hybrid between R. caesius L. and another local species (A. van de Beek, pers. comm.). What is more certain is that R. repens Weston is an obscure name, not listed in IPNI, that has been generally overlooked and never taken up by any author after Weston. “Rubus repens” also appears in Gueldenstaedt (Reis. Russland: 4, 197. 1791), but the designation is not validly published in the absence of a description or diagnosis, or reference to a previously published description or diagnosis. The strict application of the rules of priority would require a new name in Rubus for Dalibarda repens L., as there appear to be no heterotypic synonyms at species rank available. The loss of R. repens (L.) Kuntze for purely nomenclatural reasons is best avoided as the conflicting homonym is scarcely known and has not been used in 250 years. This can be achieved by conserving Kuntze's combination against Weston's name, as proposed here. Thanks go to Abraham van de Beek for advice concerning Weston's name and its possible identity." @default.
• W4385763639 created "2023-08-12" @default.
• W4385763639 creator A5056606718 @default.
• W4385763639 date "2023-08-01" @default.
• W4385763639 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4385763639 title "(2980) Proposal to conserve the name <i>Rubus repens</i> (L.) Kuntze against <i>R. repens</i> Weston (<i>Rosaceae</i>)" @default.
• W4385763639 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12999" @default.
• W4385763639 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4385763639 type Work @default.
• W4385763639 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4385763639 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4385763639 hasAuthorship W4385763639A5056606718 @default.
• W4385763639 hasBestOaLocation W43857636391 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConcept C157369684 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConcept C173483453 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConcept C195165211 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConcept C2777220221 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConcept C2777535023 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConcept C2779852090 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConcept C514705636 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConcept C58642233 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConcept C78945076 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConceptScore W4385763639C157369684 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConceptScore W4385763639C173483453 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConceptScore W4385763639C195165211 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConceptScore W4385763639C2777220221 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConceptScore W4385763639C2777535023 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConceptScore W4385763639C2779852090 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConceptScore W4385763639C514705636 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConceptScore W4385763639C58642233 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConceptScore W4385763639C59822182 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConceptScore W4385763639C78945076 @default.
• W4385763639 hasConceptScore W4385763639C86803240 @default.
• W4385763639 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4385763639 hasLocation W43857636391 @default.
• W4385763639 hasOpenAccess W4385763639 @default.
• W4385763639 hasPrimaryLocation W43857636391 @default.
• W4385763639 hasRelatedWork W1906103434 @default.
• W4385763639 hasRelatedWork W2004203073 @default.
• W4385763639 hasRelatedWork W2062218591 @default.
• W4385763639 hasRelatedWork W2089577716 @default.
• W4385763639 hasRelatedWork W2333487931 @default.
• W4385763639 hasRelatedWork W2461005486 @default.
• W4385763639 hasRelatedWork W2464116236 @default.
• W4385763639 hasRelatedWork W2520600848 @default.
• W4385763639 hasRelatedWork W2598265446 @default.
• W4385763639 hasRelatedWork W4385763639 @default.
• W4385763639 hasVolume "72" @default.
• W4385763639 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4385763639 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4385763639 workType "article" @default.