FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4385874352> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4385874352 abstract "Abstract Background Implementation evaluation should focus on implementation success, guided by theories and frameworks. With high staff vacancies in the health services, it is important to consider pragmatic methods of data collection for implementation evaluation. This paper presents a cross-sectional rapid evaluation of a handheld medical device designed for remote examinations, piloted in Northern England. By using downloaded device data and administrative records mapped to domains from the implementation outcomes framework, this evaluation offers a pragmatic example of assessing implementation success. Methods The pilot design was pragmatic: sites volunteered, decided which services to use the device in, and launched when ready. The pilot and evaluation together lasted 1 year. Data was downloaded from the devices, and administrative records for the pilot accessed. Variables were mapped to five of the implementation outcomes, after reviewing with the device manufacturer and pilot team to assess robustness. Results N =352 care episodes were recorded using the device with 223 patients. Out of 19 sites ‘signed up’ to the pilot, 5 launched and delivered 10 of 35 proposed projects: a site and project adoption rate of 26 and 29%, respectively. Six sites signed up to an extension period; three had launched and three had not during the original timelines, indicating some sustainability. Feasibility was high, with only one in seven care episodes needing to be repeated due to poor device quality or error (sound/audio/internet). Fidelity of device usage was low for two of the eight available device examinations. Device and staffing costs were high but potential cost savings were attributable to fewer in-person appointments. Conclusions Through using device and administrative data, this evaluation minimised burden on busy healthcare staff yet was still guided by an evaluation framework. Five out of the eight implementation outcomes were measured, including sustainability and costs. The findings give insight into implementation challenges, particularly around adoption. For future research, it is recommended to engage with staff to prioritise outcome measurements and to focus on meaningful interpretation of indicators." @default.
• W4385874352 created "2023-08-17" @default.
• W4385874352 creator A5002814936 @default.
• W4385874352 creator A5007163474 @default.
• W4385874352 creator A5036440107 @default.
• W4385874352 creator A5040471937 @default.
• W4385874352 date "2023-08-16" @default.
• W4385874352 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4385874352 title "Evaluating change in a pressured healthcare system: a cross-sectional study of implementation outcomes using routine data indicators and proxies" @default.
• W4385874352 cites W1473419983 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W1561399185 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W1965911746 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2007684541 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2013779493 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2020155291 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2090226269 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2101270539 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2120941905 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2125201323 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2128556524 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2136608905 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2140092196 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2186263672 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2216241614 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2346630994 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2413310449 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2416317982 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2750615195 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2760901594 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2883411829 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2938766056 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2948336156 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2966065423 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W2969110433 @default.
• W4385874352 cites W4307842175 @default.
• W4385874352 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00471-x" @default.
• W4385874352 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37587530" @default.
• W4385874352 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4385874352 type Work @default.
• W4385874352 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4385874352 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4385874352 hasAuthorship W4385874352A5002814936 @default.
• W4385874352 hasAuthorship W4385874352A5007163474 @default.
• W4385874352 hasAuthorship W4385874352A5036440107 @default.
• W4385874352 hasAuthorship W4385874352A5040471937 @default.
• W4385874352 hasBestOaLocation W43858743521 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C2776459999 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C2777512617 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C4438859 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C105795698 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C127413603 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C133462117 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C159110408 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C160735492 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C162324750 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C166957645 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C195094911 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C21547014 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C2776459999 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C2777512617 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C33923547 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C41008148 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C4438859 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C50522688 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C71924100 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C76155785 @default.
• W4385874352 hasConceptScore W4385874352C95457728 @default.
• W4385874352 hasFunder F4320319990 @default.
• W4385874352 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4385874352 hasLocation W43858743521 @default.
• W4385874352 hasLocation W43858743522 @default.
• W4385874352 hasOpenAccess W4385874352 @default.
• W4385874352 hasPrimaryLocation W43858743521 @default.
• W4385874352 hasRelatedWork W2090826727 @default.
• W4385874352 hasRelatedWork W2160571484 @default.
• W4385874352 hasRelatedWork W2184513852 @default.
• W4385874352 hasRelatedWork W2275520381 @default.
• W4385874352 hasRelatedWork W2383931288 @default.
• W4385874352 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4385874352 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4385874352 hasRelatedWork W2992357007 @default.
• W4385874352 hasRelatedWork W627595824 @default.
• W4385874352 hasRelatedWork W78714708 @default.
• W4385874352 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W4385874352 isParatext "false" @default.

• next