FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386147932> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4386147932 endingPage "e44985" @default.
• W4386147932 startingPage "e44985" @default.
• W4386147932 abstract "The treatment for cancer can have a negative impact not only on physical well-being but also on mental health and the quality of life (QoL). Health apps enable the monitoring of different parameters, but to date, there are only few that support patients with cancer and none that focuses on the assessment of QoL. Furthermore, patients as stakeholders are often only integrated at the late stage of the development process, if at all.The aim of this research was to develop and evaluate a smartphone app (Lion-App) to enable patients with cancer to autonomously measure the QoL with an iterative, user-centered approach.Patients with cancer were involved in a 3-stage process from conceptualization to the point when the app was available on the tester's private device. First, focus groups with members (N=21) of cancer support groups were conducted to understand their expectations and needs. Thereafter, individual tests were performed. After developing a prototype that incorporated findings from the focus groups, a second test cycle was conducted, followed by a beta test lasting 2 months. In our app, the QoL can be assessed via a patient diary and an integrated questionnaire. Through all stages, usability was evaluated using the modular extended version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ+), including the calculation of a key performance indicator (KPI). If possible, the impact of sex on the results was evaluated. As part of the beta test, usage rates as well as age-dependent differences were also assessed.A total of 21 participants took part in the initial 3 focus groups. In the subsequent usability testing (N=18), 17 (94%) participants rated their impression through the UEQ+, with a mean KPI of 2.12 (SD 0.64, range: -3 to 3). In the second usability test (N=14), the mean KPI increased to 2.28 (SD=0.49). In the beta test, the usage rate of 19 participants was evaluated, of whom 14 (74%) also answered the UEQ+ (mean KPI 1.78, SD 0.84). An influence of age on the number of questionnaire responses in Lion-App was observed, with a decrease in responses with increasing age (P=.02). Sex-dependent analyses were only possible for the first usability test and the beta test. The main adjustments based on user feedback were a restructuring of the diary as well as integration of a shorter questionnaire to assess the QoL.The iterative, user-centered approach for development and usability testing resulted in positive evaluations of Lion-App. Our app was rated as suitable for everyday use to monitor the QoL of patients with cancer. Initial results indicated that the sex and age of participants seem to play only a minor role." @default.
• W4386147932 created "2023-08-25" @default.
• W4386147932 creator A5003121149 @default.
• W4386147932 creator A5003831561 @default.
• W4386147932 creator A5010820385 @default.
• W4386147932 creator A5017172335 @default.
• W4386147932 creator A5047981431 @default.
• W4386147932 date "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4386147932 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4386147932 title "User-centered development of a mobile application to assess Quality of Life of cancer patients: Results of an iterative investigation and usability testing (Preprint)" @default.
• W4386147932 cites W1967596572 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W1982946927 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2019329210 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2037682485 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2099473180 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2153037374 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2159306398 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2195040438 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2534459715 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2566152916 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2756029264 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2771944080 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2803984570 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2913898034 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2921572588 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2934166592 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2940596780 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2953688978 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2954563606 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2955913074 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2963394404 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W2996277841 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3000076819 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3005435850 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3022849730 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3026091772 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3033882961 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3094110304 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3097015805 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3097070196 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3119780238 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3128646645 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3147142721 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3164244650 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3200202852 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W3202477129 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W4206441301 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W4210354857 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W4211072278 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W4225424162 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W4247861653 @default.
• W4386147932 cites W4286355005 @default.
• W4386147932 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/44985" @default.
• W4386147932 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37751285" @default.
• W4386147932 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4386147932 type Work @default.
• W4386147932 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4386147932 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4386147932 hasAuthorship W4386147932A5003121149 @default.
• W4386147932 hasAuthorship W4386147932A5003831561 @default.
• W4386147932 hasAuthorship W4386147932A5010820385 @default.
• W4386147932 hasAuthorship W4386147932A5017172335 @default.
• W4386147932 hasAuthorship W4386147932A5047981431 @default.
• W4386147932 hasBestOaLocation W43861479321 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C101468663 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C115903868 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C143587482 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C201025465 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConcept C90734943 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConceptScore W4386147932C101468663 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConceptScore W4386147932C107457646 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConceptScore W4386147932C111472728 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConceptScore W4386147932C111919701 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConceptScore W4386147932C115903868 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConceptScore W4386147932C127413603 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConceptScore W4386147932C138885662 @default.
• W4386147932 hasConceptScore W4386147932C143587482 @default.

• next