FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4385988172> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4385988172 endingPage "106002" @default.
• W4385988172 startingPage "106002" @default.
• W4385988172 abstract "In the last decades, a more prudent and rational use of antimicrobials has been progressively directed towards animal production to reduce antimicrobial selective pressure and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in microorganisms and safeguard the antimicrobial efficacy of treatments in human medicine. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of interventions that have been applied to reduce or improve veterinary antimicrobial usage and aimed at decreasing resistant bacteria in chicken broiler and pig production contexts.Original articles were identified by searching PubMed™, Scopus™, The Cochrane Library™, and Web of Science™, and grey literature by searching DANS EASY™, WorldCat™ and RCAAP™. Inclusion criteria included: chicken broiler or pig populations (predestined for meat production), interventions intended to reduce/improve antimicrobial use, comparator with standard or no use of antimicrobials, outcomes related to prevalence of resistant bacteria, farm level studies, original data, and analytical observational studies. Data was extracted from eligible studies and meta-analysis using random or fixed effects models was conducted for combinations including type of intervention, bacterial species, production type and animal populations. Models were selected according to heterogeneity between studies. The effectiveness of interventions was assessed using pooled odds ratio of resistance to antimicrobial substances/classes by bacteria for associations between animal populations with and without intervention.A total of 46 studies were eligible for review. For chicken broilers, most interventions were identified as antimicrobial restrictions on all non-therapeutic use (46%), complete restriction (27%), and prohibition on antimicrobials used for growth promotion (23%). As for pig populations, restrictions were mainly observed on all non-therapeutic use (37%), complete restriction (37%) and group treatments (22%). For meta-analysis, 21 studies were pooled after assessment of existing combinations. These combinations demonstrated a protective effect for most antimicrobial classes in Escherichia coli, Campylobacter and Enterococcus isolates from samples of chicken broilers as well in Escherichia coli and Campylobacter spp. from samples of pigs, compared to animals raised under conventional production or without intervention. Increased odds of resistance were only observed for cephalosporins in E. coli and broilers raised without antimicrobials, and to fluoroquinolones and quinolones in Campylobacter and pigs raised without antimicrobials, compared to conventional production.Our study indicates that organic production, antimicrobial-free farms, and group treatment restrictions are recommended for AMR reduction, providing information that may support decision-making to tackle AMR and better reporting to improve comparability of results between studies." @default.
• W4385988172 created "2023-08-19" @default.
• W4385988172 creator A5016352386 @default.
• W4385988172 creator A5038501019 @default.
• W4385988172 creator A5056768631 @default.
• W4385988172 creator A5058073397 @default.
• W4385988172 creator A5064735953 @default.
• W4385988172 creator A5078621975 @default.
• W4385988172 creator A5092663112 @default.
• W4385988172 date "2023-09-01" @default.
• W4385988172 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4385988172 title "Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions directed at tackling antimicrobial resistance in animal production: A systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W4385988172 cites W1709885097 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W1968346403 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W1976491634 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2020452305 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2024395529 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2038532277 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2058399769 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2061606889 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2071622758 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2081489735 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2103655177 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2106745230 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2109204419 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2109887283 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2123074327 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2136662523 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2139168999 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2144043791 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2154639178 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2154975875 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2155183403 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2166601188 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2177467983 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2460655162 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2560438049 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2618916911 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2619325895 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2625369252 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2767596635 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2896055215 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2902084297 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2908805569 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2937759506 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2947506286 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2967505407 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2971123346 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W2981927955 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W3010433849 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W3089519532 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W3091799371 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W3093129818 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W3136231668 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W3138279047 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W3151093886 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W3160060143 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W3160880262 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W3172429804 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W3197833453 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W4220666762 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W4220809350 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W4221066093 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W4232058719 @default.
• W4385988172 cites W4366584743 @default.
• W4385988172 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.106002" @default.
• W4385988172 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37639825" @default.
• W4385988172 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4385988172 type Work @default.
• W4385988172 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4385988172 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4385988172 hasAuthorship W4385988172A5016352386 @default.
• W4385988172 hasAuthorship W4385988172A5038501019 @default.
• W4385988172 hasAuthorship W4385988172A5056768631 @default.
• W4385988172 hasAuthorship W4385988172A5058073397 @default.
• W4385988172 hasAuthorship W4385988172A5064735953 @default.
• W4385988172 hasAuthorship W4385988172A5078621975 @default.
• W4385988172 hasAuthorship W4385988172A5092663112 @default.
• W4385988172 hasBestOaLocation W43859881721 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C150903083 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C42972112 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C4937899 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C94665300 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConceptScore W4385988172C118552586 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConceptScore W4385988172C126322002 @default.
• W4385988172 hasConceptScore W4385988172C150903083 @default.

• next